ASIC Fintech Chief Says Crypto Shouldn’t Be a Separate Asset Class

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-11

Анотація

The fintech chief of Australia's securities regulator, ASIC, argues that crypto should not be treated as a separate asset class. Rhys Bollen stated at the Melbourne Money and Finance Conference that blockchain and crypto perform the same core financial functions as existing infrastructure and should be regulated based on economic substance rather than technological form. He proposed that tokenized securities fall under securities laws, stablecoins under payment services legislation, and other crypto aspects under consumer protection laws. Bollen emphasized that regulatory systems have historically adapted to technological changes without abandoning core principles like market integrity and consumer protection. He noted that most consumer harm in crypto stems from intermediaries (platforms offering trading, custody, or lending services), not the tokens themselves. ASIC's approach focuses on regulating these intermediaries rather than the assets. This stance contrasts with dedicated crypto regulatory frameworks in the US and EU. Bollen also cautioned that legal analysis should prioritize practical control and profit over claims of decentralization.

The fintech chief of Australia’s security regulator states that blockchain and crypto are the technologies doing the same functions as current financial infrastructure, so they should not be considered as different asset classes when making legislation.

On March 11, a paper was presented at the Melbourne Money and Finance Conference in which Rhys Bollen, the head of fintech at the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, mentioned that crypto should be regulated on economic substance instead of the technological form.

Tokenized securities should come under securities laws, and stablecoins should initiate payment services legislation. He also mentioned that other bodies of crypto may fall under consumer protection laws.

What Did Bollen Further State?

The approach of Bollen differs from the crypto-aimed regulatory frameworks in different countries, such as the CLARITY Act in the US and the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation framework in Europe.

Bollen went on, mentioning that three prominent financial functions, including capital allocation, payments and risk management, have developed with technological advancements and that distributed ledger technologies like blockchain should not be treated differently.

The head of fintech also added that regulatory systems have so far adapted to technological change, from paper instruments to electronic records, without leaving foundational principles like consumer protection, market integrity and systematic stability.

The Australian crypto market has also been guided via ASIC Information Sheet 225, which mentions that current definitions of “financial product” and “financial service” under the Corporations Act can concern digital assets.

ASIC Information Sheet 225 is also aimed at the regulation of intermediaries instead of tokens, with Bollen mentioning that a lot of consumer harm in the digital asset industry has originated from the conduct of crypto platforms providing custody, trading, lending or yield services.

Bollen confirmed that diversification issues may originate with decentralised products or services; also, he mentioned that legal analysis should aim at practical control and profit instead of formal claims of decentralisation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto Prices Remain Flat While Asia Secures Natural Gas Supplies

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to ASIC's fintech chief, why shouldn't crypto be considered a separate asset class?

ABecause blockchain and crypto are technologies performing the same functions as current financial infrastructure, so they should be regulated based on economic substance rather than technological form.

QWhat specific regulatory approach did Rhys Bollen propose for different types of crypto assets?

AHe proposed that tokenized securities should come under securities laws, stablecoins should initiate payment services legislation, and other crypto assets may fall under consumer protection laws.

QHow does Bollen's regulatory approach differ from frameworks in the US and Europe?

ABollen's approach focuses on regulating crypto based on its economic function, unlike the US CLARITY Act and Europe's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation which are specifically crypto-aimed frameworks.

QWhat are the three prominent financial functions that Bollen mentioned have evolved with technology?

AThe three functions are capital allocation, payments, and risk management.

QAccording to ASIC Information Sheet 225, what is the primary focus of crypto regulation in Australia?

AIt focuses on regulating intermediaries (such as crypto platforms providing custody, trading, lending, or yield services) rather than the tokens themselves.

Пов'язані матеріали

OpenAI Launches Workflow Agent, GPTs Begin Countdown

OpenAI has launched Workspace Agents, an evolution of GPTs designed for teams. This new feature allows users to create reusable, shareable agents that automate repetitive workflows. Driven by Codex, these agents operate within their own workspace, can access files, call tools, and run continuously in the background. Users describe a workflow—such as collecting information, making judgments, generating results, and sending outputs—to ChatGPT, which then builds the agent. The entire team can use and refine the agent via ChatGPT or Slack. Once set up, the agent runs autonomously. Workspace Agents are team-shared, code-free, and manageable with predefined permissions and controls. They are suitable for structured, repeatable tasks involving multiple tools and continuous operation, such as software review, feedback整理, report generation, sales follow-up, and risk assessment. The system operates within clear rules, with sensitive actions requiring human confirmation. It aims to transform workflows from being person-dependent to being documented, executable, and reusable—akin to scientific management principles. Competing solutions from Microsoft and Google are also emerging in this space.

marsbit5 хв тому

OpenAI Launches Workflow Agent, GPTs Begin Countdown

marsbit5 хв тому

The Richest Fed Chair in History? Three Challenges Kevin Warsh Is About to Face

Kevin Warsh, nominated by Trump as the next Federal Reserve Chair, faces three major challenges as he prepares to take office. With a personal investment portfolio exceeding $130 million, including holdings in crypto protocols and public chains, he is set to become the wealthiest Fed chair in history. Warsh, known for his historically hawkish stance, has recently shifted his position, arguing that AI is a powerful deflationary force that could boost productivity. However, rising CPI and energy prices pose a risk to this outlook. He strongly defended Fed independence, stating that it is eroded not by political pressure but by the institution’s own missteps, such as blurring the lines between monetary and fiscal policy during the 2021-2022 inflation period. Additionally, Warsh advocates for significant balance sheet reduction while potentially cutting rates—a combination that markets find unsettling. He also proposes modernizing inflation measurement with real-time data, including stablecoins and on-chain pricing, to improve policy responsiveness. His confirmation is currently delayed due to a political investigation into current Chair Powell, adding uncertainty to his appointment.

marsbit18 хв тому

The Richest Fed Chair in History? Three Challenges Kevin Warsh Is About to Face

marsbit18 хв тому

Rivaling a Documentary, OpenAI President Recounts the 72-Hour Internal Strife

OpenAI President Greg Brockman details the 72-hour internal crisis following CEO Sam Altman's sudden firing by the board. Both were blindsided by the decision, leading Brockman to resign immediately in solidarity. They began planning a new company at Altman’s home, aiming to take all OpenAI employees with them. Despite intense recruitment efforts by competitors, not a single employee accepted an external offer. The situation shifted when co-founder Ilya Sutskever publicly supported the employees' petition, leading to Altman’s reinstatement. Brockman reflects on OpenAI’s origins, its shift from non-profit to capped-profit for computational scale, key breakthroughs like Dota project and GPT, and the importance of resilience and mission-focused leadership. He emphasizes AI’s potential for global benefit and the need for broad access to compute power, while acknowledging risks and the necessity of iterative deployment for safety and alignment.

marsbit26 хв тому

Rivaling a Documentary, OpenAI President Recounts the 72-Hour Internal Strife

marsbit26 хв тому

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbit28 хв тому

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbit28 хв тому

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbit1 год тому

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни T (T).