Business owner faces up to 280 years over $24M crypto Ponzi scheme

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2026-08-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-25

Анотація

A Las Vegas business owner, Brent Kovar, faces a potential maximum sentence of 280 years in prison after being convicted by a federal jury for orchestrating a $24 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme. Kovar, who operated Profit Connect from late 2017 to July 2021, falsely claimed the company used AI and a supercomputer for crypto mining and transaction verification. He promised investors annual returns of 15% to 30% and a money-back guarantee, asserting the company held massive crypto reserves. Prosecutors revealed the business was unprofitable, held no such reserves, and used new investor funds to pay earlier investors, cover operational costs, and for personal expenses like a house purchase. Kovar was found guilty on multiple counts of wire fraud, mail fraud, and money laundering. His sentencing is scheduled for November 30.

A business owner in Las Vegas faces a statutory maximum sentence of 280 years in prison after a federal jury convicted him of running a $24 million crypto Ponzi scheme that defrauded at least 400 investors.

The US Justice Department said Monday that Brent Kovar was found guilty of 11 counts of wire fraud, two counts of mail fraud and two counts of money laundering following a nine-day trial.

Kovar owned Profit Connect from late 2017 to July 2021. The company purportedly used artificial intelligence software on a supercomputer to mine crypto and verify other crypto transactions.

Kovar falsely presented the company as profitable and promised fixed annual returns ranging from 15% to 30%, along with a 100% money-back guarantee. He also claimed that Profit Connect held hundreds of millions of dollars in crypto reserves.

Prosecutors said the company was not profitable and held no such reserves. It also had no legitimate means to deliver the promised returns or money-back guarantee.

Instead, Kovar used investor money to operate Profit Connect, buy gifts for employees, purchase a house for himself and repay earlier investors while presenting the payments as proceeds from crypto activities.

Kovar is scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 30. The 280-year figure represents the combined statutory maximum, while a federal judge will determine his sentence.

Related: DOJ moves to dismiss charges against alleged $722M BitClub fraudster: Report

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was Brent Kovar convicted of by a federal jury?

ABrent Kovar was convicted of 11 counts of wire fraud, two counts of mail fraud, and two counts of money laundering.

QWhat was the name of the company Kovar owned and what did it purportedly do?

AKovar owned Profit Connect, a company that purportedly used artificial intelligence software on a supercomputer to mine crypto and verify other crypto transactions.

QWhat false promises did Kovar make to investors of Profit Connect?

AKovar falsely promised investors fixed annual returns ranging from 15% to 30%, along with a 100% money-back guarantee, and claimed the company held hundreds of millions of dollars in crypto reserves.

QHow did Kovar actually use the investor money according to prosecutors?

AProsecutors said Kovar used investor money to operate Profit Connect, buy gifts for employees, purchase a house for himself, and repay earlier investors while presenting the payments as proceeds from crypto activities.

QWhat is the statutory maximum prison sentence Kovar faces and when is his sentencing scheduled?

AKovar faces a statutory maximum sentence of 280 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for November 30.

Пов'язані матеріали

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

Ethereum developers have proposed a new system for handling staking deposits, aiming to future-proof the network against the potential threat of quantum computers. Currently, Ethereum's security relies on elliptic curve cryptography, which could be broken by sufficiently powerful quantum machines capable of deriving private keys from public ones. While estimates of the timeline for this threat vary, with Google research in March 2026 suggesting it could be closer than previously thought, major blockchains are proactively preparing. The new proposal introduces a more flexible deposit contract capable of accepting keys of various types and lengths, identified by a scheme label. It also changes how deposit data is communicated within the network's layers. Crucially, the transition plan involves a three-phase process to ensure a controlled and predictable shift, initially disabling new deposits, then re-enabling the current format, and finally permanently switching to new post-quantum cryptography in a future update. The proposal is currently a draft with no set implementation date. It represents a strategic move to build infrastructure in advance, rather than a direct solution for existing accounts. Analysis notes that Ethereum is structurally vulnerable to a "store now, decrypt later" attack, as public keys revealed in past transactions remain permanently on-chain. This proposal prepares for a signature algorithm change but does not address the risk to keys already exposed.

cryptonews.ru11 хв тому

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

cryptonews.ru11 хв тому

Meta Faces a $1.4 Trillion Penalty: Algorithmic Recommendation in the Dock. Will the Rules Change in the Second Half of the Internet Era?

A landmark federal trial in Oakland, California, has begun against Meta, with 29 states accusing the company of harming children and teens through its social media platform designs. The states seek a potential maximum penalty of $1.4 trillion, calculated from alleged repeated violations of consumer protection laws and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) involving millions of underage users. The core legal strategy bypasses the traditional shield of Section 230 by targeting Meta's own platform features—like its recommendation algorithms, infinite scroll, and "like" buttons—rather than user-generated content. The plaintiffs argue these designs are addictive and deceptive. Meta denies the claims, calling the penalty "unprecedented" and disputing the methodology. While the astronomical $1.4 trillion figure is seen as a starting point for negotiations, even a significantly reduced penalty in the hundreds of billions could establish a critical precedent. The case focuses on holding platforms legally responsible for their algorithmic designs. A ruling against Meta could force product changes, such as removing "likes" or imposing usage limits, and provide a legal template for similar suits against other tech giants like TikTok and YouTube. The trial's outcome may redefine accountability for algorithm-driven business models across the internet.

marsbit21 хв тому

Meta Faces a $1.4 Trillion Penalty: Algorithmic Recommendation in the Dock. Will the Rules Change in the Second Half of the Internet Era?

marsbit21 хв тому

A Precedent for the Prediction Markets: CFTC Aims to Prove Authority Over Polymarket via Criminal Case

A U.S. Army soldier, Gannon Ken Van Dyke, who earned $400,000 using non-public information on the crypto event-prediction platform Polymarket, is contesting the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) attempt to intervene in his criminal case. The CFTC, which initiated a separate civil suit against Van Dyke but has not pursued it to trial, seeks to submit arguments in the ongoing criminal proceeding. Van Dyke's lawyers filed a motion opposing this, arguing the CFTC is improperly trying to influence the criminal case as an outside expert rather than through its own lawsuit. They contend that event contracts traded on platforms like Polymarket are not swaps and thus fall outside the CFTC's jurisdiction, calling the regulator's tactics a procedural maneuver. Van Dyke faces criminal fraud charges for allegedly trading based on confidential information about potential regime change in Venezuela. His civil case with the CFTC is stayed pending the criminal trial, expected in late 2026 or early 2027. The court's decision on whether to allow the CFTC's intervention could set a precedent for how such event contracts are regulated. An AI analysis notes inconsistency in the CFTC's approach compared to a similar case involving a Google employee, raising questions about the legal strategy for the prediction market industry, which includes platforms like Kalshi. The outcome may define future regulatory standards for the entire market.

cryptonews.ru26 хв тому

A Precedent for the Prediction Markets: CFTC Aims to Prove Authority Over Polymarket via Criminal Case

cryptonews.ru26 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片