Can Solana’s $900M stablecoin surge help SOL clear $145?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-08Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-08

Анотація

Stablecoins are increasingly seen as indicators of capital positioning across blockchain networks, not just as a market hedge. Solana has experienced a significant $900 million surge in stablecoin supply, signaling strong structural rather than speculative demand. This growth is supported by Solana becoming the leading chain for tokenized stocks, with a record $800 million market cap and a 17% increase in 30-day RWA value. The network's on-chain activity is robust, with Daily Active Addresses up 55% year-to-date, far outperforming Ethereum. SOL's price has risen 8% in 2026 but faces key resistance at $145. The influx of stablecoin liquidity, combined with major developments like Jupiter's on-chain stablecoin launch and Morgan Stanley's spot SOL ETF filing, could provide the catalyst needed for SOL to break this resistance and continue its upward trend.

Stablecoins are no longer just a market hedge.

In the past, sharp jumps in USDT or USDC supply were viewed as bearish, signaling a shift toward a risk-off mood. In simple terms, more stablecoins often meant investors were sidelining liquidity rather than deploying it.

However, that narrative has evolved. Today, stablecoins reflect how capital is being positioned across different L1s. In this context, Solana’s [SOL] recent $900 million increase in stablecoin supply clearly stands out.

As the chart shows, SOL has outrun every other chain in stablecoin inflows. More importantly, the timing suggests this move isn’t a fluke. Instead, it indicates that the capital flowing in is more structural than speculative.

Backing this, Solana recently became the largest chain by market cap for tokenized stocks, with the combined value reaching a record $800 million. Meanwhile, its 30-day RWA value is leading the top three chains, up 17%.

Taken together, these trends suggest that the stablecoin inflow is tied to real on-chain demand. However, the key question remains: Will this capital translate into price action, helping SOL finally break key resistance?

Stablecoin supply strengthens Solana’s bullish case

Solana has kicked off 2026 by clearly diverging from its 2025 performance.

On-chain, the network is seeing strong activity, with Daily Active Addresses (new wallets) jumping 55% year-to-date. For context, that’s a massive outperformance compared to Ethereum [ETH], which is up just 0.3%.

Notably, the price chart tells a similar story. SOL is up 8% so far in 2026, roughly twice the ROI of ETH. That said, looking closer at the weekly trend, SOL is moving up but now facing a key resistance around $145.

In this context, the recent jump in stablecoin supply starts to matter.

With strong on-chain fundamentals, solid relative performance, and capital flowing across sectors, this extra liquidity could be the catalyst Solana needs to finally break out of its 8-week sideways chop.

What’s more, the surge in liquidity lines up with big developments: Jupiter launched its on-chain stablecoin, and Morgan Stanley filed for a spot SOL ETF.

All of this adds weight to the case for Solana to break resistance.


Final Thoughts

  • Stablecoin inflows and strong on-chain activity highlight structural demand for Solana, setting the stage for a potential breakout.
  • Recent market developments add further weight to the bullish case.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat does the recent $900 million increase in stablecoin supply on Solana indicate, according to the article?

AIt indicates that the capital flowing in is more structural than speculative, reflecting real on-chain demand and how capital is being positioned across different L1s.

QHow has Solana's performance in Daily Active Addresses compared to Ethereum's so far in 2026?

ASolana's Daily Active Addresses (new wallets) have jumped 55% year-to-date, massively outperforming Ethereum, which is up just 0.3%.

QWhat key resistance level is SOL facing on its weekly price chart?

ASOL is facing a key resistance level around $145 on its weekly price chart.

QWhat two recent major developments are mentioned that align with the surge in liquidity on Solana?

AJupiter launched its on-chain stablecoin, and Morgan Stanley filed for a spot SOL ETF.

QWhat record did Solana recently achieve in the realm of tokenized stocks?

ASolana recently became the largest chain by market cap for tokenized stocks, with the combined value reaching a record $800 million.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit30 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit30 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit49 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit49 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit58 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit58 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片