Coinbase report: Crypto users want to pay taxes, but complexity remains

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-30Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-30

Анотація

A Coinbase and CoinTracker report reveals that while the majority of cryptocurrency users intend to comply with tax rules, widespread confusion and complexity hinder compliance. Key findings show 74% of users know crypto is taxable and 65% have reported it previously, but only 49% correctly identify taxable events. New IRS Form 1099-DA, set for 2027, aims to standardize reporting but does not resolve the critical challenge of cost basis calculation. With users averaging 2.5 platforms and 83% using self-custody wallets, tracking original purchase prices remains difficult. Only 35% have adjusted cost basis. As a result, many users are turning to AI, with 47% open to using it for calculations and 30% for the entire tax process, though traditional methods like tax software (78%) and accountants (52%) remain dominant.

Most crypto users intend to comply with tax requirements. Still, confusion around reporting rules and transaction tracking continues to create friction, according to a new industry report.

A joint study by Coinbase and CoinTracker found that 74% of users are aware that crypto is taxable, and 65% have reported crypto activity in the past.

However, understanding remains uneven: only 49% correctly identify when a taxable event occurs, and nearly two-thirds are unaware of upcoming rule changes.

The findings suggest that compliance is not the primary issue. Instead, users face challenges navigating an increasingly complex reporting environment.

IRS 1099-DA rules expand reporting requirements

The growing complexity comes as the U.S. government moves to standardize crypto tax reporting through Form 1099-DA.

Under new guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department, digital asset brokers will be required to provide transaction statements detailing proceeds from crypto activity, with updated rules allowing these forms to be delivered electronically starting in 2027.

The changes are intended to streamline reporting and reduce administrative burdens, reflecting the largely digital nature of crypto transactions. However, they also formalize expectations around tax reporting as regulators expand oversight of the sector.

Cost basis complexity remains unresolved

Despite these updates, a key challenge remains unresolved: cost basis calculation.

Crypto users often transact across multiple exchanges, wallets, and platforms, with the report showing an average of 2.5 platforms per user and 83% utilizing self-custody wallets.

This fragmented activity makes it difficult to track the original purchase price of assets, which is necessary to calculate gains or losses.

While Form 1099-DA will report gross proceeds, users are still responsible for determining their adjusted cost basis and reconciling transactions across platforms.

Only 35% of respondents said they had adjusted cost basis in the past, highlighting a significant gap between regulatory requirements and user capability.

The report identifies this mismatch as a central issue, in which rising compliance expectations are not yet matched by accessible tools or user understanding.

AI emerges as a potential solution

As complexity grows, users are turning to automation for support.

Nearly half of respondents [47%] said they would use AI tools to calculate taxable income and capital gains. In comparison, 30% indicated they would rely on AI to handle the entire tax process.

Despite this shift, traditional methods still dominate, with 78% using general tax software and 52% relying on accountants.


Final Summary

  • Most crypto users intend to comply with tax rules, but confusion around reporting and cost basis tracking remains widespread.
  • New IRS reporting requirements increase transparency, but do not fully address the complexity users face.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of crypto users are aware that crypto is taxable, according to the Coinbase and CoinTracker report?

A74% of users are aware that crypto is taxable.

QWhat is the name of the new IRS form that will standardize crypto tax reporting?

AThe new form is called Form 1099-DA.

QWhat is the primary unresolved challenge for crypto users when calculating their taxes, as identified in the report?

AThe primary unresolved challenge is cost basis calculation, due to users transacting across multiple platforms and self-custody wallets.

QWhat percentage of respondents said they would use AI tools to calculate taxable income and capital gains?

A47% of respondents said they would use AI tools for this purpose.

QWhen will the updated rules for Form 1099-DA, allowing for electronic delivery, come into effect?

AThe updated rules allowing these forms to be delivered electronically will start in 2027.

Пов'язані матеріали

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit2 хв тому

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit2 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 год тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2 год тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片