‘Attempts to hijack the CLARITY Act are shameful’: Trump advisor slams banks

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-11

Анотація

White House advisor Patrick Witt criticizes the banking lobby for opposing the pro-innovation CLARITY Act, calling attempts to turn it into an anti-competition bill "shameful." The dispute centers on stablecoin rewards, which banks argue create an uneven playing field and risk deposit flight, potentially reducing bank lending. Stablecoin issuers view restrictions as a threat to their business model and cite competition with China's digital yuan. Lawmakers propose limiting types of stablecoin reward activities as a compromise, but the bill's future remains uncertain without resolution.

The White House continues to express disappointment with the banking lobby’s hardline against the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

The two industries, the crypto and banking sectors, have failed to reach an amicable agreement on stablecoin rewards. The stablecoin rewards issue has stalled the bill’s progress since early this year.

At a recent bankers’ summit in Washington, the industry maintained a hardline stance against any compromise on the bill, prompting criticism from the White House.

In response, Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, said,

“The CLARITY Act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation. Attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn it into an anti-competition bill are shameful.”

Bankers’ plea

Witt’s statement followed Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association, an advocacy group, who framed the current dispute as ‘anti-competitive.’

During the Washington summit, Nichols cautioned,

“Our industry welcomes competition and innovation...what we don’t support is an uneven playing field.”

Since last year, the traditional banking sector has maintained that stablecoin rewards will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system.

The industry argues that the U.S. stablecoin law, the GENIUS Act, created a loophole that allows intermediaries to share yield with users, thereby bypassing the direct reward ban imposed on issuers.

To mitigate this, banks want the ban extended to intermediaries as well. This would mean amending the GENIUS Act or imposing the ban in the CLARITY Act.

However, stablecoin issuers view this as a threat to their business model. In fact, beyond disrupting their model, supporters view stablecoin yield as a national security issue, citing China’s push in the sector with rewards for digital yuan.

Proposed CLARITY Act compromise

Senators have tried to bring the two sides into a compromise on the issue.

During the banks’ summit, Democrat Senator for Maryland, Angela Alsobrooks, stressed that each faction will be ‘just a little bit unhappy’ but will help push for clear rules for the sector.

“We absolutely have to have these protections to prevent the deposit flight, but we’re going to probably have to make some compromises.”

Congressional Research Service (CRS) estimates that the stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion, because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves. The CRS urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

The compromise lawmakers have been pushing for is to narrow the types of stablecoin activity crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards.

However, the banks’ opposition has faced a series of criticisms from the White House for the past few days. As such, the path forward for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain unless the concerned stakeholders resolve the stablecoin yield issue.


Final Summary

  • White House slammed banks for framing the CLARITY Act as an ‘anti-competition’ bill.
  • The banking industry reiterated its concerns about stablecoin yields during a recent meeting.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main criticism expressed by Trump's crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt criticized attempts to hijack the legislative process and turn the CLARITY Act into an anti-competition bill, stating that such attempts are shameful and that the act must remain a pro-innovation piece of legislation.

QWhy does the banking industry oppose stablecoin rewards according to the article?

AThe banking industry opposes stablecoin rewards because they believe it will lead to deposit flight and harm the financial system, arguing that the GENIUS Act created a loophole allowing intermediaries to share yield with users, bypassing the direct reward ban on issuers.

QWhat compromise have lawmakers proposed regarding stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act?

ALawmakers have proposed narrowing the types of stablecoin activity that crypto platforms can allow to receive stablecoin rewards as a compromise to address concerns from both the banking and crypto sectors.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association president, Rob Nichols, say about competition during the Washington summit?

ARob Nichols stated that the banking industry welcomes competition and innovation but does not support an uneven playing field, framing the current dispute over the CLARITY Act as 'anti-competitive'.

QAccording to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), what impact could stablecoin yield have on bank lending?

AThe Congressional Research Service estimates that stablecoin yield could reduce bank lending by $65 billion to $1.26 trillion because the GENIUS Act prohibits lending of stablecoin reserves, and they urged banks to offer higher interest rates to depositors to remain competitive.

Пов'язані матеріали

TechFlow Intelligence: Trump-Linked Companies Transfer $12 Million in Assets Before China Visit, 'The Big Short' Protagonist Warns of Stock Market Bubble Again

The article reports multiple developments across tech, crypto, and finance. In AI, Mozilla used AI for large-scale code review, Google confirmed hackers used AI to find zero-day exploits, and OpenAI deployed GPT-5.5 to find errors in math benchmarks. A court ruled Anthropic's scanning and destroying books for AI training as fair use, while its Claude platform launched on AWS. Google's new video model 'Omni' was leaked. In crypto/Web3, Trump-linked companies transferred $12M in crypto assets before a China visit. BlackRock chose Ethereum for tokenized funds, and a hacker stole $174k via a malicious NFT that tricked an AI. Jack Dorsey's first tweet NFT plummeted from $2.9M to under $5. In chips/hardware, TSMC approved an additional $20B for its Arizona plant. Apple's Tim Cook and Elon Musk will accompany Trump to China, while Nvidia's Jensen Huang is notably absent. For markets, Michael Burry warned of parabolic stock rises and suggested near-total sell-offs, with online discussions comparing current sentiment to the 1999 bubble. Other notes include WTI oil surpassing $100, a 20% price hike for Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail, and new products like Unitree's $26.9k humanoid robot. The underlying theme suggests AI is becoming infrastructure, creating pressure on old systems while a new order is not yet ready, leaving investors anxious.

marsbit28 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence: Trump-Linked Companies Transfer $12 Million in Assets Before China Visit, 'The Big Short' Protagonist Warns of Stock Market Bubble Again

marsbit28 хв тому

2026 New Policy Interpretation: The "Mutual Pursuit" of Intelligent Agents and AI Terminals, and the Three Major Value Reconstructions in the AIoT Industry

In May 2026, China's national ministries released two pivotal policy documents that jointly establish a strategic "dual-track" framework for the AIoT industry. The "Intelligent Agent Standardized Application and Innovation Development Implementation Opinions" defines the "soul"—positioning intelligent agents as core AI products. The "Artificial Intelligence Terminal Intelligence Grading" national standard defines the "body"—establishing a four-tier capability ladder (L1 to L4) for AI hardware. This synchronized policy approach is globally unique, moving beyond market-led (US) or risk-focused (EU) models. It frames AIoT as a new type of "intelligent infrastructure," comparable to electricity or the internet in historical significance. The core analysis identifies a value evolution from IoT 1.0 (connection) to AIoT 4.0 (collaboration, represented by the forward-looking L4 level). This "L4" signifies a paradigm shift: from users operating tools to delegating tasks to agent-like devices ("Intelligent Action of All Things"). The article outlines three strategic paths for companies: becoming Standard Definers, Scenario Integrators (focusing on 19 specified application areas), or Infrastructure Builders. A critical 18-24 month window is identified for strategic positioning. A "Four Levers" strategy is proposed: leveraging Standards (L-level certification), leveraging Scenarios (deep vertical focus), leveraging Open Source (for cost reduction and ecosystem influence), and leveraging Momentum (engaging in global protocol ecosystems). In conclusion, these policies are a starting gun for a decade-long industrial transformation, shifting the industry narrative from "Intelligent Connection of All Things" to "Intelligent Action of All Things," with companies needing to choose their赛道and execution strategy decisively.

marsbit1 год тому

2026 New Policy Interpretation: The "Mutual Pursuit" of Intelligent Agents and AI Terminals, and the Three Major Value Reconstructions in the AIoT Industry

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片