CME Group Announces Round-The-Clock Crypto Derivatives Trading Beginning May 29

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-20

Анотація

CME Group, the world's largest derivatives marketplace, will introduce nearly 24/7 trading for its cryptocurrency futures and options starting May 29, pending regulatory approval. The new schedule on the CME Globex platform will include a brief weekend maintenance break. This move responds to record-high client demand for crypto risk management tools, with the exchange reporting $3 trillion in notional trading volume in 2025 alone. Year-to-date average daily volume surged 46% to 407,200 contracts. The extended hours will allow traders to manage exposure continuously amid market volatility, aligning regulated derivatives more closely with the crypto market's always-on nature.

CME Group, the world’s largest derivatives marketplace, announced Thursday that it will introduce nearly round‐the‐clock trading for its cryptocurrency derivatives, with the new schedule set to begin on May 29, pending regulatory approval.

The exchange announced that its crypto futures and options will transition to continuous trading on the CME Globex platform, providing broader access beyond the traditional weekly schedule. While the platform will operate on an almost 24/7 basis, it will still include a minimum two‐hour maintenance break each weekend.

‘All‐Time High’ Demand For Crypto Risk Tools

Under the updated framework, trades executed between Friday evening and Sunday evening will be assigned a trade date of the next business day. CME added that clearing, settlement, and regulatory reporting for those transactions will also be processed on the following business day.

According to the firm’s press release, the decision reflects the surging demand for cryptocurrency risk management tools amid falling cryptocurrency prices, including a 50% drop in Bitcoin’s value in just four months.

The daily chart shows BTC’s price trending downwards following October’s high record. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com

Notably, Tim McCourt, CME Group’s Global Head of Equities, FX, and Alternative Products, said client appetite for digital asset exposure has reached unprecedented levels.

In 2025 alone, the exchange recorded $3 trillion in notional trading volume across its cryptocurrency futures and options suite, a record for the platform.

“Client demand for risk management in the digital asset market is at an all-time high,” McCourt said, noting that continuous access to regulated crypto derivatives will allow traders to manage exposure whenever market conditions shift.

While he acknowledged that not every asset class is suited for nonstop trading, he emphasized that always‐on access to transparent and regulated cryptocurrency products will enable clients to trade with greater flexibility and confidence.

Futures Lead 47% Jump In CME Group Digital Asset Activity

CME Group’s crypto complex has continued to expand in 2026. The exchange reported average daily volume of 407,200 contracts so far this year, marking a 46% increase compared with the same period in 2025. Average daily open interest reached 335,400 contracts, up 7% year over year (YoY).

Futures activity on the platform has been particularly strong, with the average daily volume climbing 47% from a year earlier.

Although CME Group has confirmed May 29 as its target launch date, the exchange noted that the extended trading schedule remains subject to regulatory review and final approval.

If cleared, the move would mark a significant step in aligning regulated crypto derivatives trading more closely with the around‐the‐clock nature of underlying digital asset markets.

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the new trading schedule for CME Group's cryptocurrency derivatives and when does it begin?

ACME Group will introduce nearly round-the-clock trading for its cryptocurrency derivatives, set to begin on May 29, pending regulatory approval. The schedule includes a minimum two-hour maintenance break each weekend.

QAccording to CME Group, what is there an 'all-time high' demand for?

AAccording to Tim McCourt, CME Group's Global Head of Equities, FX, and Alternative Products, there is an 'all-time high' client demand for risk management tools in the digital asset market.

QHow much notional trading volume did CME Group record for its cryptocurrency futures and options in 2025?

ACME Group recorded $3 trillion in notional trading volume across its cryptocurrency futures and options suite in 2025, which was a record for the platform.

QWhat is the year-over-year (YoY) percentage increase in average daily volume for CME Group's crypto complex so far in 2026?

AThe average daily volume for CME Group's crypto complex so far in 2026 is 407,200 contracts, marking a 46% increase compared to the same period in 2025.

QIs the launch of the extended trading schedule final, or is it contingent on another factor?

AThe launch of the extended trading schedule is not final; it remains subject to regulatory review and final approval.

Пов'язані матеріали

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitЩойно

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitЩойно

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit41 хв тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit41 хв тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2 год тому

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片