Coinbase Flags Concerns Over CLARITY Bill

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-12

Анотація

Coinbase has threatened to withdraw its support for the upcoming CLARITY Act, a key U.S. crypto bill, if it restricts the ability of platforms to offer rewards on stablecoin holdings beyond basic disclosure rules. The exchange argues such limitations would harm its business and competition in the stablecoin market, particularly affecting rewards programs for assets like USD Coin. This stance follows the earlier GENIUS Act, which prohibited issuers from paying yields but allowed third-party platforms to offer rewards. Coinbase claims restricting platform-based rewards would undermine previous compromises and unfairly advantage traditional banks. The issue arises as policymakers work on broader crypto market reforms, with some senators seeking a compromise that would permit rewards only for chartered banks or trust companies.

As per the reports, it is speculated that Coinbase might withdraw its support for Washington’s upcoming major crypto bill. The firm is setting its boundaries as Congress moves closer to finalising its upcoming major crypto bill named the CLARITY Act.

In a report shared by Bloomberg on January 11, a warning surfaced as policymakers got ready to put up an extensive digital-asset market structure bill in the Senate later this week. Coinbase revealed that it may pull out its support for the CLARITY Act if it limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules.

As per the exchange, the issue directly hits its business and the competition in the stablecoin market, and the people close to the company’s thinking think alike. The ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, mainly USD Coin, remains at stake.

Association with the other Act

The debate trails through the GENIUS Act in July, which made the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. That law bars creators from paying interest or yield associated only with holding stablecoins, but it does not obstruct third-party platforms from offering rewards to users.

Companies associated with crypto say that distinction was intentional. The officials from Coinbase state that prohibiting platform-based rewards would revoke compromises so far settled in the GENIUS Act and shift the field in favour of banks.

The firm has also mounted rewards as a way to make the role of the dollar in global digital finance more robust, mainly as different countries explore interest-bearing virtual currencies. Political pressure surrounding the bill is also increasing. In the election cycle of 2023-24, the crypto industry was leading in being the largest corporate political spender, in which Coinbase was a prominent donor.

The threat to withdraw support has weight as policymakers attempt to maintain momentum in the back of broader market structure reforms. Still, the final outcome is not clear. Some senators are looking for a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies holding bank or trust charters.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Holds Near $92K as Asia Rises Ahead of US CPI Data

TagsCoinbaseCrypto BillGenius ACT

Пов'язані питання

QWhy might Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase may withdraw its support if the CLARITY Act limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules, as this directly impacts its business and competition in the stablecoin market.

QWhat is the main concern for Coinbase regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main concern is the potential restriction on the ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, particularly for USD Coin, which is a key part of its business model.

QHow does the GENIUS Act relate to the current debate over the CLARITY Act?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in July, established the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. It prohibits issuers from paying interest directly but allows third-party platforms to offer rewards. The current debate centers on whether the CLARITY Act will uphold this distinction.

QWhat is the crypto industry's argument for allowing platform-based stablecoin rewards?

AThe industry argues that prohibiting platform-based rewards would undo compromises made in the GENIUS Act and unfairly shift the competitive landscape in favor of traditional banks.

QWhat is one potential legislative compromise being considered regarding stablecoin rewards?

ASome senators are seeking a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies that hold a bank or trust charter, attempting to balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Пов'язані матеріали

Low Probability, High Impact: Citi Issues Nine Extreme Risk Warnings for Commodities in H2 2026

Citigroup Global Research has released a commodity tail risk report focusing on low-probability, high-impact scenarios for late 2026. The report argues that traditional supply-demand frameworks are now regularly disrupted by geopolitical, climate, and technological shocks. Nine key "wildcard" risks are identified: 1. **U.S.-Iran conflict** escalating to a persistent, multi-year disruption of Gulf oil production, potentially pushing crude above $150/bbl and retail gasoline above $6/gallon. 2. **Russia-Ukraine war escalation** triggering new restrictions on Russian energy exports, particularly impacting global natural gas and refined products markets more than crude oil. 3. **Aggressive stockpiling of critical minerals**, such as copper, potentially driving prices above $20,000/ton. 4. **Gold prices** potentially falling another 15-20% in the near term before potentially doubling to around $6,000/oz in the longer term. 5. **A record-strength El Niño** severely disrupting agricultural supplies, possibly pushing cocoa back above $10,000/ton. 6. **AI boom or bust** creating a two-way risk: a boom would boost demand for power-related commodities (electricity, gas, uranium, copper, aluminum), while a bust could cause a deflationary demand shock, though gold could benefit in either scenario. 7. **Renewed U.S.-China trade war** impacting American farm exports, potentially pushing corn below $4.20/bushel and soybeans below $10/bushel. 8. **Finalization of the Russia-China "Power of Siberia 2" gas pipeline** deal, which would drastically reduce China's LNG import needs post-2030, exacerbating a looming global LNG glut and pressuring prices towards $5-6/MMBtu. 9. **An extreme "Monroe Doctrine" scenario** where the U.S. blocks all oil exports from the Americas, causing a severe benchmark dislocation (high global prices like Brent above $100/bbl, but a steep discount for trapped American crude). The report advises investors to stress-test portfolios against these poorly priced extreme scenarios, as "once-in-a-decade" shocks have become more frequent.

marsbit4 хв тому

Low Probability, High Impact: Citi Issues Nine Extreme Risk Warnings for Commodities in H2 2026

marsbit4 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片