Artemis Crypto Payment Card Report: $18 Billion Market Size, The Silent Explosion of Crypto Payments

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-21

Анотація

Artemis Research reveals that the crypto payments card market has grown into a $18 billion industry, with monthly transaction volumes increasing 15-fold since early 2023. The report breaks down the crypto card stack into three layers: Networks (Visa and Mastercard), Issuers & Program Managers (e.g., Baanx, Bridge), and Consumer Apps (wallets and exchanges like MetaMask and Phantom). Visa dominates with over 90% of on-chain card transaction volume, largely due to early infrastructure partnerships. A key structural shift is the rise of full-stack issuers like Rain and Reap, which now issue cards and settle directly as Visa Principal Members—bypassing sponsor banks for greater control and better economics. Geographic usage varies: In India, crypto cards serve as collateralized credit solutions, while in Argentina, they function as inflation-hedged stablecoin debit cards. In developed markets, crypto cards target high-value users who hold significant stablecoin balances and seek to spend them. The report concludes that as stablecoin adoption grows, crypto cards will scale accordingly, acting as essential infrastructure for bringing digital dollars into the real economy.

Author: Artemis

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide:

Crypto payments are undergoing a silent "great power shift." The latest research from Artemis shows that the crypto card market has surged from the fringes in early 2023 to a massive $18 billion annualized size, with monthly transaction volume increasing 15-fold in just two years.

This article deconstructs the three layers of the crypto payment stack and reveals a surprising figure: Visa accounts for over 90% of on-chain card transaction volume. More importantly, the industry is experiencing a structural shift towards "full-stack issuance." Companies like Rain and Reap are bypassing traditional banks by connecting directly to Visa, completely rewriting the economic model. From crypto-collateralized credit in India to daily stablecoin payments in Argentina, crypto cards are becoming key infrastructure for bringing digital dollars into the real world.

Full text as follows:

Big news: We just released the industry's most detailed research report on Crypto Cards.

Not because it's a niche market, but because it has quietly grown into an $18 billion market. In early 2023, monthly transaction volume for crypto cards was only around $100 million. Today, that number has exceeded $1.5 billion.

To do this, we spent weeks digging deep into the data, the infrastructure, and the companies actually building this stack. Here are our key findings:

First, let's look at what's actually happening. Crypto cards aren't about replacing Visa or Mastercard; they're about leveraging them.

Stablecoins fund the transactions, and Cards provide the merchant acceptance environment.

The stack is divided into 3 layers:

  • Network Layer: Visa, Mastercard
  • Issuers & Program Managers Layer: Baanx, Bridge, etc.
  • Consumer Apps Layer: Wallets, Exchanges (e.g., MetaMask, Phantom)

This is precisely where the power struggle is most intense.

Although both Visa and Mastercard each have over 130 crypto partnerships...

Visa accounts for over 90% of on-chain card transaction volume. The reason lies in its early and deep partnerships with the Infrastructure Layer.

The biggest structural shift: Full-stack issuers.

Companies like Rain and Reap can now issue cards and settle directly as Visa Principal Members.

No sponsor bank needed. More control. Better economics.

Geographic distribution reveals the real use cases. India: With $338 billion in cryptocurrency inflows. The opportunity here is crypto-collateralized credit (because UPI has already won in debit payments). Argentina: The practical application is stablecoin debit cards as an inflation hedge.

In developed markets, crypto cards don't solve a "critical need."

They target a new, high-value user base: those who already hold significant stablecoin balances and want to spend them.

Our view is simple: Stablecoins will continue to grow, and crypto cards will scale accordingly.

They are the infrastructure for bringing digital dollars into the real world.

This post is just the key highlights. Read the full report for the complete deep dive.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit13 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit13 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit41 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit41 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片