Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-06-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-04

Анотація

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser2010)

Amid the ongoing market decline, Strategy and Bitmine, the "Twin Titans of DAT Treasuries," have both incurred massive floating losses.

This morning, BTC briefly fell below $62,000, currently hovering around $63,800; ETH dropped below $1,800, currently around $1,780. At current prices, Strategy's floating loss has reached a staggering $10 billion; Bitmine's floating loss is also around $9 billion. For now, Michael Saylor and Tom Lee are "fellow sufferers in the same predicament," with Strategy and Bitmine ranking as the top two "DAT companies with the largest losses."

However, compared to Strategy, which requires continuous dividend payments, Bitmine faces less financial pressure and retains flexibility such as raising funds through STRC preferred shares. It is reported that Bitmine plans to raise $300 million by issuing perpetual preferred shares with an annual dividend yield of 9.5%. It seems Bitmine's pace of acquiring ETH continues; meanwhile, the Sword of Damocles hanging over Strategy becomes: Where will the funds for subsequent STRC dividend payments come from? Between the two, who faces greater financial pressure? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze for readers.

Bitmine VS Strategy: The Divergent Paths of DAT Holdings

Following today's BTC plunge, community members used AI to mock Saylor's "promotion" of BTC: "A man in his sixties personally promotes, ancestral BTC price drops to $62,000 per coin."

Returning to Bitmine and Strategy, currently, Bitmine's financial structure appears safer; whereas Strategy's leverage pressure is greater.

Bitmine's Equity Issuance Game: The Debt-Free DAT Financing Play

As of June 1, Bitmine holds 5,416,901 ETH; accounting for approximately 4.49% of ETH's total supply, nearing the '5% cap' repeatedly emphasized by Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee. Yesterday, Bitmine once again acquired 25,000 ETH via BitGo, valued at $48 million at the time. Currently, its holdings stand at 5,441,901 ETH.

The reason Bitmine has the confidence to continue accumulating during a market downturn is multifaceted. The primary reason is that Bitmine's funding source is equity issuance:

  • When initiating its ETH treasury and establishing the DAT company in June last year, Bitmine obtained initial seed capital through financing — $250 million, along with a small PIPE financing.
  • After July last year, Bitmine primarily relied on ATM equity issuance, gradually increasing this figure from $2 billion to $24.5 billion.

Sufficient funds give Tom Lee ample confidence, and Bitmine's book cash supports further acquisitions — in its June 1 public announcement, Bitmine also mentioned: The company's stake in Beast Industries is valued at $180 million; its stake in Eightco Holdings is valued at $93 million. The company's total cash amounts to $446 million.

Additionally, Tom Lee has previously boasted that Bitmine's Ethereum treasury generates daily staking rewards of $1 million. This refers to Bitmine staking approximately 87% (about 4.71 million ETH) of its ETH holdings through its MAVAN staking network, with estimated annualized returns of about 2.73%-3% (approximately $250-$300 million), which can also provide relatively stable cash flow.

In summary, Bitmine's financial condition is sound; and the latest preferred share financing with a 9.5% annualized dividend is expected to secure $300 million, further alleviating its financial pressure. For this company, the biggest risk points lie in equity dilution (issuing new shares) and further stock price declines due to book floating losses. If mNVA remains <1, it might trigger stock selling.

Strategy's Debt Leverage Game: Pressure from Convertible Bonds and Preferred Share Dividends

Compared to Bitmine's "using investors' money to buy ETH," Strategy faces greater financial pressure in acquiring BTC because it primarily "borrows money to increase BTC holdings."

According to information on Strategy's official website, currently, Strategy holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible bond debt, plus about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred shares and market-value-varying amounts of STRD, STRK, STRF, requiring annual massive dividend and interest payments. At the end of May, after repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible debt, Strategy's cash reserves fell to about $871 million, covering only about 6 months of its estimated $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligation.

Moreover, Strategy previously initiated a vote on "proposing to increase STRC dividend payments from monthly to twice monthly." The voting began on April 28 and will conclude on the meeting day of June 8. If approved, the first record date under the new schedule is June 30, and the first payment date is July 15. Eligible voting shareholders (holders of MSTR and STRC shares) must have held shares before April 17.

Also worth mentioning is that STRC's authorized issuance cap is approximately $28.3 billion. Possibly affected by BTC's continuous decline and shaken market confidence, STRC fell below $95 this morning, currently at $94.65, "de-pegging" over 5% from the $100 target price.

Compared to Bitmine, Strategy currently faces a significant gap between excessive preferred share financing amounts and dividend payments, exacerbated by BTC's continuous decline. Furthermore, unlike ETH which has a staking ecosystem for additional liquidity, BTC lacks such options.

Therefore, after Strategy sold 32 BTC last month, the market began to doubt the identity of "diamond-handed Strategy that only buys and never sells." Amid BTC's persistent decline, Strategy might face a series of liquidity crises, leading to an inability to repay debts and dividends, thereby selling more BTC and driving down prices. Essentially, Strategy is playing a "high-leverage bet that the BTC price won't fall below a certain level" debt leverage game.

Thus, considering Strategy's current mNAV value of 0.83, the market remains highly skeptical of its future stock performance. Yesterday, its market capitalization already fell out of the top 200 US companies. Currently, Strategy (MSTR) stock is at $126, down 7% in 24 hours; market cap stands at $44.6 billion.

Of course, as a leader among DAT treasury companies, Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee remains quite optimistic about Strategy, previously stating: "Strategy selling Bitcoin and ETF outflows are typical bottoming behavior, not risk signals." At the recent "Proof of Talk 2026" conference at the Louvre in Paris, Tom Lee made bold claims: "With AI and tokenization driving major changes in financial infrastructure, ETH could ultimately reach $250,000." However, when discussing "Bitmine's actions after its ETH holdings reach 5% of the total supply," he also expressed caution about further ETH accumulation. (See "Tom Lee Recharges Faith: Crypto Spring Has Arrived, ETH Will Rise to $250,000")

Currently, Bitmine and Strategy find themselves in highly similar market situations, but Bitmine's financial condition is slightly better; Strategy faces the choice between "selling more BTC to obtain cash flow for dividend payments" and "sitting idle or continuing to borrow for acquisition as BTC keeps falling."

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what is the main difference in how Bitmine and Strategy finance their digital asset acquisitions?

ABitmine primarily funds its ETH acquisitions through equity issuance (ATM offerings and stock sales), which is a debt-free method. In contrast, Strategy primarily uses debt leverage, including convertible notes and preferred stock, to finance its BTC purchases, creating significant interest and dividend obligations.

QWhat specific financial pressure does Strategy face that the article highlights as its 'sword of Damocles'?

AStrategy faces significant pressure to cover its substantial annual dividend payments for its preferred stock (like STRC), estimated at $1.7 billion. With its cash reserves dwindling, the core question is where the funds for these ongoing dividend payments will come from.

QHow does Bitmine generate an additional income stream from its ETH holdings, as mentioned in the article?

ABitmine stakes approximately 87% of its ETH holdings (around 4.71 million ETH) through the MAVAN staking network. This generates daily staking rewards estimated at $1 million, providing a stable annualized cash flow of approximately $250-300 million.

QWhat are the key risk factors mentioned for Bitmine and Strategy's stock prices respectively?

AFor Bitmine, the main risk is equity dilution from issuing new shares and a declining stock price if its mNVA (market value to net asset value) falls below 1. For Strategy, the key risk is its high leverage and liquidity crisis if BTC prices fall further, potentially forcing asset sales and causing its mNAV to drop (currently 0.83), which could severely impact its stock price.

QWhat recent action by Strategy has caused market doubts about its 'diamond hands' reputation, and what potential consequence does the article suggest?

AStrategy recently sold 32 BTC. This action has led the market to doubt its long-held 'diamond hands' (never selling) policy. The article suggests that if BTC continues to fall, Strategy might face a liquidity crisis, forcing it to sell more BTC to meet its debt and dividend obligations, which could further depress the market.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit11 хв тому

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit11 хв тому

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit23 хв тому

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit23 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit1 год тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片