Andreessen Horowitz-Backed Entropy Announces Shutdown

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-26

Анотація

Decentralized crypto custody startup Entropy, backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is shutting down and returning remaining capital to investors, according to founder and CEO Tux Pacific. After four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, Pacific announced the decision on January 25. The company had recently shifted to a crypto automation platform but failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations. Entropy raised $25 million in a 2022 seed round led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and others. Initially offering a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks, the startup ultimately could not achieve sustainable growth. Pacific expressed gratitude to investors and indicated a personal shift away from crypto towards pharmaceuticals.

A decentralised crypto custody startup supported by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Entropy is terminating and plans to return the rest of the capital to investors, as per the founder and CEO Tux Pacific.

Pacific publicised through writing on X on January 25 that, “I am winding up Entropy, and after four years, various pivots and two rounds of layoffs, I have decided to terminate Entropy and return capital to the investors.”

The termination is followed by a late-stage push last year to reposition the firm around a crypto automation platform, which Pacific referred to as “basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto”, having automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation leveraging trusted execution environments, and deep AI amalgamations.

That product direction was still not able to clear a venture-style growth bar. After the first feedback request disclosed that the business model was not venture scale, Pacific said that he was left with the choice to navigate a creative way forward or pivot once more.

The Heartful Gratitude

Entropy first captivated attention in 2022 when it generated $25 million in a seed round headed by a16z crypto, and the participants were Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant and Inflection. Before this, the company had so far accumulated $1.95 million in a pre-seed round.

At rollout, Entropy pitched itself as a decentralised alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, depending on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to allow users to control how funds move, comprising rule-based constraints.

Pacific also showed gratitude towards a16z crypto and Guy Wuollet for aiding in steering the wind-down and called their guidance “invaluable”. Pacific has also mentioned that they plan to step back before deciding what comes after Entropy.

He added that my time in crypto might be coming to a conclusion, as I feel myself drawn mainly into pharmaceuticals, and they want to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Las Vegas Businesses Use Bitcoin as a Mainstream Payment to Avoid High Credit Card Fees

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is Entropy and why is it shutting down?

AEntropy is a decentralized crypto custody startup backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). It is shutting down because, after four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, its founder and CEO Tux Pacific decided to terminate the company as its latest product direction failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations.

QWho were the major investors in Entropy's seed funding round?

AEntropy's $25 million seed round in 2022 was led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant, and Inflection.

QWhat was Entropy's final product pivot before shutting down?

AEntropy's final pivot was to reposition itself as a crypto automation platform, described by its CEO as 'basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto', which featured automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation using trusted execution environments, and deep AI integrations.

QWhat did Entropy's founder, Tux Pacific, announce about his future plans?

ATux Pacific announced that he plans to step back before deciding his next move and expressed that his time in crypto might be concluding. He stated he is drawn to the pharmaceutical industry and wants to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

QHow did Entropy initially position itself in the market at its launch?

AAt its launch, Entropy positioned itself as a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, relying on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to give users control over fund movements with rule-based constraints.

Пов'язані матеріали

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit10 хв тому

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit10 хв тому

Bitcoin Bull Michael Saylor Hints At Next Purchase With Cryptic Post

MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) has declined sharply, dropping over 9% in a day and 25% over the past month, following the company's first Bitcoin sale in years. The firm sold 32 BTC for approximately $2.5 million, raising investor concerns about further sales. Meanwhile, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor sparked speculation of a renewed Bitcoin purchase with an unusual midweek social media post stating "Back to Work," breaking from his typical Sunday routine. The company holds about $900 million in cash and recently raised $128 million through share sales. Despite the recent activity, MicroStrategy remains the world's largest corporate Bitcoin holder with 843,706 BTC. Additional speculation arose from the firm moving Bitcoin to Coinbase Prime.

bitcoinist28 хв тому

Bitcoin Bull Michael Saylor Hints At Next Purchase With Cryptic Post

bitcoinist28 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit50 хв тому

marsbit50 хв тому

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

Elon Musk is on the verge of becoming the world's first trillionaire, with a current estimated net worth of $970 billion. This wealth, largely tied to equity in SpaceX and Tesla, translates to him accumulating roughly $992 per second or $3.6 million per hour on average over his 31-year career. His fortune surpasses the annual GDP of over 125 countries and represents about 3% of U.S. GDP, double the relative wealth of historical figures like John D. Rockefeller. For perspective, an average U.S. household earning the median income would need to work over 11 million years to amass a comparable sum. Musk's wealth could buy approximately 2.4 million average American homes, all 32 NFL teams plus every NBA team, or over 10,000 private jets with operating costs. The analysis highlights the staggering scale and concentration of modern wealth, driven by successes in electric vehicles, space exploration, and artificial intelligence.

marsbit53 хв тому

Visualizing Musk's Wealth: $3.6 Million Per Hour, Average Person Needs 11 Million Years of Work

marsbit53 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit57 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit57 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси