Algorand Foundation cuts 25% of workforce, citing macro and market pressures

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-20

Анотація

The Algorand Foundation has laid off 25% of its workforce, citing macroeconomic environment and a broader crypto market downturn as reasons. The foundation stated this restructuring allows it to sustainably align resources with its long-term goals. This follows similar cuts at other crypto entities like the Hedera Foundation, Blockworks, and Crypto.com, the latter also pointing to AI disruption. Community reaction was mixed, with some criticizing the foundation's leadership and spending. A transparency report noted the AF spent $12 million after selling millions of ALGO tokens, while a critic pointed to a lack of liquidity, users, and funding. Data confirms a significant decline in the chain's activity; its DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) has halved since last year to under $40 million, and daily fees remain below $50. Consequently, the price of ALGO dropped roughly 10% amid a wider market pullback.

The Algorand Foundation (AF), the steward of the Algorand chain, is in the news after it announced it has axed 25% of its workforce.

According to the AF, the restructuring was informed by the ongoing “global macro environment” and “broader downturn in crypto markets.”

Source: X

Following the layoffs, AF now believes it is lean enough to “sustainably align” the remaining resources with the protocol’s long-term goals.

However, the ongoing crypto rout is not affecting Algorand alone. In January, the Hedera Foundation declared some of its core functions redundant and let go of employees who handled them.

Beyond protocols, crypto media has also been hit, with Blockworks axing its entire newsroom last year.

Besides, pressure is also coming from AI adoption, which, like other global segments, is disrupting the crypto market labour sector. This week, crypto exchange Crypto.com let go 12% of its workforce, citing the need to position itself to rising AI capabilities.

That said, the AF layoffs were met with mixed reactions.

Community and ALGO reaction

As expected, a section of the community sympathized with those affected by the AF layoffs and the disrupted livelihoods.

However, one user pointed out that the AF spent $100 million last year and yet, saw no meaningful impact.

He added,

Using macro uncertainty as cover for doing this feels piss weak. Love the tech. Hate the leadership. Same issues as always. No liquidity. No users. No funding. No mindshare.

According to the AF transparency report, it spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens. Its overall expenditure has been around $18 million per year, covering even staff, which includes 65 employees.

However, the critic was right about lagging chain activity. Its stablecoin liquidity has been declining alongside DeFi activity, as shown by the TVL (total value locked) drop.

Source: DeFiLlama

Since last year, DeFi activity has dropped by half, slipping from $80 million to below $40 million. In fact, the chain’s fees have been hovering below $50 throughout last year.

Meanwhile, ALGO was down about 10% and traded at $0.088 at the time of writing, amid a broader pullback following de-risking linked to traders’ caution after the Fed rate decision.


Final Summary

  • Algorand Foundation axed 25% of its workforce, as bear market, geopolitical tensions, and AI disrupted the labor sector in the space.
  • Algorand chain activity has slowed down with DeFi activity by half, generating less than $50 in daily average fees.

Пов'язані питання

QWhy did the Algorand Foundation lay off 25% of its workforce?

AThe Algorand Foundation cited the ongoing 'global macro environment' and 'broader downturn in crypto markets' as reasons for the layoffs.

QHow has the Algorand chain's DeFi activity changed in the past year?

ADeFi activity on the Algorand chain has dropped by half, falling from $80 million to below $40 million in total value locked (TVL).

QWhat was the community's reaction to the Algorand Foundation's decision?

AThe community had mixed reactions. Some sympathized with the affected employees, while others criticized the leadership for poor performance, citing a lack of liquidity, users, funding, and mindshare despite significant spending.

QHow much did the Algorand Foundation spend according to its transparency report as of September 2025?

AAccording to its transparency report, the Algorand Foundation spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens, with an overall annual expenditure of around $18 million.

QWhat other companies in the crypto space have recently announced layoffs?

AOther companies that have recently announced layoffs include the Hedera Foundation, which declared some core functions redundant, crypto media outlet Blockworks, which axed its entire newsroom last year, and Crypto.com, which let go of 12% of its workforce citing the need to adapt to rising AI capabilities.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit10 хв тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit10 хв тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手13 хв тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手13 хв тому

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit2 год тому

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片