Axie Infinity erases September losses – But AXS price faces THIS threat

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-22Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-22

Анотація

The gaming token sector, including Axie Infinity (AXS), posted strong gains despite broader crypto market pressure, with AXS erasing losses since mid-September. However, the rally shows signs of exhaustion. The RSI indicates overbought conditions, suggesting a potential near-term pullback. Spot market activity reveals a shift, with $91,000 in outflows and a 21% drop in trading volume, signaling weakening momentum. While derivatives data shows lingering bullish sentiment in futures, the negative funding rate points to growing short positions. If spot demand softens further alongside negative funding, AXS could face increased risk of a deeper correction.

While the broader crypto market remained under pressure, gaming tokens stayed relatively insulated and posted strong gains.

The sector recorded a monthly weighted average increase of roughly 40%, with AXS among the top performers.

Axie Infinity’s [AXS] recent rally erased losses accumulated since the 12th of September 2025, pushing many holders back to break-even. However, momentum indicators suggested the advance may be nearing exhaustion, raising pullback risk.

Investor positioning raises caution

Investor positioning in AXS grew increasingly aggressive during the rally. That shift raised questions about the uptrend’s durability.

At press time, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) moved back above 70, placing AXS in overbought territory. Such conditions historically preceded short-term price tops rather than sustained breakouts.

The TradingView chart showed RSI remained elevated as price accelerated. That divergence increased the probability of near-term mean reversion.

That said, downside risk appeared contained for now. The Accumulation/Distribution indicator dipped modestly but stayed firmly positive.

This suggested selling pressure increased, yet broader market structure remained supportive. Any pullback would likely remain corrective unless accumulation weakened further.

Spot investors pull back

Spot market activity offered one of the clearest signals of shifting sentiment, with capital beginning to exit the market.

Exchange Netflows showed Spot traders sold roughly $91,000 worth of AXS over the past 24 hours.

That marked a clear shift from the steady buying observed during the recent advance. Spot participants often provide structural support, making their retreat notable.

On top of that, trading activity slowed sharply. CoinGlass data showed volume fell 21% to about $2 billion, a decline exceeding $400 million.

When price advances on falling volume, it often signals weakening momentum. Historically, such conditions have preceded either consolidation or corrective price moves.

Derivatives market signals divergence

Derivatives data presented a mixed picture. The Taker Buy/Sell Ratio showed that bullish sentiment still dominated in the perpetual Futures market, with taker buy orders outweighing sell orders.

However, funding data told a different story. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate turned decisively negative, signaling that short positions outweighed longs.

CoinGlass data showed the metric printed -0.1286% at press time. That meant bearish traders paid funding to maintain exposure.

If negative funding persisted alongside softening spot demand, downside pressure could build. That alignment would increase the risk of a deeper corrective phase for AXS.


Final Thoughts

  • Axie Infinity (AXS) erased post-September losses as gaming tokens outperformed, lifting the price back toward key resistance.
  • Overbought RSI, weakening spot demand, and negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate suggest momentum may fade near-term.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the performance of gaming tokens like Axie Infinity (AXS) compared to the broader crypto market recently?

AGaming tokens remained relatively insulated from the broader crypto market's pressure and posted strong gains, with the sector recording a monthly weighted average increase of roughly 40%.

QWhat key technical indicator suggests that AXS might be in overbought territory and facing a potential pullback?

AThe Relative Strength Index (RSI) moved back above 70, placing AXS in overbought territory, which historically has preceded short-term price tops.

QWhat shift in spot market activity signals a change in sentiment for AXS?

AExchange Netflows showed that spot traders sold approximately $91,000 worth of AXS over the past 24 hours, marking a clear shift from the steady buying observed during the recent advance.

QWhat does a negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate indicate for the AXS derivatives market?

AA negative OI-Weighted Funding Rate, which was -0.1286% at press time, signals that short positions outweigh longs, meaning bearish traders are paying funding to maintain their exposure.

QWhat are the main factors mentioned that could lead to a deeper corrective phase for AXS?

AThe alignment of persistent negative funding rates alongside softening spot demand could build downside pressure and increase the risk of a deeper corrective phase for AXS.

Пов'язані матеріали

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit50 хв тому

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit50 хв тому

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit1 год тому

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit1 год тому

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit1 год тому

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片