Cboe Explores “All-or-None” Options as Event Trading Gains Momentum

ccn.comОпубліковано о 2026-02-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-03

Анотація

Cboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated "all-or-none" options product, according to a source. This binary-style product would pay a fixed return if a specified condition is met and nothing if it is not, mirroring the mechanics of event contracts on prediction-market platforms. The move aims to capture growing retail demand for simpler, event-style trades that are easier to understand than traditional options, which involve complex concepts like implied volatility and time decay. Cboe has previously introduced similar binary products, but they were delisted after failing to attract sustained interest. The exploration comes as regulators, including the CFTC, are drafting new rules for event contracts. Competition in event-style trading is increasing, with platforms like Kalshi and traditional firms like CME Group expanding into this space. Cboe is conducting legal and compliance reviews and has held discussions with retail brokerages and market makers. Key factors to watch include whether Cboe files a formal product proposal, broker adoption, and regulatory developments.

Cboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated options product that would deliver an “all-or-none” payout, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the exchange looks to capture growing retail appetite for simpler, event-style trades that resemble prediction markets.

The proposed structure pays a fixed return if a specified condition is met and pays nothing if it is not. That binary-style payoff mirrors the mechanics used by many event contracts on prediction-market platforms.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

A Simpler Trade for Retail

The appeal is straightforward. Many retail traders struggle with traditional options concepts such as implied volatility and time decay.

A fixed payout tied to a single condition is easier to understand and easier to size, even if the risk is still total loss on the premium paid.

Cboe declined to provide details on specifications or timing, and the report said the initiative remains in early stages.

Cboe Has Been Here Before

The exchange is not new to binary-style contracts. Cboe has previously introduced binary options linked to the S&P 500 and the Cboe Volatility Index in 2008.

However, those earlier products were later delisted after they failed to attract sustained interest and were dominated by professional traders, not the retail audience Cboe is now courting.

Rulemaking Is Catching Up

Cboe’s exploration lands as regulators move to clarify the rules of the road for event contracts in the U.S.

On Jan. 29, Michael Selig, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), said the CFTC plans to draft new regulations for “event contracts,” and will withdraw a prior proposal that would have restricted certain politically and sports-linked contracts.

State-level legal challenges continue to shape the regulatory landscape.

In a separate case, a Massachusetts judge ruled Kalshi could not offer sports-related contracts to Massachusetts residents under the state’s gaming rules, rejecting the firm’s argument that federal derivatives oversight fully preempts state gambling authority.

Cboe did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the proposed all-or-none options would reference specific events, indexes, or other market outcomes.

Competition Is Moving Fast

Prediction markets and event-style trading have expanded sharply in visibility, particularly after recent U.S. election cycles.

Traditional financial firms have started to evaluate how to compete with platforms that package outcomes into simple “yes/no” contracts.

Other major players, including CME Group and FanDuel, have taken steps into the broader “event trading” space as demand grows.

Cboe has held preliminary discussions with retail brokerages and market makers while conducting legal and compliance review, reflecting the reputational baggage associated with “binary options” after past retail fraud scandals in loosely regulated venues.

What To Watch Next

The next signals are practical, not philosophical.

First, whether Cboe moves from internal exploration to a formal product filing, including how it frames the contract terms and eligible underlyings.

Second, whether major brokerages are willing to distribute the product widely, and what suitability and marketing guardrails they require.

Third, the regulatory arc. If the CFTC’s promised event-contract rulemaking produces a clearer framework, it could shape how far “event trading” moves into mainstream retail channels, and how directly exchanges like Cboe can compete with prediction-market platforms.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is Cboe Global Markets exploring in response to growing retail interest in event-style trading?

ACboe Global Markets is exploring a regulated options product that would deliver an 'all-or-none' payout, which pays a fixed return if a specified condition is met and nothing if it is not.

QHow does the proposed 'all-or-none' options product differ from traditional options?

AThe 'all-or-none' options offer a fixed payout tied to a single condition, making them simpler to understand and size compared to traditional options that involve complex concepts like implied volatility and time decay.

QWhat regulatory developments are influencing Cboe's exploration of event-style contracts?

AThe CFTC plans to draft new regulations for 'event contracts' and will withdraw a prior proposal that would have restricted certain politically and sports-linked contracts, which could shape the framework for such products.

QWhy did Cboe's previous binary-style contracts fail to gain traction?

ACboe's earlier binary options linked to the S&P 500 and the Cboe Volatility Index were delisted after failing to attract sustained interest and were dominated by professional traders rather than the retail audience.

QWhat are the key factors to watch regarding the future of Cboe's 'all-or-none' options?

AKey factors include whether Cboe moves to a formal product filing, the willingness of major brokerages to distribute the product, and the regulatory framework from the CFTC's event-contract rulemaking.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit49 хв тому

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit49 хв тому

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News1 год тому

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News1 год тому

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

**Summary of TechFlow Intelligence Report:** The newsletter covers several key tech and finance developments. In AI, Anthropic's new Fable model faced backlash for secretly limiting biomedical research capabilities and enforcing a 30-day data retention policy, prompting the company to promise more transparent adjustments. In a related story, Anthropic's founder revealed his departure from OpenAI was due to dishonesty from Sam Altman, not safety concerns. Meanwhile, OpenAI is considering significant price cuts to compete with Anthropic, potentially sparking a price war. In crypto/Web3, BlackRock filed a new amendment for a yield-generating Bitcoin ETF, while Bank of America's CEO warned that stablecoin yields could drain trillions from traditional banks. U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis advocated for the U.S. to officially accumulate Bitcoin reserves. In hardware, Nvidia released the DiffusionGemma-2-6B image model optimized for efficient inference, and AMD promoted its unified memory architecture to challenge Nvidia's dominance. TSMC's CFO hinted at possible price increases due to soaring AI chip demand. A major legal ruling in Germany held Google legally responsible for inaccurate information generated by its AI Overviews feature. Google Chrome also moved to fully block ad-blocker workarounds like uBlock Origin. Macroeconomic headlines included U.S. CPI rising to 4.2% (a 3-year high) and Iran's complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz, raising oil price and inflation fears. South Korean markets saw continued volatility with massive foreign capital outflow. Other notable stories: Microsoft expanded its Copilot AI assistant "Mico" globally; a study found r/wallstreetbets users' stock picks outperformed Wall Street; a fully autonomous drone killed a human soldier for the first time, raising AI ethics concerns; and a Chinese hospital used brain-computer interface technology to help a blind person "see." The overarching theme connects debates over AI boundaries and responsibility (Anthropic's restrictions, Google's liability, lethal autonomous drones) with real-world economic and geopolitical turmoil (inflation, Strait of Hormuz closure, market instability), highlighting the tense interplay between technological advancement and global chaos.

marsbit1 год тому

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Anthropic's New Model Fable Sparks Controversy by Restricting Biosafety Research, US CPI Soars to 4.2%, a Three-Year High

marsbit1 год тому

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

Alibaba has established a new "Token Foundry" business unit, merging its Tongyi large model division and Future Life Lab. Led directly by Group CEO Wu Yongming, this marks the company's third significant AI organizational reshuffle in 2026, following the creation of the Alibaba Token Hub (ATH) and a Group Technology Committee. The move signals a strategic shift from consolidating AI resources to accelerating productization and commercialization. The "Token Foundry" name reflects Alibaba's ambition to become a foundational supplier in the AI era, focusing on model development and commercial application. Key teams, including those behind the high-performing HappyHorse video generation model, have been integrated into the new unit. Concurrently, Zhou Jingren, architect of the Qwen model series, has been appointed Group Chief Scientist to lead a new AI Future Research Institute, focusing on long-term technological breakthroughs like Agent capabilities. This restructuring creates a clear four-layer AI architecture within Alibaba: the research institute for frontier exploration, Token Foundry for core models and commercialization, MaaS for platform services, and business units like Qianwen (C端) and Wukong (B端) for end-user applications. The adjustments align with a global trend among tech giants like Google and Microsoft to centralize AI leadership under the CEO and deeply integrate research with business units. The urgency is driven by a narrowing competitive window. Alibaba has announced its AI business is now entering a commercialization phase, with AI-related revenue seeing triple-digit growth for eleven consecutive quarters. The company faces intense competition in the MaaS (Model-as-a-Service) sector from rivals like ByteDance and Tencent. The Token Foundry initiative represents Alibaba's effort to streamline execution and enhance competitiveness in this critical, fast-evolving landscape.

marsbit2 год тому

Alibaba's Yet Another New Business Division: What Signal Does It Send?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片