Coinbase Expands Prediction Markets to All 50 U.S. States

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

Coinbase has expanded its prediction markets feature to all 50 U.S. states, allowing nationwide event-based trading within its app. Developed in partnership with U.S.-based platform Kalshi, the feature enables users to trade yes-or-no contracts on events like sports, politics, entertainment, and economic developments such as Federal Reserve decisions. Pricing is based on supply and demand, reflecting market sentiment. Trades can be executed with USD or USD Coin, with low minimum amounts. While Kalshi currently provides contracts and liquidity, Coinbase plans to support additional providers in the future. The move is part of Coinbase's strategy to become a comprehensive financial platform within U.S. regulatory boundaries, despite some legal challenges Kalshi has faced regarding sports-related contracts in certain states.

Coinbase has spread its wings of the prediction markets feature to users in all 50 U.S. states, offering customers nationwide access to event-based trading inside its application. The firm has officially accepted the launch on January 28, accompanying the initial launch in December that was restricted to select users.

The feature, developed with a partnership of Kalshi, a U.S.-backed prediction market platform, permits users to trade normal yes-or-no contracts associated with real events. With the amalgamation, the users of Coinbase can trade on a variety of events.

The events majorly include sports, politics, entertainment and prominent economic developments like Federal Reserve decisions. Price shift is done on the basis of supply and demand, catching how the market broadly assesses the possibility of every result.

Having a low minimum amount, trades can be done using USD or USD Coin. At rollout, Kalshi offered all contracts and liquidity. Coinbase revealed that it has planned to back additional providers in the long run.

The Legal Pushback

The markets sit with the company of current crypto and cash features, having everything within a single interface. The launch is followed by the increased tradition of prediction markets in the U.S., ignited by the increased demand for crowd-based anticipations associated with prominent events.

As they offer a flexible alternative for offshore or decentralised markets that are not liable to U.S. regulatory oversight, regulated platforms such as Kalshi have successfully captivated attention.

Coinbase formulated the expansion as part of its wider push to be an all-in-one financial platform. By amalgamating prediction markets with crypto trading, the company is seeking to broaden its product lineup while being within the regulatory boundaries of the United States.

However, Kalshi also underwent legal pushback in various states regarding sports-associated contracts; it has carried on to safeguard collaborations with prominent trading platforms.

The launch of Coinbase indicates surged confidence in regulated prediction markets, mentioning their gentle integration into main financial platforms.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Optimism Approves OP Token Buybacks Using Superchain Revenue

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the new feature that Coinbase has expanded to all 50 U.S. states?

ACoinbase has expanded its prediction markets feature to all 50 U.S. states.

QWhich company did Coinbase partner with to develop its prediction markets feature?

ACoinbase partnered with Kalshi, a U.S.-backed prediction market platform, to develop the feature.

QWhat types of events can users trade on in the new Coinbase prediction markets?

AUsers can trade on events including sports, politics, entertainment, and prominent economic developments like Federal Reserve decisions.

QWhat currencies can be used to place trades in Coinbase's prediction markets?

ATrades can be done using USD or USD Coin (USDC).

QWhat was one of the legal challenges mentioned that Kalshi faced?

AKalshi underwent legal pushback in various states regarding sports-associated contracts.

Пов'язані матеріали

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手3 год тому

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手3 год тому

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 год тому

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 год тому

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinist3 год тому

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinist3 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси