CFTC together with SEC to study cryptocurrency regulation without CLARITY Act

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-13

Анотація

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced a meeting of its advisory committee on August 20 to discuss crypto asset regulation, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets. The meeting will explore possible regulatory approaches for cryptocurrencies in the absence of Congressional action, likely referring to the failure of the U.S. Senate to advance the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act (CLARITY) before its August recess. The announcement follows a similar notice from the SEC, which stated it would discuss a special regulatory regime for certain crypto asset investment contracts and would work within its authority to regulate crypto while also supporting Congressional efforts. Currently, Michael S. Gelber serves as the only Senate-confirmed CFTC commissioner and the agency's chairman, with no indication from President Donald Trump of plans to nominate additional commissioners, a situation that has drawn concern from lawmakers.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced a meeting of a committee that advises the agency on policy issues, including possible ways to regulate cryptocurrencies in the absence of Congressional action.

In a notice published on Thursday, the CFTC said it will hold a meeting of its Technology Advisory Committee on August 20, dedicated to the regulation of crypto assets and artificial intelligence, as well as prediction markets. Among the possible discussion topics related to cryptocurrencies are "areas where regulatory measures could complement future legislation from Congress." This likely refers to the U.S. Senate's failure to advance the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act (CLARITY) before starting its August recess last week.

The CFTC's announcement came after a similar notice from the SEC about a meeting scheduled for Friday. The agenda indicated that the commission intends to discuss "new rules to create a special offering regime for certain investment contracts related to crypto assets." A commission representative added that it will support Congress's efforts to pass a market structure law, but until its passage, the SEC will advance cryptocurrency regulation "within [its] authority."

Michael Selig remains the only CFTC commissioner confirmed by the Senate and the acting chairman of the agency. At the same time, there are no signs that U.S. President Donald Trump intends to announce additional candidates for leadership positions at the commission. Although other CFTC staff will join the acting chairman on August 20, the absence of a full five-member, bipartisan commission has prompted many lawmakers to call on the president to take action.

Related: After Senate delay, the crypto bill has a narrow window to become law

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhich two U.S. regulatory agencies announced meetings to discuss cryptocurrency regulation?

AThe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

QWhat is the significance of the CFTC's meeting scheduled for August 20th regarding crypto assets?

AThe meeting's significance is to discuss potential regulatory measures for crypto assets that could supplement future congressional legislation, especially in light of Congress's failure to advance the CLARITY Act before its recess.

QWhy is there an urgent need for the CFTC and SEC to discuss crypto regulation now, according to the article?

AThe urgency stems from the failure of the U.S. Senate to advance the CLARITY Act (the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act) before its August recess, leaving a regulatory gap that the agencies aim to address within their existing authority.

QWho is currently the only Senate-confirmed commissioner and acting chairman of the CFTC?

AMichael Selig is the only Senate-confirmed commissioner and the acting chairman of the CFTC.

QWhat broader concern does the article raise about the CFTC's leadership structure?

AThe article raises concern that the CFTC lacks a full, bipartisan slate of five commissioners. This has led many lawmakers to call on the President to appoint additional nominees to the commission's leadership.

Пов'язані матеріали

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

The volume of token buybacks continues to grow, but the minimum price level is constantly declining, according to an internal memo by Bitwise CIO Matt Hogan. He argues that most crypto tokens, except Bitcoin, are undervalued as investors are unaware of the revenue now being returned to holders. He highlights the example of Hyperliquid, which has bought back and burned $1.3 billion worth of its $HYPE token. Hogan posits that tokens are beginning to trade based on revenue, similar to stocks and bonds, marking the end of an era where scaling networks provided little token utility. He links token valuation to strengthening protocol revenue, noting that Hyperliquid has earned over $800 million in the past year and spends nearly all fees on $HYPE buybacks. Following this model, protocols like Uniswap and Aave have implemented fee mechanisms to buy back and burn their own tokens. The trend has also affected base chains like Solana and Aptos, which have proposed or enacted higher fee burns. However, the memo acknowledges that reducing token supply has not reliably boosted prices. A Cryptopolitan report found many tokens with regular buybacks still underperformed the market. Even Hyperliquid's upward trend broke, and Pump.fun conducted significant buybacks near token lows. Hogan cautions that token buybacks differ from stock buybacks due to the lack of contractual claims on profits or assets, as governance rules can always be rewritten.

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

NullReceiver abandons the recording address that made EtherHiding easy to detect

**Sonatype Research Labs has uncovered six malicious npm packages that retrieve command-and-control server addresses from an attacker's Ethereum wallet.** Three of the packages are legitimate, popular libraries that were compromised: `@kolbo/mcp`, `agentgui`, and `godot-kit`. The other three are purely malicious packages: `envpack-conf`, `postcss-initial-provider`, and `tailwindcss-motion-advanced`. All six deploy the same payload. The malware loader queries the Ethereum blockchain for the latest outgoing transaction from a specific wallet. It extracts bytes from the recipient field of that transaction, converts them into two IPv4 addresses, and uses these as primary and backup command-and-control servers. After connecting, it fetches, decodes, and executes a second-stage payload using `eval()` or by spawning a child process. This method, dubbed **"NullReceiver,"** is an evolution of the earlier "EtherHiding" technique. While EtherHiding hid data in transaction fields and sent funds to a fixed "burner" address (creating a monitoring point), NullReceiver sends no funds and generates unique, dynamic receiver addresses, making detection harder. OpenSourceMalware has linked this activity to the North Korean Lazarus group's "Contagious Interview" campaign. Sonatype advises developers to remove the affected package versions immediately and check their systems for signs of secondary payload execution.

cryptonews.ru15 хв тому

NullReceiver abandons the recording address that made EtherHiding easy to detect

cryptonews.ru15 хв тому

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

The cryptocurrency market lost over $14 billion due to hacks and code exploits from 2016 to 2026, according to a CoinGecko report. The year 2026 has seen a significant spike, with 164 separate incidents recorded as of August—a 70% increase from all of 2025. Although the total financial loss for 2026 currently stands at about $1.2 billion, still below the peak of $2.77 billion in 2022, the number of attacks is unprecedented. Analysts attribute this rise to improved tracking methods and increased malicious activity, possibly fueled by advancements in artificial intelligence. Notable 2026 breaches include the April hacks of Drift and Kelp protocols, resulting in losses of $295 million and $293 million, respectively. The Kelp exploit, linked to North Korean hackers, involved minting unbacked tokens via a LayerZero bridge vulnerability, which were then used as collateral on Aave. This triggered a massive withdrawal of liquidity from Aave and the broader DeFi sector, leading to over $20 billion in sector-wide outflows by August, despite the eventual recovery of the stolen Kelp funds. The report also highlights that market reactions to hacks often inflict greater financial damage than the exploits themselves. For instance, following the BonkDAO hack, the token's market cap fell by nearly $140 million, far exceeding the $21 million direct loss. Other examples include the DRIFT token dropping 80% and Step Finance's token losing over 99% of its value, leading to the protocol's bankruptcy. The analysis notes that the real total damage is likely higher, as it excludes individual wallet breaches and broader ecosystem losses.

cryptonews.ru17 хв тому

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

cryptonews.ru17 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片