Analyzing Virtuals Protocol’s bounce from golden pocket – Will $1 be next?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-24

Анотація

Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) saw an 83% surge in daily trading volume and a 3% price increase in the past 24 hours. However, market sentiment remains bearish, indicated by a predominantly negative funding rate and only a slight 1.75% rise in Open Interest. Despite a bearish higher timeframe trend, the token defended the $0.68 support level after a rejection at $0.82. This bullish reaction suggests potential gains ahead, with a rally toward the $0.875–$0.955 range likely. In the coming weeks, VIRTUAL could target $1, especially if the current bullish structure holds.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] witnessed an 83% boost in daily trading volume and saw a 3% price gain in the past 24 hours. Its Open Interest [OI] was only up 1.75%, which suggested speculative conviction behind the AI token was relatively weak.

Source: Coinalyze

Coinalyze data showed that the Funding Rate was predominantly negative over the past week.

At the same time, the Spot CVD has been flat. Combined with the weak increase in OI, it showed that the VIRTUAL market sentiment remained bearish.

Let’s break it down from the higher timeframes.

Source: VIRTUAL/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-day chart, the trend was bearish. The swing structure was bearish, and a set of Fibonacci retracement levels (white) was plotted using this.

At the same time, the internal structure was bullish.

The price faced rejection from the $0.82 level, the 50% retracement (white), but the $0.68 local support zone was defended.

This meant that further gains were likely. With Bitcoin [BTC] also back above $70k, the next week or two could see the bulls in control.

Virtuals Protocol token has completed its retracement

A week ago, AMBCrypto pointed out that downside risks were present for the popular AI token. This warning has been proven right, with VIRTUAL retracing from $0.82 to $0.64, a 22% move at its zenith.

This retracement was a healthy one for the bulls in the short-term. At the same time, the long-term structure was bearish. Traders can wait for a move toward $1 before they can begin to anticipate a bearish reaction.

Source: VIRTUAL/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour timeframe showed that the $0.665 level was the 78.6% retracement (light blue) of the previous impulse move VIRTUAL made, from $0.62 to $0.82. A bullish reaction at this key retracement level confirmed this bias.

Therefore, it is highly likely that Virtuals Protocol token prices would rally toward $0.875-$0.955 levels next. These were the 23.6% and 61.8% extension levels of this timeframe’s swing structure.


Final Summary

  • Virtuals Protocol exhibited a negative Funding Rate and low Open Interest despite its gains in the past 24 hours.
  • The defense of the $0.66-$0.68 zone confirmed bullish strength and VIRTUAL could rally to $0.95-$1.04 in the coming weeks.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat were the key changes in Virtuals Protocol's trading volume and price in the past 24 hours?

AVirtuals Protocol witnessed an 83% boost in daily trading volume and a 3% price gain in the past 24 hours.

QWhat did the Open Interest (OI) and Funding Rate data suggest about market sentiment for VIRTUAL?

AThe Open Interest was only up 1.75%, and the Funding Rate was predominantly negative over the past week, suggesting speculative conviction was weak and market sentiment remained bearish.

QWhich key support level was defended, indicating potential for further gains?

AThe $0.68 local support zone was defended, which indicated that further gains were likely.

QWhat price levels are VIRTUAL expected to rally towards next according to the analysis?

AVIRTUAL is expected to rally toward the $0.875-$0.955 levels next, and potentially reach $0.95-$1.04 in the coming weeks.

QWhy was the recent retracement from $0.82 to $0.64 considered healthy for the bulls?

AThe retracement was considered healthy for the bulls in the short-term as it allowed for a bullish reaction at a key retracement level, confirming strength and setting the stage for a potential rally.

Пов'язані матеріали

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3 хв тому

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片