Coinbase Executive Backs CLARITY Act Delay Amid Crypto Frustration

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-03

Анотація

Coinbase executive John D'Agostino supports the CLARITY Act's delay, emphasizing that the comprehensive market structure legislation requires careful consideration due to its foundational role in regulating digital assets. Unlike the simpler GENIUS Act passed earlier, the CLARITY Act involves defining jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight across multiple regulators, which takes time but is crucial for long-term industry growth. Despite causing frustration and contributing to capital outflows, the delay is seen as necessary to avoid future regulatory confusion. The White House has signaled potential progress in January, aiming to curb talent migration and provide clarity. While the act may not immediately impact markets like Bitcoin's price, its proper implementation is prioritized over haste, with potential to reshape U.S. digital asset operations for decades.


The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, widely known as the CLARITY Act, continues to test the patience of the US crypto industry. However, a senior executive at Coinbase says the delay is both expected and necessary, given the scope of what the legislation aims to achieve.

Speaking on CNBC on Friday, Coinbase’s institutional head of strategy John D’Agostino said he fully understands why the bill has not yet crossed the finish line.

“I completely understand why this is taking longer,” D’Agostino said. “It’s the kind of bill that is more foundational for the growth of crypto or any real asset class.” He added that lawmakers need time because the CLARITY Act addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate in the United States.

CLARITY Act faces deeper complexity than GENIUS Act

D’Agostino contrasted the CLARITY Act with the recently passed GENIUS Act, which became law in July. While he described the GENIUS Act as transformative, he said it focused on issues that were structurally simpler.

According to him, market structure legislation requires lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators. These factors naturally slow progress but also increase the long-term value of the outcome.

As a result, Coinbase believes patience now could prevent regulatory confusion later, especially as crypto markets grow and intersect more deeply with traditional finance.

White House signals progress in January

Optimism around the bill has not disappeared. Just weeks ago, White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks said lawmakers were close to advancing the CLARITY Act early next year.

“We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation,” Sacks said on Dec. 19, adding that the administration plans to “finish the job in January.”

Supporters argue that the bill could reduce uncertainty that has driven talent and capital overseas. D’Agostino echoed these sentiments and pointed out that the “massive talent migration” away from the US crypto sector is contributing to the pressure to legislative action.

Market impact and industry reaction

Nevertheless, despite these assurances, delays had impacted market sentiment. Asset manager CoinShares recently linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to prolonged regulatory uncertainty tied to the CLARITY Act.

However, not everyone expects the legislation to move markets immediately. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the bill, while important, may not significantly affect Bitcoin’s price in the short term.

“Is it world-shaking? No,” Brandt added. “It’s necessary but not value-definiting.”

Looking ahead

Coinbase, as well as most of the crypto industry, is focused on getting the right framework rather than hastened regulation. Even as frustration mounts, it seems CEOs place greater emphasis on having the right framework in place.

If Congress delivers clarity in 2026, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades, even if the wait proves difficult in the near term.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Can Dogecoin Sustain Its Recovery Above $0.135?

TagsBlockchainCoinbaseCryptocrypto regulationStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhy does Coinbase executive John D'Agostino believe the delay of the CLARITY Act is necessary?

AHe believes the delay is necessary because the CLARITY Act is a foundational bill that addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate, requiring lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators, which naturally takes more time.

QHow does the CLARITY Act differ from the recently passed GENIUS Act according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act addresses more complex structural issues like market jurisdiction and regulatory oversight, while the GENIUS Act, though transformative, focused on structurally simpler issues.

QWhat did White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks say about the progress of the CLARITY Act?

ADavid Sacks stated that lawmakers were closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation and that the administration plans to 'finish the job in January'.

QWhat market reaction has been linked to the delays in the CLARITY Act's passage?

AAsset manager CoinShares linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to the prolonged regulatory uncertainty caused by the delay of the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the long-term potential impact of the CLARITY Act if passed, according to the article?

AIf passed, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades by providing a clear regulatory framework, reducing uncertainty, and preventing future regulatory confusion.

Пов'язані матеріали

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手15 хв тому

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手15 хв тому

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight News2 год тому

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight News2 год тому

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit4 год тому

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit4 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片