Chainlink eyes DeFi dominance? Assessing $70B TVS, ETF inflows & more…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-29

Анотація

Despite the 2025 market cycle's hype, institutional investors appear hesitant towards "fundamentals-led" narratives, as seen with Ethereum's price decline despite strong on-chain activity. A clear divergence emerged in ETF flows, with Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) attracting $4.05 million in inflows while Ethereum's saw significant outflows. Chainlink's ETF inflows even outpaced Dogecoin's, despite its smaller market cap, suggesting institutional interest may be driven by fundamentals rather than short-term speculation. This is supported by Chainlink's growing role in DeFi, including its integration into Korea's stablecoin expansion via the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS) and a record $70 billion in Total Value Secured (TVS). These factors position Chainlink as a key infrastructure player, attracting institutional capital based on adoption, trust, and real-world utility.

Despite all the hype in the 2025 cycle, it doesn’t look like institutions are fully buying the “fundamentals-led” story.

Take Ethereum, for example: Down 11% in 2025, and still it saw strong on-chain activity.

For context, the Fuska and Pecta upgrades cut fees and eased congestion, with daily transactions even hitting a record 2.3 million, showing that the upgrades have started delivering results in the 2026 cycle so far.

Still, big money isn’t really showing up.

On-chain strength, institutional hesitation

ETF flows saw nearly $664 million in outflows this week alone. In contrast, Chainlink’s [LINK] Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, marking a clear divergence.

To put that in perspective, Ethereum’s [ETH] Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows over the same period. For Layer-1s, that kind of divergence in institutional flows doesn’t look like a short-term rotation.

Building on that, SoSoValue data showed an even clearer contrast.

Chainlink’s ETF flows continue to outpace Dogecoin’s [DOGE], whose net inflows still trail LINK, even though DOGE’s market cap is nearly 3× larger.

Technically, this suggests ETF capital rotating into Chainlink isn’t chasing short-term moves. Instead, it raises the question: Is LINK one of the few high-cap assets still seeing a fundamentals-driven institutional rally?

Chainlink pushes to hold DeFi dominance as rivalry intensifies

The 2025 cycle set the stage for bringing DeFi back to the mainstream.

Data from DeFiLlama as of press time showed total value locked (TVL) across all Layer-1s climbing to $170 billion, reclaiming the level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market, pointing to a return of on-chain liquidity.

Naturally, that growth spilled into key sectors like stablecoins, RWA, and AI.

Enter Chainlink, now part of the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS), putting it right at the center of Korea’s stablecoin expansion.

Put simply, Chainlink isn’t sitting out the DeFi race.

By integrating into global stablecoins (the backbone of DeFi rails), it clearly strengthens LINK’s core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, positioning the network as a key infrastructure player.

Meanwhile, the network’s total value secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion in Q4 2025, reflecting the total assets powered by Chainlink’s oracles and marking a clear sign of its adoption, trust, and real-world usage.

Given this, it’s no surprise that institutional interest is picking up. In this context, Chainlink’s ETF flows appear less speculative and more fundamentally driven, making LINK a clear standout among its rivals.


Final Thoughts

  • While Ethereum’s and Dogecoin’s spot ETFs saw major outflows, Chainlink continues to attract inflows, signaling institutional capital is favoring LINK over other high-cap assets.
  • With TVS hitting $70 billion, global stablecoin integration, and key infrastructure strengths, Chainlink is cementing its role as a core DeFi player.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main divergence observed between Chainlink's and Ethereum's ETF flows in the article?

AWhile Ethereum's Grayscale Spot ETF (ETHE) saw $52 million in outflows, Chainlink's Grayscale ETF (GLNK) pulled in $4.05 million in inflows, indicating a clear preference for LINK.

QWhat key metric did Chainlink achieve in Q4 2025 that demonstrates its adoption and trust?

AChainlink's Total Value Secured (TVS) hit a record $70 billion, reflecting the total assets powered by its oracles.

QHow does the article explain the significance of Chainlink joining the Global Alliance for KRW Stablecoins (GAKS)?

AIt puts Chainlink at the center of Korea's stablecoin expansion, strengthening its core fundamentals in privacy, compliance, and interoperability, and positioning it as key DeFi infrastructure.

QAccording to the article, why do Chainlink's ETF inflows appear to be fundamentally driven rather than speculative?

AThe inflows are occurring alongside major fundamental developments like record TVS and global stablecoin integration, rather than just chasing short-term price moves.

QWhat overall trend in the DeFi market does the article highlight with the $170 billion Total Value Locked (TVL) figure?

AIt shows that on-chain liquidity is returning, with TVL reclaiming a $170 billion level for the first time since it was lost after the 2022 bear market.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报9 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报9 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News26 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News26 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit54 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit54 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片