Average Crypto Trader Losses Reached $500 Million Per Day in 2025

RBK-cryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-25Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-25

Анотація

According to a Coinglass report, the total volume of forced liquidations of margin-based trading positions on crypto exchanges neared $150 billion in 2025. The estimated average daily liquidation volume throughout the year ranged from $400 million to $500 million. A record-breaking single-day liquidation event occurred on October 11, accounting for nearly 15% of the annual total with nearly $20 billion in futures positions liquidated. This was triggered by US President Donald Trump's announcement of new 100% tariffs on Chinese imports and export controls on critical software, which sparked fears of a new trade war and caused a sharp shift towards risk-off sentiment. Bitcoin and Ethereum fell by 10-15% at their peak, while many altcoins crashed by 80% or more. The crash exposed key market vulnerabilities, including reliance on opaque liquidation mechanisms, fragile infrastructure under peak load, and a lack of effective circuit breakers common on traditional exchanges. Unlike the Terra (LUNA) collapse in 2022, this event did not lead to a cascade of institutional investor defaults, as the risks were concentrated in specific strategies and assets rather than being systemic.

In 2025, the total volume of forced liquidations of margin-based trading positions on cryptocurrency exchanges approached $150 billion, according to a Coinglass report. The estimated average daily liquidation rate throughout the year ranged from $400 million to $500 million.

This refers to the nominal value of positions including leverage (a $100 position with 10x leverage counts as $1000 in the total loss amount), but even with this adjustment, the scale of the losses remains impressive.

Nearly 15% of the annual liquidation volume occurred in a single day—on the night of October 11th, when the crypto market experienced the largest cascade of futures position liquidations in history, with a total volume of nearly $20 billion. This set an absolute record for the volume of forcibly closed trading positions on cryptocurrency exchanges.

The event occurred against the backdrop of U.S. President Donald Trump announcing new 100% tariffs on imports from China, as well as export controls on critical software. This sharply increased expectations of a new trade war, as Coinglass writes, which forced markets into a "risk-off" mode, meaning a retreat from high-risk assets, including Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Experts note that the scale of the consequences was determined not only by external factors but also by the structure of the leverage used and the functioning of liquidation mechanisms. During exchange overload, Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanisms were triggered, and trades were executed at unfavorable prices, causing losses even for profitable traders.

Bitcoin and Ethereum lost 10–15% at their peak, while many altcoins collapsed by 80% or more.

The Coinglass report stated that the crash of that day revealed key market vulnerabilities: reliance on opaque liquidation mechanisms, the fragility of infrastructure under peak loads, and the lack of effective circuit breakers that exist on traditional exchanges.

Unlike the crash of the Terra (LUNA) project in 2022, this collapse did not lead to a series of defaults by institutional investors. The risks were not systemic and were concentrated in specific strategies and assets, noted Coinglass.

How the Base Blockchain Ecosystem is Structured. Top 5 Applications

AI Outperformed Humans in a Crypto Trading Tournament. What Were the Results

Miner "Capitulation" Called a Bullish Factor for Bitcoin. Why

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the average daily liquidation amount for crypto traders in 2025 according to the Coinglass report?

AThe average daily liquidation amount ranged from $400 million to $500 million in 2025.

QWhat event on October 11 triggered the largest cascade of futures liquidations in crypto market history?

AUS President Donald Trump announced new 100% tariffs on imports from China and export controls on critical software, which sharply increased expectations of a new trade war.

QWhat were the maximum losses for Bitcoin and Ethereum during the market crash described in the article?

ABitcoin and Ethereum lost 10-15% at their maximum, while many altcoins collapsed by 80% or more.

QWhat key market vulnerabilities were exposed by the crash according to the Coinglass report?

AThe key vulnerabilities were dependence on opaque liquidation mechanisms, infrastructure fragility during peak loads, and the lack of effective circuit breakers that exist on traditional exchanges.

QHow did this market crash differ from the Terra (LUNA) collapse in 2022 in terms of institutional impact?

AUnlike the Terra collapse, this crash did not lead to a series of defaults by institutional investors. The risks were not systemic and were concentrated in specific strategies and assets.

Пов'язані матеріали

Top Crypto Coins With Real Use Cases To Watch in June 2026: NEAR, HYPE, Humanity Protocol, and BlockDAG Compared

June 2026 sees several noteworthy crypto projects emerging. Hyperliquid is a DeFi derivatives trading giant with strong liquidity. NEAR Protocol combines scalable blockchain infrastructure with AI integration for next-gen dApps. Humanity Protocol tackles AI-age identity verification using biometric proofs. BlockDAG stands out with concrete ecosystem metrics. Its ongoing Legacy Sale offers BDAG coins at $0.00000044, contrasting with a $0.05 Buyback Program rate, creating a clear arbitrage opportunity. The network boasts over 10,000 TPS, more than $1B in on-chain transfers, and over 8B coins staked. Its live casino features 100+ games, and over 1B coins have been repurchased, reducing supply. BDAG is already listed on 13 exchanges like BitMart and LBank, with Tier-1 listings pending.

TheNewsCrypto42 хв тому

Top Crypto Coins With Real Use Cases To Watch in June 2026: NEAR, HYPE, Humanity Protocol, and BlockDAG Compared

TheNewsCrypto42 хв тому

Ethereum's Last Major Buyer: How Much Longer Can It Hold On?

The article examines the precarious situation of Bitmine, a major and aggressive institutional buyer of Ethereum (ETH), which is nearing its goal of accumulating 5% of the total ETH supply. Despite holding significant unrealized losses exceeding $10.5 billion due to a high average purchase price, Bitmine continues to buy ETH, recently financing its purchases through a $274 million perpetual preferred stock offering with a 9.5% annual dividend. The analysis highlights several critical pressures on this model. Bitmine relies heavily on ETH staking yields (3-4%) to potentially cover its high dividend obligations. However, if ETH's price remains low or falls further, these yields, paid in ETH, lose dollar value, creating a sustainability gap. The article questions what will support ETH's price once Bitmine completes its 5% target and potentially slows or stops its purchases, as other institutional buyers like ETFs have shown net outflows. The conclusion outlines three scenarios: a pessimistic view where financing dries up and ETH could fall sharply; a base case of continued buying and range-bound prices; and an optimistic outlook driven by new institutional demand and favorable regulation. Ultimately, the piece questions who will become the next major marginal buyer to support ETH's price if Bitmine's "flywheel" of buying slows down.

marsbit3 год тому

Ethereum's Last Major Buyer: How Much Longer Can It Hold On?

marsbit3 год тому

Record Institutional Bitcoin Selling Now Exceeds Miner Output By 460%

Institutional selling of Bitcoin has reached a historic high, with net selling by entities like spot ETFs and digital asset treasury companies now equivalent to 464% of the daily mining output, according to analysis by Capriole Investments. This marks a sharp reversal from the accumulation seen during April and May's rally. The record negative "Net Institutional Buying" metric is primarily driven by ETF outflows, while corporate holders continue net buying. Amid this institutional distribution, Bitcoin's price recently dipped below $61,000 before recovering to around $62,300, showing signs of consolidation.

bitcoinist3 год тому

Record Institutional Bitcoin Selling Now Exceeds Miner Output By 460%

bitcoinist3 год тому

How Much Longer Can Ethereum's Last Major Buyer Hold On?

"The article analyzes the precarious position of Bitmine, currently the largest and most aggressive marginal buyer of Ethereum (ETH). Despite holding a massive position of approximately 5.66 million ETH (nearing its 5% supply target) and generating staking income, the company faces over $10 billion in unrealized losses due to a high average purchase price. With ETH prices depressed, its equity has plummeted nearly 90%. To sustain its buying spree, Bitmine recently issued $274 million in perpetual preferred shares with a 9.5% annual dividend. The core dilemma is whether staking yields (3-4%) can long-term support these high dividend obligations without significant ETH price appreciation. The article warns that once Bitmine achieves its 5% goal and potentially stops buying, the ETH market risks losing its key support pillar. Other institutional buyers, like ETH ETFs, have shown net outflows, while potential new demand from stablecoin legislation or RWA tokenization remains slow to materialize. The conclusion questions who will provide the next wave of sustained buying pressure to support ETH's price, highlighting a critical uncertainty for the asset's near-term trajectory."

链捕手3 год тому

How Much Longer Can Ethereum's Last Major Buyer Hold On?

链捕手3 год тому

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit4 год тому

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit4 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси