Binance suspends employee over using insider information for personal gain

cointelegraphОпубліковано о 2025-12-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-08

Анотація

Binance suspended an employee suspected of using insider information for personal gain after an internal investigation launched on Dec. 7. The employee allegedly posted from Binance Futures' official X account less than a minute after a token was issued onchain, using non-public information. The exchange immediately suspended the individual and contacted local authorities for potential legal action. Binance is splitting a $100,000 reward among early whistleblowers who reported the incident via its official channel. The exchange reiterated its zero-tolerance policy toward insider abuse and pledged stronger internal controls. This follows a similar incident in March involving another employee accused of front-running trades.

Binance said Monday it launched an internal investigation on Dec. 7 into an employee it suspected of abusing access to insider information by posting from an official Binance Futures social media account for personal gain.

The exchange said in an X post that its audit team received a report alleging the employee used non‐public information to craft a post on the official Binance Futures X account “less than a minute” after the token was issued onchain.

The employee in question was immediately suspended, and Binance said it has contacted authorities in the jurisdiction where the employee is based to pursue potential legal action.

Cointelegraph reached out to Binance to request further details on the cryptocurrency in question and the profit made, but had not received a reply by publication.

Binance leans on whistleblowers

The exchange is leaning into whistleblowing as a governance tool, confirming that its promised $100,000 reward will be split among several users who submitted the earliest valid reports through its official audit@binance.com channel after those tips were verified and deduplicated.

Binance stressed that only reports sent via this internal channel qualify for bounties, even though some information about the incident also surfaced publicly on X, and urged the community to continue flagging suspicious activity.

Related: DATs bring crypto’s insider trading problem to TradFi: Shane Molidor

The exchange reiterated its “zero tolerance” stance on employees using their positions for personal gain, pledging tougher internal controls and process improvements to “close off all possible spaces for abuse” and prevent similar misconduct in the future, using the incident as a chance to show it will suspend employees, cooperate with regulators, and pay informants rather than quietly handle such cases in‐house.

The case demonstrates how quickly whistleblowers can identify suspicious patterns in onchain activity and social posts, and how exchanges can utilize this information through structured bounty programs.

Related: How mass decoy messaging protects whistleblowers — CoverDrop inventor

Deja vu for the Binance team

This is not the first time a Binance employee has been accused of abusing their position. In March, Binance Wallet said it suspended a staff member and opened an investigation after whistleblowers alleged the employee used insider information about an upcoming token generation event to front‐run trades.

The employee bought a large amount of the token via multiple linked wallets before the public announcement and then sold part of the position for significant profits once the launch went live.

Binance is not the only exchange to face insider-trading allegations tied to staff access and market‐moving information. In 2022, US authorities charged a former Coinbase product manager and two associates, accusing them of using confidential knowledge of upcoming token listings on the exchange to trade at least 25 assets ahead of public announcements and generate more than $1 million in illicit profit.

Magazine: Bitcoin OG Kyle Chassé is one strike away from a YouTube permaban

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Пов'язані матеріали

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

Institutional Bitcoin reserves held by publicly traded companies are overwhelmingly concentrated in the US, according to data from Unfolded. US-based firms hold 1.24 million BTC, accounting for a staggering 92.7% of the global total held by such entities. Over the past 12 months, these companies added 510,000 BTC to their portfolios, a purchasing rate that vastly outpaced new supply. Their acquisitions were more than triple the number of new BTC mined during the same period, significantly impacting the asset's supply dynamics. This trend, heavily influenced by firms like MicroStrategy, reflects a growing institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset across sectors like energy, technology, and finance. Analysts warn this sustained institutional demand, especially after the upcoming halving which will reduce new supply, could further strain the supply-demand balance and influence long-term price trends.

cryptonews.ru4 хв тому

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

cryptonews.ru4 хв тому

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ru5 хв тому

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ru5 хв тому

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

Reddit reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $253 million, roughly triple the $89 million from a year earlier. Revenue surged 61% year-over-year to $805 million, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of over 60% growth. Advertising revenue jumped 64% to $762 million, driven by higher ad prices and increased impressions. The company's weekly active unique users surpassed 500 million for the first time, reaching 514.6 million. However, executives flagged a concern: traffic from search engines became volatile toward the end of the quarter, creating headwinds for converting its large audience into daily users. CEO Steven Huffman noted that "AI overviews have not yet had a similarly positive impact" on search referrals compared to traditional links. Other highlights include adjusted EBITDA rising 43% to $343 million, operating cash flow of $262 million for the quarter, and the launch of Reddit's first shareholder return program with $235 million spent on share repurchases. For the current quarter, Reddit forecasts revenue between $860 million and $870 million.

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

cryptonews.ru7 хв тому

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbit11 хв тому

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbit11 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit21 хв тому

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?