CLARITY Act edges closer – But ONE disagreement is holding everything up

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-18

Анотація

The CLARITY Act, a key piece of U.S. crypto market structure legislation, is advancing but remains stalled due to a major disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins. While the crypto industry supports such products, traditional banks oppose them, fearing capital flight from deposits. Despite this impasse, political pressure is mounting, notably from President Donald Trump, who publicly demanded the bill's swift passage to maintain U.S. financial leadership and prevent innovation from moving abroad. The crypto community expresses growing confidence in the bill's eventual success, with Polymarket bettors assigning a 62% probability of it passing in 2026. The legislation aims to provide regulatory clarity and unlock institutional investment, but disagreements continue to delay progress.

The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins. However, clear rules for the rest of the crypto market are still missing.

That may soon change, as the recent data from Santiment suggested the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act is moving closer to the final stage of the legislative process.

If passed, the bill could mark a turning point for institutional investment in crypto, providing clearer regulatory guidance for large investors.

Source: Santiment/X

CLARITY Act talks continue

Talking about the same at the DC Blockchain Summit on the 17th of March, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott said the bill is still delayed due to a disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins.

While the crypto industry supports such products, banks fear they could pull large amounts of money away from traditional deposits.

That said, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks are currently reviewing these concerns and pushing for stronger safeguards if crypto products function like bank services.

This cautious approach has slowed the bill’s progress. Meanwhile, political pressure is growing, especially after U.S. President Donald Trump urged lawmakers to pass the Act quickly.

President Trump demands CLARITY Act passage

On the 4th of March, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social,

The Genius Act is being threatened and undermined by the Banks, and that is unacceptable — We are not going to allow it. The U.S. needs to get Market Structure done, ASAP.

Donald Trump’s statement has shifted the debate around the CLARITY Act from a technical policy issue to a broader economic and strategic concern.

He argues that without clear crypto regulations, capital and innovation could move to countries like China, making the bill important for maintaining U.S. financial leadership.

Trump also criticized major banks for resisting crypto reforms, despite reporting record profits, suggesting they are prioritizing their own interests.

By linking the CLARITY Act to his goal of making the U.S. the global crypto capital, he has increased pressure on lawmakers to move the legislation forward.

Crypto community stands confident

The confidence was also reflected in the crypto community, as noted by Senator Kevin Cramer when he said,

I think we have to make this a committee priority for some time just before Easter or shortly after.

Echoing similar sentiments, Dan Spuller, EVP of Industry Affairs at Blockchain Association, added,

I’m now increasingly confident we’re going to get CLARITY through, and we’re not going to let the banks rig the outcome.

Polymarket odds and other hiccups

Additionally, Polymarket bettors have also pushed the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 to a commanding 62%.

Source: Polymarket

Needless to say, the bill has now become the center of a growing clash between the U.S. government and traditional banks.

This disagreement has stalled the bill since early 2026. Thus, as expected, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, had put it best when he said,

The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.


Final Summary

  • Clear rules could unlock large institutional capital that has remained cautious due to regulatory uncertainty.
  • However, a key disagreement over interest-bearing stablecoins continues to slow progress.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main disagreement holding up the CLARITY Act according to the article?

AThe main disagreement is over interest-bearing stablecoins, with the crypto industry supporting such products while banks fear they could pull large amounts of money away from traditional deposits.

QWhat did U.S. President Donald Trump say about the CLARITY Act and the banks?

APresident Trump stated that the 'Genius Act' (referring to the CLARITY Act) is being 'threatened and undermined by the Banks' and that this is unacceptable. He argued that the U.S. needs to get Market Structure done ASAP and criticized major banks for resisting crypto reforms despite reporting record profits.

QAccording to the article, what is the predicted probability of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 on Polymarket?

APolymarket bettors have pushed the odds of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 to 62%.

QHow did Trump's advisor, Patrick Witt, characterize attempts to change the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt characterized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill as 'shameful,' stating that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhat previous legislation created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins, as mentioned in the article?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, created a regulatory framework for U.S. stablecoins.

Пов'язані матеріали

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit57 хв тому

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit57 хв тому

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit59 хв тому

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit59 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити ONE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Harmony (ONE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Harmony (ONE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Harmony (ONE)Після придбання Harmony (ONE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Harmony (ONE)Легко торгуйте Harmony (ONE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

312 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2025.03.21

Як купити ONE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ONE (ONE).

活动图片