CLARITY Act Could Unlock Wider Tech Growth In America, Says a16z

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-05-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-17

Анотація

The CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill, faces its main hurdle in securing bipartisan Senate support, according to Grayscale. While it advanced from committee with mostly Republican votes, achieving the needed 60 votes will require significant Democratic support. Analysts cite the bipartisan passage of the GENIUS Act as a hopeful precedent. Venture firm a16z argues the bill's impact extends beyond crypto, claiming a clear U.S. legal framework would drive wider domestic innovation and bolster the dollar's global standing. Internationally, the legislation is seen as a regulatory signal for other countries. The outcome now depends on Senate vote counts.

Bipartisan support remains the main obstacle standing between the CLARITY Act and becoming law. That was the assessment from asset management firm Grayscale on Friday, even as the company said it believes the bill has a strong chance of passing.

Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, meaning at least seven Democrats would need to cross the aisle for the legislation to clear the full chamber.

CLARITY Act Advances

The CLARITY Act advanced out of the US Senate Banking Committee last Thursday after a vote that split mostly along party lines. All 13 Republican members voted in favor, joined by two Democrats.

Nine Democrats voted against it. The bill, which aims to give the crypto industry clearer rules around market structure, has been a subject of intense debate since its introduction in July 2025.

Grayscale pointed to the GENIUS Act as a possible guide for what comes next. That stablecoin legislation passed the Senate with 66 votes, including 18 Democrats.

Based on that track record, Grayscale said it believes similar bipartisan backing for the CLARITY Act is achievable, though it acknowledged that several hurdles remain before it can be signed into law.

Broader Economic Stakes

Venture capital firm a16z crypto argued Friday that the implications of the bill go well beyond the crypto sector. According to the firm, giving builders in the US a clear legal framework would drive wider domestic innovation.

BTCUSD now trading at $78,417. Chart: TradingView

It cited the GENIUS Act’s passage as a precedent, saying that legislation produced strong growth and adoption that it described as beneficial not just for the US economy but for the long-term position of the US dollar globally.

The US dollar index, which measures the dollar’s strength against a basket of major currencies, stood at 99.26 at the time of publication, up 1.25% over the prior 30 days, according to TradingView data.

Image: IQ.wiki

Global Signal

Sharplink Gaming CEO Joseph Chalom added another dimension to the conversation, saying the bill is being watched far beyond US borders.

While many see the legislation as a domestic matter, Chalom said other countries are treating it as a signal for how they might approach their own crypto regulations.

A16z framed the broader stakes plainly: when US legal frameworks balance innovation with consumer protection, the country tends to lead and the rest of the world follows.

Whether the Senate delivers that framework is now a question of vote counting.

Featured image from MadebyBaurley, chart from TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main obstacle for the CLARITY Act to become law according to Grayscale?

ABipartisan support remains the main obstacle for the CLARITY Act to become law.

QHow did the US Senate Banking Committee vote on the CLARITY Act, and what was the party-line split?

AThe CLARITY Act advanced out of the US Senate Banking Committee with all 13 Republican members voting in favor, joined by two Democrats, while nine Democrats voted against it.

QWhat precedent does a16z crypto cite to argue for the potential benefits of the CLARITY Act?

Aa16z crypto cites the passage of the GENIUS Act as a precedent, saying it produced strong growth and adoption beneficial for the US economy and the long-term global position of the US dollar.

QAccording to Sharplink Gaming CEO Joseph Chalom, how are other countries viewing the CLARITY Act?

AJoseph Chalom said that other countries are treating the CLARITY Act as a signal for how they might approach their own crypto regulations, watching it far beyond US borders.

QWhat does a16z crypto argue is the broader implication of passing the CLARITY Act for US innovation?

Aa16z crypto argues that giving builders in the US a clear legal framework through the CLARITY Act would drive wider domestic innovation.

Пов'язані матеріали

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit3 хв тому

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit3 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit23 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit23 хв тому

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbit23 хв тому

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbit23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片