Brokerage Giant Charles Schwab Rolls Out Spot Crypto Trading To Retail Investors

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-05-14Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-14

Анотація

Charles Schwab has officially launched its spot crypto trading platform, Schwab Crypto, to a select group of retail investors in the US, excluding New York and Louisiana. The service allows direct trading of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) with a 75-basis-point fee, linked to clients' brokerage accounts. Schwab Premier Bank will serve as custodian, with Paxos handling trade execution. The firm plans to add more assets and transfer capabilities. This move expands Schwab's offerings beyond indirect crypto investment products. It follows a trend of major institutions entering the space, as Morgan Stanley also recently launched a crypto trading pilot on its E*Trade platform with a 50-basis-point fee, aiming for wider rollout later this year.

Brokerage and banking firm Charles Schwab officially began rolling out its crypto trading platform to retail clients in the US, joining the list of traditional financial institutions expanding their digital asset offering.

Schwab Launches Spot Trading For BTC, ETH

On Tuesday, the $11.7 trillion brokerage giant Charles Schwab revealed that it officially launched its spot digital asset trading platform, Schwab Crypto, to a select group of retail customers.

According to the X announcement, the first group of clients can trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) directly on its platform alongside their other digital asset-related investment products.

The crypto trading platform is available in all US states, excluding New York and Louisiana, and will charge a 75-basis-point fee on the dollar value of each trade, which is among the lowest in the industry.

Last month, the firm revealed the platform would be introduced in phases, starting with an internal employee pilot, moving to a client waitlist, and then opening to eligible customers throughout the rest of 2026.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the company explained that Schwab clients will maintain separate accounts under the new platform, which will be linked directly to their brokerage accounts.

Notably, Charles Schwab Premier Bank (CSPB) will serve as the custodian for customers’ assets, handling safekeeping and record-keeping. Meanwhile, blockchain infrastructure provider Paxos will handle trade execution and sub-custody, using a federally overseen trust model and enterprise-grade technology

The brokerage giant also revealed plans to add additional digital assets to the platform and introduce transfer capabilities for both deposits and withdrawals, allowing clients with existing digital asset investments to bring them to Schwab alongside their other accounts.

Jonathan Craig, Head of Retail Investing at Charles Schwab, previously noted that with Schwab Crypto, the firm seeks to allow clients who want direct access to the asset class to benefit from the service, educational resources, and research tools they expect from the company.

Traditional Institutions Expand Crypto Offerings

This move marks a major expansion from Schwab’s previous digital asset-related offerings, which included indirect exposure to investments through spot crypto Exchange-traded products (ETPs), futures, options on spot crypto ETPs, crypto-related ETFs, and mutual funds that invest in the broader digital asset ecosystem. Schwab clients hold approximately 20% of spot crypto ETPs, the firm noted.

Moreover, the launch comes as major banks and brokerages race to add digital‐asset products and integrate crypto into mainstream investing, with several firms expanding retail digital asset offerings in recent years.

Last week, Wall Street behemoth Morgan Stanley also launched a crypto trading pilot on its E*Trade platform to a limited number of users, seeking to challenge major players, including Schwab, with competitive pricing.

The banking giant is charging E*Trade users a 50-basis-point fee on the transaction value, placing its prices below Robinhood’s 95 basis points, Coinbase’s 60 basis points, and Schwab’s 75 basis points.

While the pilot is currently available only to a limited group, Morgan Stanley expects to expand access to all of E*Trade’s 8.6 million clients later this year. The bank’s executives are reportedly preparing an offering to directly convert digital assets into shares of ETPs without selling the assets, and planning to add the ability to trade tokenized equities in the second half of 2026.

Jed Finn, Morgan Stanley’s head of wealth management, affirmed that the launch is “much bigger than trading crypto at a cheaper rate,” explaining that their strategy is “disintermediating the disintermediators.”

The total crypto market capitalization is at $2.63 trillion in the one-week chart. Source: TOTAL on TradingView

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name of the new crypto trading platform launched by Charles Schwab and which two major cryptocurrencies can users trade on it?

AThe new platform is called Schwab Crypto. Users can trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) directly on the platform.

QWhat is the trading fee charged by Charles Schwab on its Schwab Crypto platform, and how does it compare to competitors like Coinbase and Morgan Stanley?

ACharles Schwab charges a 75-basis-point (0.75%) fee on the dollar value of each trade on Schwab Crypto. This is higher than Morgan Stanley's 50 basis points but lower than Coinbase's 60 basis points for its users.

QWhat two US states are currently excluded from accessing the Schwab Crypto platform?

AThe Schwab Crypto platform is available in all US states, excluding New York and Louisiana.

QWhat are the roles of Charles Schwab Premier Bank (CSPB) and Paxos in the operation of the Schwab Crypto platform?

ACharles Schwab Premier Bank (CSPB) serves as the custodian for customers' assets, handling safekeeping and record-keeping. Blockchain infrastructure provider Paxos handles trade execution and sub-custody.

QWhat is the stated strategic goal of Morgan Stanley's crypto launch on E*Trade, according to Jed Finn, its head of wealth management?

AJed Finn stated that the launch is 'much bigger than trading crypto at a cheaper rate,' explaining that their strategy is 'disintermediating the disintermediators.'

Пов'язані матеріали

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3 хв тому

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3 хв тому

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手26 хв тому

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手26 хв тому

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit59 хв тому

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit59 хв тому

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 год тому

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片