CertiK Tightens KYC and Strengthens Oversight After Huione Backlash, CEO Denies IPO Plans

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-12

Анотація

CertiK has enhanced its KYC procedures and oversight after facing criticism for auditing a stablecoin project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace last year. CEO Ronghui Gu acknowledged the incident as a turning point, leading to stricter client checks, collaboration with external risk experts, and ongoing monitoring of audit report usage. The firm now prioritizes institution-level standards to meet demands from large financial entities for rigorous code safety proofs and regulator-friendly reports. Gu denied current IPO plans despite investor interest, citing market challenges in valuing Web3 companies. He also highlighted evolving risks, including private key mismanagement, deepfakes, and price manipulation, emphasizing trust-building as critical for institutional partnerships.

Blockchain security firm CertiK says that it has improved its procedures and tightened its checks after facing criticism last year for auditing a project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace. Ronghui Gu, CEO of CertiK, said that this episode became a turning point for the firm.

What really happened

CertiK audited a stablecoin project last year. However, the project has links to Huione, which is a marketplace for illegal activities. Online critics questioned whether the audit happened and whether CertiK should have done more background checks. Ronghui Gu replied to all the critics that the company has audited the software, which was given by a U.S.-registered client, and later audited fee has been donated to the charity, and treated this backlash as a lesson.

After this incident, Gu said that CertiK strengthened its KYC and screening process by checking clients more carefully, working with outside risk experts, and increasing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. He said that the firm now keeps a “very close eye” even after the auditing is done.

While auditing the crypto projects was the core for CertiK to earn, Gu says that these services must now meet the institution-level standards. Large financial firms want deeper testing and stronger proof that code is safe, and a clear report they can show regulators. So meeting those needs is now the top priority for the firm, he said.

Gu’s reply on public listing

In January, Gu spoke at the World Economic Forum, which has increased speculation about the possible public listing. He says that media reports went too far, and right now there is no plan, but yes, the investors are really interested. Adding on, he said the market still doesn’t know how to value Web3 companies properly.

Gu also warned that risks are changing. Previously Hackers attacked the smart contracts, but right now, many problem arises from private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation. He says the firm is still researching the solution for the Deepfakes, which is especially very hard.

For CertiK, building trust is more important because large institutions will only work with companies that they believe in. Gu believes that the Huione moment makes the company stronger for the future and forced to upgrade, improve, and prepare for the stricter expectations from global finance.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Human API Launches Platform Enabling Direct AI-to-Human Task Coordination

TagsCertiKIPO

Пов'язані питання

QWhat changes did CertiK implement after the Huione-related backlash?

ACertiK strengthened its KYC and screening processes by conducting more thorough client checks, collaborating with external risk experts, and enhancing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. The company now maintains ongoing vigilance even after audits are completed.

QHow did CertiK's CEO characterize the Huione incident?

ARonghui Gu described the Huione incident as a turning point for the company that forced them to upgrade and improve their procedures to meet stricter expectations from global financial institutions.

QWhat did Ronghui Gu say about CertiK's potential IPO?

AGu denied current IPO plans, stating that media reports had gone too far with speculation. He acknowledged investor interest but noted that the market still doesn't know how to properly value Web3 companies.

QWhat new types of security risks did Gu highlight as emerging threats?

AGu warned that risks are evolving from smart contract attacks to problems involving private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation, with deepfakes being particularly challenging to address.

QHow did CertiK handle the audit fee from the controversial Huione-linked project?

ACertiK donated the audit fee from the Huione-linked project to charity after the software audit was completed for their U.S.-registered client.

Пов'язані матеріали

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit1 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit1 год тому

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit1 год тому

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit1 год тому

a16z Crypto: A Guide to the CLARITY Act for Crypto Entrepreneurs

The CLARITY Act, a bipartisan crypto market structure bill, has advanced through the Senate Banking Committee, marking a potential historic shift in U.S. digital asset regulation. For years, a lack of clear rules has stifled innovation, pushed development overseas, and exposed consumers to risk. This bill aims to establish a comprehensive framework, providing long-needed regulatory clarity for blockchain networks and digital assets. It builds upon previous legislative efforts like FIT21 and the House version of CLARITY, which gained strong bipartisan support. CLARITY is crucial because it recognizes that blockchain networks are fundamentally different from traditional companies. Networks operate through decentralized, shared rules rather than centralized control. Applying corporate legal frameworks to networks forces them into a centralized model, concentrating power and value. In contrast, decentralized blockchain networks can function as user-owned public infrastructure, distributing value more equitably among participants. The bill seeks to enable the safe launch of networks in the U.S., clarify regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC, oversee crypto exchanges, and enhance consumer protections. Its passage would align U.S. law with the nature of decentralized technology, allowing builders to operate transparently and fund projects domestically without structural compromises due to regulatory uncertainty. Similar to the positive impact seen after the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act, CLARITY could unlock a new wave of innovation, helping the U.S. reclaim leadership in the crypto space while combating fraud and abuse.

链捕手1 год тому

a16z Crypto: A Guide to the CLARITY Act for Crypto Entrepreneurs

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片