Chainlink eyes DeFi dominance? Assessing $70B TVS, ETF inflows & more…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

Despite the 2025 market cycle's hype, institutional investors appear hesitant towards "fundamentals-led" narratives, as seen with Ethereum's price decline despite strong on-chain activity. A clear divergence emerged in ETF flows, with Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) attracting $4.05 million in inflows while Ethereum's saw significant outflows. Chainlink's ETF inflows even outpaced Dogecoin's, despite its smaller market cap, suggesting institutional interest may be driven by fundamentals rather than short-term speculation. This is supported by Chainlink's growing role in DeFi, including its integration into Korea's stablecoin expansion via the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS) and a record $70 billion in Total Value Secured (TVS). These factors position Chainlink as a key infrastructure player, attracting institutional capital based on adoption, trust, and real-world utility.

Despite all the hype in the 2025 cycle, it doesn’t look like institutions are fully buying the “fundamentals-led” story.

Take Ethereum, for example: Down 11% in 2025, and still it saw strong on-chain activity.

For context, the Fuska and Pecta upgrades cut fees and eased congestion, with daily transactions even hitting a record 2.3 million, showing that the upgrades have started delivering results in the 2026 cycle so far.

Still, big money isn’t really showing up.

On-chain strength, institutional hesitation

ETF flows saw nearly $664 million in outflows this week alone. In contrast, Chainlink’s [LINK] Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, marking a clear divergence.

To put that in perspective, Ethereum’s [ETH] Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows over the same period. For Layer-1s, that kind of divergence in institutional flows doesn’t look like a short-term rotation.

Building on that, SoSoValue data showed an even clearer contrast.

Chainlink’s ETF flows continue to outpace Dogecoin’s [DOGE], whose net inflows still trail LINK, even though DOGE’s market cap is nearly 3× larger.

Technically, this suggests ETF capital rotating into Chainlink isn’t chasing short-term moves. Instead, it raises the question: Is LINK one of the few high-cap assets still seeing a fundamentals-driven institutional rally?

Chainlink pushes to hold DeFi dominance as rivalry intensifies

The 2025 cycle set the stage for bringing DeFi back to the mainstream.

Data from DeFiLlama as of press time showed total value locked (TVL) across all Layer-1s climbing to $170 billion, reclaiming the level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market, pointing to a return of on-chain liquidity.

Naturally, that growth spilled into key sectors like stablecoins, RWA, and AI.

Enter Chainlink, now part of the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS), putting it right at the center of Korea’s stablecoin expansion.

Put simply, Chainlink isn’t sitting out the DeFi race.

By integrating into global stablecoins (the backbone of DeFi rails), it clearly strengthens LINK’s core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, positioning the network as a key infrastructure player.

Meanwhile, the network’s total value secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion in Q4 2025, reflecting the total assets powered by Chainlink’s oracles and marking a clear sign of its adoption, trust, and real-world usage.

Given this, it’s no surprise that institutional interest is picking up. In this context, Chainlink’s ETF flows appear less speculative and more fundamentally driven, making LINK a clear standout among its rivals.


Final Thoughts

  • While Ethereum’s and Dogecoin’s spot ETFs saw major outflows, Chainlink continues to attract inflows, signaling institutional capital is favoring LINK over other high-cap assets.
  • With TVS hitting $70 billion, global stablecoin integration, and key infrastructure strengths, Chainlink is cementing its role as a core DeFi player.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main divergence observed between Chainlink's and Ethereum's ETF flows in the article?

AWhile Ethereum's Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows, Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, indicating a clear preference for LINK.

QWhat key metric did Chainlink achieve in Q4 2025 that demonstrates its adoption and trust?

AChainlink's Total Value Secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion, reflecting the total assets powered by its oracles.

QHow does the article explain the significance of Chainlink joining the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS)?

AIt puts Chainlink at the center of Korea's stablecoin expansion, strengthening its core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, and positioning it as key DeFi infrastructure.

QAccording to the article, why do Chainlink's ETF inflows appear to be fundamentally driven rather than speculative?

AThe inflows are occurring alongside major fundamental developments like record TVS and global stablecoin integration, rather than just chasing short-term price moves.

QWhat overall trend in the DeFi market does the article highlight with the $170 billion Total Value Locked (TVL) figure?

AIt shows that on-chain liquidity is returning, with TVL reclaiming a $170 billion level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit27 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit27 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit46 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit46 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit55 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit55 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片