An Undisclosed Loan Exposes the Ties Between the U.S. Commerce Secretary and Tether

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-19

Анотація

A previously unreported loan from Tether to a trust benefiting the children of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has raised ethical concerns. In October, Lutnick sold his multibillion-dollar stake in Cantor Fitzgerald to trusts for his four children to comply with federal ethics rules. Around the same time, one trust, Dynasty Trust A, borrowed an undisclosed sum from Tether, the stablecoin issuer. The loan was collateralized by the trust's assets, which include a majority stake in Cantor, and by a convertible note giving Cantor rights to 5% of Tether. Ethics experts argue this transaction may violate the intent of federal divestiture requirements, as the loan from Tether—a firm with significant business ties to Cantor—could create a new conflict of interest. Cantor has managed Tether's reserves since 2021 and made a $600 million investment in Tether in 2024, which has appreciated significantly. As Commerce Secretary, Lutnick has been involved in crypto policy, including the pro-industry GENIUS Act, which contained provisions beneficial to Tether. The White House and a Cantor spokesman stated that Lutnick has complied with all ethics agreements. The loan's terms and the sale price to Lutnick's children were not disclosed.

Written by: David Kocieniewski, Anthony Cormier, Todd Gillespie, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Last October, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sold his multibillion-dollar stake in Cantor Fitzgerald to a trust benefiting his four children. This arrangement was intended to comply with federal ethics rules for the financial services firm he has led for over three decades.

Around the same time, one of these trusts made an unusual move. The "Dynasty Trust A," which benefits all four children, borrowed an undisclosed amount from the stablecoin issuer Tether. Through a 2024 investment, Tether has helped Cantor Fitzgerald's assets soar to new heights, and its overseas controlling shareholders have been advocating for more favorable regulatory policies for U.S. cryptocurrencies.

A spokesperson for Cantor Fitzgerald and Lutnick's children declined to discuss the loan size or whether the funds were used to finance any part of the asset sale. But spokesperson Stan Neve stated that the acquisition "was financed through multiple funding sources, multiple companies, and multiple trusts, at market rates and market prices," in compliance with the federal ethics agreement signed by Howard Lutnick. This loan had not been previously reported.

February 2026, Tether logo on cushions at the Bithumb exchange in Seoul

A credit filing submitted on October 7 in New York State shows that the loan is collateralized by "all assets" held by the trust, including any assets it may acquire in the future. A Cantor executive familiar with the transaction said the loan is backed by a convertible bond that gives Cantor the right to acquire a 5% stake in Tether.

According to a recent filing by the financial services company, Dynasty Trust A's assets include more than half of Cantor Fitzgerald's equity. But Neve stated that, through another independently managed entity, control of the company is "held entirely by the next generation of the Lutnick family and has never been pledged."

By selling the assets, Lutnick met the requirements of federal regulations designed to eliminate potential conflicts of interest for presidential appointees. However, experts who reviewed the transaction documents say that if the loan helped facilitate Lutnick's sale of equity to his children's trust, it undermines the intent of the federal divestiture requirements.

"This transaction, which was theoretically supposed to eliminate a conflict of interest, actually created a new one," said Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis and former ethics legal counsel for the District of Columbia. She stated that if Tether's loan helped Lutnick complete a transaction that ultimately benefits both him and his children, it means his family owes Tether another favor. This also raises concerns that Howard Lutnick might use his government position to benefit Tether and his children rather than serving the public interest.

A Cantor Fitzgerald executive familiar with the matter disputed Clark's view, stating that the loan does not alter the "already strong economic and strategic alliance" between Tether and the company. A Tether spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

A U.S. Commerce Department spokesperson did not respond to a series of questions but sent a statement: "Secretary Lutnick has fully complied with the terms of his ethics agreement, including all divestiture and recusal requirements, and will continue to do so."

The amount of the loan provided by Tether to the trust remains unclear, and the price at which Lutnick's children acquired their father's equity has not been disclosed. But as CEO and chairman, Lutnick held the vast majority of the company's equity. After the investment in Tether in 2024, the book value of the company surged by billions of dollars.

Tether's core business is issuing the stablecoin USDT, a digital currency pegged to the U.S. dollar; holders can conduct instant, low-fee transactions outside the traditional banking system. For every USDT issued, Tether is supposed to hold high-quality, liquid reserve assets as backing. Last year, Tether disclosed that its reserves reached $192 billion; since 2021, Cantor has been earning fees by managing these funds. Tether's business is highly profitable, reportedly generating $10 billion in profit last year with a profit margin of 99%.

The success of this stablecoin company has also been accompanied by controversy. In 2021, U.S. regulators accused Tether and its affiliated companies of making misleading statements about losses and reserves, resulting in fines of approximately $60 million, though the companies did not admit any wrongdoing. According to two people familiar with the matter, Tether was also investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice in 2024, though the current status of the investigation is unclear.

Meanwhile, the Donald Trump administration relaxed enforcement against cryptocurrencies, disbanding teams at the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission responsible for investigating cryptocurrency-related crimes. In 2024, a United Nations report called Tether the "preferred tool" for Southeast Asian gangs and money launderers. Tether responded at the time that it cooperates with law enforcement agencies worldwide and conducts comprehensive, high-standard monitoring of its tokens.

Before partnering with Cantor in 2021, most U.S. banks avoided doing business with Tether. Lutnick has said that he personally negotiated the partnership with the company and reviewed its books to ensure it held all the assets it claimed. At his Senate confirmation hearing, he stated that Tether executives assured him they would cooperate with law enforcement and take a series of measures to curb money laundering.

In April 2024, Lutnick participated in Cantor Fitzgerald's investment negotiations with Tether. Bloomberg reported that the investment took the form of a $600 million convertible bond, giving the financial services company a 5% equity stake. The book value of this stake has risen significantly, and if Tether achieves its goal of a $500 billion valuation in recent talks with potential investors, the stake could be worth $25 billion—more than the sum of all the company's other assets.

After Trump's re-election in November 2024, Lutnick helped lead his transition team, while Cantor continued to work with Tether on various deals. In December 2024, Cantor arranged a deal for Tether to invest $775 million in the loss-making video-sharing platform Rumble Inc. In April 2025, Tether and Cantor jointly with SoftBank Group announced the formation of Bitcoin treasury management company Twenty One Capital Inc.

Twenty One Capital listed on the New York Stock Exchange in December 2025

In July 2025, Trump signed the GENIUS Act, landmark legislation for the stablecoin industry. The act included several provisions favorable to Tether, such as providing a three-year grace period for the El Salvador-based company before it must comply with U.S. regulations.

White House spokesperson Kush Desai, responding to questions about Lutnick's divestiture and the Tether loan, said: "The only special interest guiding the Trump administration's decisions is the best interest of the American people. By achieving historic trade and investment agreements, leveling the playing field, and creating jobs for American workers, Secretary Lutnick has always put the American people and America first."

In February 2025, Lutnick handed over the roles of chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald to his 28-year-old son, Brandon. Brandon had worked with Tether in Lugano, Switzerland, and recently described his "deepening friendship" with Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino.

As a Wall Street billionaire, Lutnick faced a complex task in divesting his assets. His financial disclosure listed over 800 assets, from stocks and apartment complexes to a satellite company. An official involved in the disclosure, who requested anonymity, said Lutnick held stakes in so many subsidiaries and joint ventures that lawyers reviewing his divestiture agreement were concerned they couldn't trace where all his financial interests were going.

In January 2025, Lutnick sought to allay these concerns by submitting an ethics agreement stating he would seek to divest his equity stakes and resign from management positions in his companies. Since some transactions required regulatory approval and could take time, Lutnick said that unless granted an ethics waiver, he would not "participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that would directly and predictably affect the divested enterprises."

July 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump displays a copy of the GENIUS Act in Washington

Early in the administration, Lutnick joined the cryptocurrency policy steering group, then agreed in May to lock in the price of his assets, forgoing future appreciation. On July 8, he received a limited ethics waiver allowing him to participate in "high-level strategic and execution" discussions on issues that could have a "minimal impact" on the companies he sold but was barred from participating in matters that would directly affect those companies. He completed the sale of the Cantor assets in October.

Lutnick is one of more than a dozen members of the President's Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, which held over a thousand meetings with industry officials in the late winter and spring of last year. On July 30, the group released a 160-page report outlining the administration's plans. Three of Lutnick's colleagues at the Commerce Department contributed to the document.

The group's recommendations included "promoting the development and growth of stablecoins," a market where Tether holds about two-thirds share. The report stated: "Policymakers should encourage the adoption of stablecoins to enhance the dollar's dominance in the digital age." The group praised the GENIUS Act, for which both Cantor Fitzgerald and Tether had lobbied heavily.

Before his confirmation hearing, Lutnick was asked about his relationship with Tether and responded that he would "faithfully perform his duties in accordance with applicable government ethics laws and regulations."

On May 19, Cantor Fitzgerald and its affiliates announced they had reached an agreement to sell most of their business to Lutnick's children, calling it a move toward "next-generation succession."

The asset sale was completed on October 6. Lutnick's stakes in Cantor Fitzgerald's publicly traded affiliates—commercial real estate company Newmark Group Inc. and brokerage firm BCG Group Inc.—were repurchased by Cantor and the two companies for a total of over $350 million.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the purpose of Howard Lutnick selling his stake in Cantor Fitzgerald to a trust for his children?

AThe purpose was to comply with federal ethics requirements for his position as US Commerce Secretary.

QWhich entity provided an undisclosed loan to the 'Dynasty Trust A' and what was used as collateral?

ATether provided the loan, and it was collateralized by 'all assets' of the trust, including a convertible bond that gives Cantor the right to acquire a 5% stake in Tether.

QWhat potential ethical concern did the loan from Tether raise according to experts who reviewed the transaction?

AExperts stated that if the loan helped finance Lutnick's sale of his stake to his children's trust, it created a new conflict of interest, as it could mean the Lutnick family now owes a favor to Tether, raising concerns that the Secretary might use his government position to benefit Tether and his family rather than the public interest.

QWhat significant legislation did the Trump administration pass that benefited Tether, and what was one favorable provision for the company?

AThe Trump administration passed the GENIUS Act, which provided a three-year grace period for Tether, a company based in El Salvador, before it must comply with US regulations.

QWhat role did Howard Lutnick play in the US government regarding cryptocurrency policy after his appointment?

ALutnick was a member of the Presidential Digital Asset Markets Working Group, which held over a thousand meetings with industry officials and produced a 160-page report outlining the administration's plans, including recommendations to 'promote the development and growth of stablecoins'.

Пов'язані матеріали

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit27 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit27 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手34 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手34 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 год тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片