Base Shifts From OP Stack to Unified Stack for Next Phase of Upgrades

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-02-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-19

Анотація

Base, a Coinbase-incubated Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, is transitioning from the OP Stack to its own unified software stack called "base/base" to accelerate upgrades and enhance security. While moving away from the OP Stack, Base will continue to receive support from the Optimism Foundation and remain compatible with OP Stack specifications. The new stack, built on open-source components like Reth, simplifies the architecture, making the network easier to update while maintaining safety and decentralization. Base remains a Stage 1 decentralized rollup and is strengthening security with an independent signer, faster withdrawals, improved governance, and stronger protections. The roadmap includes multiple hard forks: Base V1 will implement Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrades and transition to TEE/ZK proofs, while future forks (V2 and V3) aim to improve user interactions and add Ethereum’s Glamsterdam support. Node operators are advised to switch to the new base client for compatibility with upcoming upgrades.

Base, a Coinbase-incubated Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, was launched as an OP Stack chain, then incorporated a diverse range of software in collaboration with various partners, including Optimism, Flashbots, and Paradigm.

According to the Base announcement, they introduced a single unified stack called base/base for accelerating upgrades and additional security, and it is made public and opened for contribution. While moving away from the OP Stack, it will still receive mission-critical support from the Optimism Foundation.

Simplifying the Stack to Accelerate Upgrades

According to the Base engineering blog, “Our unified solution, base/base, built on open-sourced components such as Reth, allows us to dramatically simplify the number of components, by optimizing them directly for our use case.” This will make the network easier to update and allow the developers to focus on what Base specifically needs, as it is open and public.

As Base is upgrading how it works to become more independent and efficient. Importantly, nothing changes in terms of safety. Base remains a Stage 1 decentralized rollup, and the team is also strengthening security by adding an independent signer and speeding up plans for faster withdrawals, improved governance, and stronger protections to keep the network open, neutral, and secure for everyone.

Base’s Long-Term Roadmap

As of now, Base blog noted, “Base will continue operating as it does today, and we will remain compatible with the OP Stack specification.”

The upcoming hard fork (Base V1) is going to implement Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrades and transition from Optimistic proofs to TEE/ZK proofs for a faster network. Further, two more hard forks are discussed, such as the Base V2 hard fork, which is planned to introduce smoother user interactions. Then, Base V3 hard fork is planned to add Ethereum’s Glamsterdam Support.

As the shift marks a broader architectural consolidation across Base’s evolution, from its initial OP Stack foundations to a unified stack fully maintained within Base, the Base network asks node operators to use the new base for client updates instead of Optimism’s to remain compatible with upcoming future hard forks.

Highlighted Crypto News:

CoinFello Unveils AI Smart Contract Agent at ETHDenver with BuffiBot Preview

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main change Base is making to its technological stack according to the article?

ABase is shifting from the OP Stack to a new, unified stack called base/base to accelerate upgrades and enhance security.

QDespite moving away from the OP Stack, what ongoing support will Base receive?

ABase will still receive mission-critical support from the Optimism Foundation.

QWhat is the primary goal of Base's new unified stack, base/base?

AThe goal is to dramatically simplify the number of components, making the network easier to update and allowing developers to focus on Base's specific needs.

QWhat key security feature is the team adding as part of its upgrades?

AThe team is strengthening security by adding an independent signer.

QWhat is the planned change for the Base V1 hard fork regarding proofs?

AThe Base V1 hard fork will transition from Optimistic proofs to TEE/ZK proofs for a faster network.

Пов'язані матеріали

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has announced that a native, non-custodial wallet called Gram wallet will be built into every Telegram app this summer. This move aims to provide instant, fee-free cryptocurrency transfers for the platform's over 1 billion monthly active users. Durov described it as the largest deployment of a non-custodial crypto wallet in history. The new wallet, developed by Telegram itself, differs fundamentally from the existing third-party @wallet bot. It will be non-custodial from the start, meaning users will control their private keys. Following the announcement, the GRAM token (formerly Toncoin) saw a price increase of approximately 8%. This initiative is part of Telegram's renewed control over the TON blockchain and its "Make TON Great Again" roadmap, marking a return to the project after a 2018 SEC lawsuit. The launch comes as other super-apps like X Money and Meta are also expanding into digital payments, with Telegram opting for a crypto-native approach. However, key details remain unclear, including the exact launch date beyond "this summer," how the promised zero fees will be implemented technically, and how asset support and private key management will work for mainstream users.

marsbit20 хв тому

Send a Message to Transfer Coins? Telegram to 'Stuff' a Crypto Wallet into 1 Billion Users This Summer

marsbit20 хв тому

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

Hyperliquid has proposed the HIP-4 upgrade to expand from perpetual futures into a broader, permissionless infrastructure layer for on-chain applications, requiring deployers to stake 500,000 HYPE to launch new markets. This shift aims to enable developers to build on its platform, a strategy backed by growing long-term investor conviction. Evidence includes a major trader staking millions in HYPE instead of taking profits, with total staked tokens reaching 43.9% of the supply, reducing available tokens and strengthening network security. Market metrics like high open interest and balanced funding rates suggest measured, non-speculative trader positioning. Sustained growth in protocol revenue, TVL, and governance participation further supports the positive outlook, contingent on continued user adoption and successful upgrade execution.

ambcrypto23 хв тому

Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 proposal fuels HYPE staking as long-term conviction grows

ambcrypto23 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报36 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报36 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News54 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News54 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?