Arm Steps Into Chip Manufacturing Itself | Rewire Morning News

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-25Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-25

Анотація

Arm, after 35 years of only licensing its architecture, has begun manufacturing its own data center CPU, the 136-core Neoverse V3, with Meta as its first major client. This strategic shift aims to capture a larger market share and achieve significant revenue growth. In a separate legal battle, Anthropic is challenging the Pentagon's decision to ban federal agencies from using its AI, a move the presiding judge called "disturbing." Conversely, Palantir's military AI platform received a massive $13.4 billion funding commitment from the Pentagon, highlighting a stark divergence in the U.S. government's approach to AI militarization. Four tech billionaires presented conflicting visions on AI's impact. Perplexity's CEO and Palantir's CEO suggested AI-induced job loss is beneficial, while an OpenAI investor predicted 80% of jobs could be replaced by 2030. In contrast, BlackRock's CEO warned the greater threat is AI exacerbating wealth concentration. Circle's stock plummeted 18% due to proposed legislation threatening its business model, while Tether announced its first full audit by a Big Four firm, signaling a push for legitimacy amidst tightening regulations. OpenAI shut down its Sora video app, leading Disney to withdraw a $1 billion investment. An investor filing also revealed OpenAI now lists its major shareholder, Microsoft, as a top risk factor, indicating a strategic cleanup ahead of a potential IPO. Other notable news includes SK Hynix's record $8 billion order for EU...

For the first time in 35 years, Arm is making its own chips, while four billionaires presented four different prophecies about AI and employment on the same day.

1| Arm No Longer Just Draws Blueprints; The Landlord Is Building the House Itself

Arm has always only drawn blueprints and collected licensing fees. For 35 years, companies like Qualcomm, Apple, and Nvidia have used the Arm architecture to design chips, with Arm collecting a royalty for each processor sold. This business model made Arm the safest "rent collector" in the chip industry. Now, the landlord is building the house itself.

On March 24, Arm released its first self-developed data center CPU, the 136-core Neoverse V3 architecture, with a thermal design power of 300 watts, targeting AI inference and training workloads. Meta is the first customer, with OpenAI, Cerebras, and Cloudflare also signed on. CEO Rene Haas set a clear financial goal: by 2031, this chip is expected to bring in $15 billion in annual revenue, with Arm's total revenue reaching $25 billion.

This is not a hardware "trial" by a design company. Arm's data center CPU market share has risen from about 15% in 2024 to 21% currently, with a target of reaching 50% by the end of the year. When Amazon's Graviton, Google's Axion, and Microsoft's Cobalt are all using Arm architecture to develop their own chips, Arm's choice is: rather than waiting for super customers to bypass you, become their supplier directly. For Intel and AMD, another segment of the x86 moat has been lost.

(Source: CNBC / TechCrunch / Reuters / Tom's Hardware)

2| Anthropic Takes the Pentagon to Court, While Palantir Secures $13.4 Billion on the Same Day

Anthropic refuses to relax AI safety guardrails for the military. The Pentagon's response is to list Anthropic as a "national security supply chain risk," prohibiting all federal agencies from using its technology. This is the first time in U.S. history that this procurement regulation, originally targeting foreign spies, has been used against a domestic company.

On March 24, Anthropic filed for an emergency injunction in federal court in San Francisco. Presiding Judge Rita Lin said something in court that quieted the gallery: "I'm not sure if this is murder, but it looks like an attempt to paralyze Anthropic." She described the Pentagon's actions as "disturbing," noting a lack of reasonable connection between the restrictions and the alleged national security reasons. Judge Lin is expected to rule within the next few days.

On the same day, Palantir's Maven AI platform was officially confirmed by the Pentagon as a core military system, receiving a multi-year funding commitment. The budget soared from $480 million in 2024 to $13.4 billion. Those who refused to cooperate were blacklisted; those who fully cooperated received a 28-fold budget increase. This is not just a divergence in the fate of two companies; it is an institutional split in the path of AI militarization, and the Pentagon has voted with its money.

(Source: CNBC / Al Jazeera / Axios / Tom's Hardware)

3| Four Billionaires, One Day, Four Prophecies About AI and Jobs

In a single day, four people controlling the direction of the AI industry gave four contradictory prophecies.

Perplexity CEO Srinivas said on the All-In podcast that AI-induced unemployment is a good thing: "Most people already hate their jobs." Palantir CEO Karp was more direct: in the AI era, only two types of people will survive—blue-collar workers with skills, or the neurodiverse.

OpenAI investor Khosla gave a number at a Washington forum: 80% of jobs will be replaced by AI before 2030. He predicted that "fear of AI" will be the top issue in the 2028 election.

BlackRock CEO Fink expressed a different concern in his annual letter to shareholders. The real threat of AI is not unemployment but wealth concentration. Since 1989, the median wage increase in the U.S. has lagged behind stock market returns by 15 times, with the top 1% holding 31.7% of U.S. wealth. Four narratives, one conclusion: the existing social contract is breaking down.

(Source: Fortune / BlackRock Annual Letter to Shareholders / Axios)

4| Circle Crashes 18%, Tether Hires a "Big Four" Firm; Crypto Institutionalization and Being Institutionalized Happen Simultaneously

Circle's stock price plummeted 18% in a single day. The trigger was a clause in a new draft of the Clarity Act that prohibits stablecoin issuers from distributing "economically equivalent to interest" yields to holders. This directly strikes at the core of Circle's business model. USDC's growth relies on a profit-sharing mechanism in partnership with Coinbase, and reserve interest income is key to user retention. If this path is blocked, the competitive advantage of stablecoins relative to money market funds is significantly reduced. Circle had risen 170% over the previous two months, and the vulnerability of a high pullback was exposed by this legislative draft.

On the same day, Tether announced it had hired a "Big Four" accounting firm to conduct the first comprehensive audit of USDT reserves. The specific firm was not disclosed. Tether had previously relied only on periodic attestations from BDO Italia for years, never undergoing a full audit. Also on the same day, the NYSE partnered with Securitize to develop a 24/7 tokenized securities platform. Regulation is tightening, institutions are laying pipelines—both happened on the same day.

(Source: CoinDesk / Bankless / WSJ)

5| OpenAI Shuts Down Sora, Loses Disney's $1 Billion, and Lists Microsoft as Top IPO Risk on the Same Day

OpenAI announced the shutdown of its AI video application Sora. This TikTok-style short video product, launched last October, received good technical reviews but failed to maintain user retention. The shutdown directly led Disney to withdraw a $1 billion investment plan. The original agreement was a three-year license allowing the use of over 200 characters from Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars to generate videos. OpenAI stated the team would shift to "world simulation and robotics research."

In investor documents exposed on the same day, OpenAI listed Microsoft as its top risk. Microsoft invested $13 billion for a 27% stake and is the exclusive training cloud supplier, but OpenAI has signed a $50 billion exclusivity agreement with AWS. Microsoft believes this violates exclusive terms. Shutting down loss-making products, cutting licensing burdens, and listing the largest shareholder as a risk factor—these are not isolated decisions but a systematic narrative cleanup ahead of an IPO.

(Source: TechCrunch / Variety / CNBC / 24/7 Wall St.)

Also Worth Knowing ↓

SK Hynix placed an $8 billion order with ASML for EUV lithography machines, about 30 units, setting a record for ASML's largest single order. The equipment will be delivered by the end of 2027, deployed at the new Yongin factory and the Cheongju M15X factory, serving HBM and advanced DRAM production. AI demand for memory chips is pushing equipment manufacturers' order books to the limit. (Source: Tom's Hardware / TrendForce)

Huawei released the Atlas 350 AI accelerator, with FP4 computing power of 1.56 PFLOPS, equipped with up to 112GB HBM, claiming performance is 2.8 times that of Nvidia's H20. On the same day, U.S. senators from both parties sent a joint letter to the Commerce Department, stating that Jensen Huang's claim that "chips were not transferred to China" "contradicts existing reports" and demanding a suspension of Nvidia's export licenses to China. Blockade on one side, accelerated substitution on the other. (Source: Tom's Hardware)

The President of the Philippines declared a national energy emergency for one year. The Middle East war has led to an "imminent energy supply danger," and the government has established an emergency committee to manage the distribution of fuel, food, and medicine. (Source: Fortune)

Qatar Energy declared force majeure on LNG contracts with South Korea, China, Italy, and Belgium. 17% of production capacity was destroyed by Iranian strikes, with repairs taking 3 to 5 years. The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively closed for nearly a month, blocking about one-fifth of global oil and LNG transportation. (Source: Al Jazeera)

Tenpoached several core members from ByteDance's Seed team, including visual AI platform head Xiao Xuefeng and Infra team member Zhang Chi, reporting to chief AI scientist Yao Shunyu. Since the end of 2025, Tencent has continuously absorbed large model infrastructure talent from ByteDance, with core members in the AI Infra Department and Large Language Model Department having ByteDance backgrounds. (Source: 36Kr)

Epic Games laid off over 1,000 people, with CEO Tim Sweeney stating that Fortnite engagement has been declining since last year. This is the second round of large-scale cuts after laying off 800 people in 2023, along with a $500 million reduction in contracts and marketing expenses. (Source: TechCrunch / The Verge)

Broadcom warned that TSMC's capacity has become a bottleneck for AI chip supply. AI accelerator demand continues to exceed wafer foundry capacity expansion, and supply constraints are difficult to alleviate in the short term. (Source: Reuters)

Пов'язані питання

QWhy is Arm's decision to build its own data center CPU chips a significant shift from its traditional business model?

AArm has historically only licensed its architecture to other companies, earning royalties per chip sold. By building its own data center CPU, Arm is directly entering the hardware market, aiming to capture more value and compete with major clients who are designing their own Arm-based chips, rather than risk being bypassed.

QWhat was the legal and financial outcome for Anthropic and Palantir in their dealings with the Pentagon on the same day?

AAnthropic was labeled a 'national security supply chain risk' and banned from federal use after refusing to relax AI safety measures for the military, leading to a court challenge. Conversely, Palantir's Maven AI platform was confirmed as a core military system and received a multi-year funding commitment, with its budget soaring from $480 million to $13.4 billion.

QWhat were the four contrasting predictions about AI and employment made by billionaires on the same day?

APerplexity's CEO said AI unemployment is good as many people hate their jobs; Palantir's CEO claimed only skilled blue-collar workers or neurodiverse individuals will thrive; OpenAI's investor predicted 80% of jobs will be replaced by AI by 2030; and BlackRock's CEO warned the real threat is wealth concentration, not job loss.

QWhat regulatory and institutional developments affected Circle and Tether in the crypto space on the same day?

ACircle's stock fell 18% due to a draft clause in the Clarity Act that could prohibit stablecoin issuers from distributing interest-like收益, threatening its business model. Meanwhile, Tether hired a Big Four firm for its first full audit of USDT reserves, and the NYSE partnered with Securitize to develop a 24/7 tokenized securities platform, showing regulatory tightening and institutional adoption happening simultaneously.

QWhat strategic moves did OpenAI make regarding Sora and its relationship with Microsoft, and what were the implications?

AOpenAI shut down its Sora AI video app, leading Disney to withdraw a $1 billion investment plan, and listed Microsoft as its top risk factor in investor documents due to conflicts over an exclusive cloud agreement with AWS. These actions are seen as part of a systematic narrative cleanup ahead of a potential IPO, involving discontinuing unprofitable products and addressing shareholder risks.

Пов'язані матеріали

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit3 год тому

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手3 год тому

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手3 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit5 год тому

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片