Bittensor (TAO) Loses Support: Are Traders Eyeing the Next Downside Levels?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-19

Анотація

Bittensor (TAO) is trading around $245.36, down 8.28% in 24 hours, with a daily trading volume of $349.48 million. Despite a 15.59% weekly gain, the price faces potential downside risks, with support near $239.46. A further drop could lead to a death cross, pushing prices below $232.19. A bullish reversal might test resistance at $253.74, possibly rising above $260 with a golden cross. Technical indicators are mixed: MACD shows a bearish trend with a potential reversal attempt. The CMF at -0.09 indicates mild selling pressure, while the Bull Bear Power of -33.8 reflects strong bearish momentum. The RSI at 37.40 suggests bearish sentiment but not yet oversold. If it nears 30, a short bounce may occur. Overall, sellers currently dominate, but a bullish turnaround is possible if buying pressure increases.

At press time, Bittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours. Notably, the daily trading volume has reached the $349.48 million zone. The opening price of the asset was at $274.84, and gradually, it hit a low for the day at around $246.

Over the last 7-days, the price chart of TAO reveals its bullish wave, with a 15.59% surge. It opened the week, trading on the downside and followed by multiple ups and downs; it managed to climb higher.

Upon the momentum correction steadily happening on the downside, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range. A continuous loss may trigger the formation of the death cross, and it could push the asset’s price below $232.19. If a bullish reversal emerges for Bittensor, the price could see a move upward, immediately testing the resistance at around $253.74. Assuming the price reinforces, with the emergence of the golden cross, it likely drives the price above $260.

Will the Bulls Keep Bittensor’s Momentum Alive?

TAO’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line has crossed below the zero line, but the signal line stays above it, and gives mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive. This setup can hint at a possible reversal attempt.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator stationed at -0.09 shows mild selling pressure in the Bittensor market. The capital is flowing out of the asset, and the sellers have a small edge. There will be sideways movements, unless the selling pressure starts to build further.

The Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure. Moreover, the sellers are clearly in control, pushing the price below its average level. This reflects solid downward momentum, and it may trend lower unless the buyers step in to slow down.

Besides, TAO’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI), at 37.40, indicates the market is leaning bearish. The price has been under selling pressure, but it is not deeply oversold yet. If the value moves closer to 30, the market may get oversold, where a short bounce might happen.

Top Updated Crypto News

Momentum Shift for FARTCOIN: Will It Stay Range-Bound?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the current trading range of Bittensor (TAO) and how much value did it lose in the last 24 hours?

ABittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the potential downside support level for Bittensor if the bearish momentum continues?

AIf the bearish momentum continues, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range, and a continuous loss could push the price below $232.19.

QWhat does the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator suggest about TAO's trend?

ATAO's MACD line has crossed below the zero line, while the signal line stays above it, giving mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive, hinting at a possible reversal attempt.

QAccording to the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator, what is the current pressure in the Bittensor market?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is stationed at -0.09, showing mild selling pressure and indicating that capital is flowing out of the asset, with sellers having a small edge.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 imply for TAO?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure, indicating that sellers are in control and pushing the price below its average level, reflecting solid downward momentum.

Пов'язані матеріали

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit28 хв тому

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit28 хв тому

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit42 хв тому

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit42 хв тому

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 год тому

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 год тому

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 год тому

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 год тому

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 год тому

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот