Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-04

Анотація

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Amid the ongoing market downturn, Strategy and Bitmine, known as the 'Twin Pillars of the DAT Treasury,' have both incurred massive unrealized losses.

This morning, BTC once fell below $62,000 and is currently hovering around $63,800; ETH broke below $1,800, currently trading around $1,780. At current prices, Strategy's unrealized loss has reached a staggering $100 billion; Bitmine's unrealized loss is also around $90 billion. For the moment, Michael Saylor and Tom Lee find themselves 'companions in misfortune,' while Strategy and Bitmine have become the top two 'DAT companies with the most losses.'

However, compared to Strategy, which must continuously pay dividends, Bitmine faces less financial pressure and retains flexibility, such as funding through STRC preferred stock issuance. It is reported that Bitmine plans to raise $300 million by issuing perpetual preferred stock with an annual dividend yield of 9.5%. This suggests that Bitmine continues to increase its ETH holdings; whereas the sword of Damocles hanging over Strategy is—where will the funds for subsequent STRC dividend payments come from? Between the two, who faces greater financial pressure? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze for its readers.

Bitmine VS Strategy: Divergent Paths in Holding DAT

With today's sharp drop in BTC, community members used AI to mock Saylor's 'endorsement' of BTC: 'A sixty-year-old man personally endorses, ancestral BTC price as low as $62,000 per coin.'

Returning to Bitmine and Strategy, currently, Bitmine's financial structure appears safer; whereas Strategy's leverage pressure is greater.

Bitmine's Equity Issuance Game: A Debt-Free DAT Financing Play

As of June 1st, Bitmine holds 5,416,901 ETH, accounting for approximately 4.49% of ETH's total supply, nearing the '5% upper limit' repeatedly emphasized by Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee. Yesterday, Bitmine acquired another 25,000 ETH via BitGo , valued at $48 million at the time. Currently, its holdings stand at 5,441,901 ETH.

The reason Bitmine maintains the confidence to continue increasing holdings during a market downturn is multifaceted. The primary reason is that Bitmine's funding source is equity issuance:

  • When initiating the establishment of the ETH treasury DAT company in June last year, Bitmine obtained initial startup capital—$250 million—through financing, along with a small PIPE round.
  • After July last year, Bitmine primarily relied on ATM equity offerings, gradually increasing this amount from $2 billion to $24.5 billion.

Ample funds give Tom Lee sufficient confidence, and Bitmine's book capital supports further acquisitions—in its June 1st public announcement, Bitmine also mentioned: The company's stake in Beast Industries is valued at $180 million; its stake in Eightco Holdings is valued at $93 million. The company's total cash amounts to $446 million.

Furthermore, Tom Lee has previously flaunted that Bitmine's Ethereum treasury generates approximately $1 million in daily staking rewards. This refers to Bitmine staking about 87% (approximately 4.71 million ETH) of its ETH holdings through its MAVAN staking network, with an estimated annualized return of about 2.73%-3% (approximately $250-300 million), which also provides a relatively stable cash flow.

In summary, Bitmine's financial condition is sound; and the latest preferred stock financing, offering a 9.5% annual dividend and expected to raise $300 million, will further alleviate its financial pressure. For the company, the greatest risks lie in equity dilution (issuing new shares) and further stock price decline caused by book unrealized losses. If mNVA consistently remains <1, it might trigger stock sell-offs.

Strategy's Debt Leverage Game: Pressure from Convertible Bonds and Preferred Stock Dividends

Compared to Bitmine's 'using investor money to buy ETH,' Strategy faces greater financial pressure in acquiring BTC, as it primarily 'borrows money to increase BTC holdings.'

According to Strategy's official website, the company currently holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible bond debt, plus about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred stock and STRD, STRK, STRF with varying market capitalizations, requiring substantial annual dividend and interest payments. At the end of May, after repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible debt, Strategy's cash reserves dropped to about $871 million, covering only about 6 months of its projected $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligations.

Moreover, Strategy previously initiated a vote proposing to 'increase STRC dividend payments from once a month to twice a month.' The voting began on April 28th and will conclude on the meeting date of June 8th. If approved, the new schedule's first record date would be June 30th, with the first payment date on July 15th. Eligible voting shareholders (MSTR and STRC shareholders) must have held shares by April 17th.

Additionally, it is worth noting that STRC's authorized issuance limit is approximately $283 billion. Possibly affected by BTC's continuous decline and shaken market confidence, STRC fell below $95 this morning, currently trading at $94.65, 'de-pegging' more than 5% from its $100 target price.

Compared to Bitmine, Strategy currently faces a significant gap between high preferred stock financing amounts and dividend payments, exacerbated by BTC's continued decline. Unlike ETH, which has staking ecosystems to generate more liquidity, BTC lacks such options.

Therefore, after Strategy sold 32 BTC last month, the market began to doubt its identity as the 'diamond hands Strategy that only buys and never sells.' During BTC's persistent decline, Strategy may face a series of liquidity crises, leading to an inability to service debt and dividends, and consequently selling more BTC, further depressing the market. Essentially, Strategy is playing a high-leverage game betting that 'BTC's price will not fall below a certain level.'

Thus, considering Strategy's current mNAV value of 0.83, the market remains highly skeptical about its future stock performance. Yesterday, its market capitalization already fell out of the top 200 US companies. Currently, Strategy (MSTR) stock is trading at $126, down 7% in 24 hours; market capitalization is approximately $446 billion.

Of course, as a leading DAT treasury company, Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee remains quite optimistic about Strategy, previously stating: 'Strategy selling Bitcoin and ETF outflows are typical bottoming behaviors, not risk signals.' At the recent 'Proof of Talk 2026' conference at the Louvre in Paris, Tom Lee made an even bolder statement: 'With AI and tokenization driving major changes in financial infrastructure, ETH could ultimately reach $250,000.' However, when discussing 'Bitmine's actions after its ETH holdings reach 5% of the total supply,' he also expressed caution about further increasing ETH holdings. (Details in 'Tom Lee Recharges Faith: Crypto Spring Has Arrived, ETH Will Rise to $250,000')

Currently, Bitmine and Strategy find themselves in highly similar market situations, though Bitmine's financial condition is slightly better; Strategy faces the choice between 'selling more BTC for cash flow to pay dividends' and 'standing by as BTC continues to fall, either borrowing more to increase holdings or remaining inactive.'

Пов'язані питання

QWhat are the main financial pressures facing Strategy according to the article?

AStrategy faces significant financial pressure primarily due to its high leverage. It holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible debt and about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred shares, requiring substantial annual interest and dividend payments. Its cash reserves have dropped to around $871 million, which can only cover about six months of its estimated $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligation. The continuous fall in BTC price exacerbates the gap between its high dividend payments and financing needs, potentially leading to a liquidity crisis.

QHow does Bitmine's method of funding its ETH purchases differ from Strategy's method of acquiring BTC?

ABitmine primarily funds its ETH purchases through equity issuance, including an initial raise of $250 million, subsequent ATM equity offerings (increased to $24.5 billion), and a planned $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy largely relies on debt financing, such as issuing convertible bonds and preferred shares, to acquire BTC. This makes Bitmine's approach a 'debt-free' equity financing model, while Strategy engages in a 'high-leverage debt game'.

QWhat potential risk does Bitmine face despite its relatively safer financial structure?

ADespite its safer financial structure, Bitmine's main risk lies in equity dilution from issuing new shares and a potential further decline in its stock price if its market-to-net asset value (mNAV) ratio remains below 1. A sustained mNAV

QWhat action did Strategy take in May that raised market concerns about its 'diamond hands' reputation?

AIn May, Strategy sold 32 Bitcoins. This action caused the market to doubt its long-held 'diamond hands' identity as a company that 'only buys and never sells' Bitcoin.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated current floating loss for both Bitmine and Strategy?

AAccording to the article, at current prices, Strategy's floating loss has reached around $100 billion, while Bitmine's floating loss is approximately $90 billion.

Пов'язані матеріали

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit1 год тому

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit1 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit1 год тому

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit1 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit1 год тому

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit1 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit1 год тому

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片