After Three Years at Multicoin, My Thoughts on Kyle the 'Shill King' Announcing His Exit

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-06

Анотація

Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, is stepping back from the firm, a move that reflects his strategic focus on pursuing asymmetric, non-consensual bets rather than managing a conventional fund. According to the author, a former Multicoin partner, Samani excelled at identifying and investing in high-conviction, contrarian theses—such as Solana’s potential as a "Nasdaq on-chain"—long before they gained mainstream acceptance. While some have questioned why Multicoin missed certain trends in the current cycle, like leading perpetual DEXs, the author explains that these areas had already become consensus plays, which did not align with Samani’s investment philosophy. His strength lay in early, non-consensus conviction. The author expresses confidence in Multicoin’s remaining team, noting their expertise in on-chain trading, AI, and regulatory strategy. Meanwhile, Samani is expected to explore new ventures, possibly in data-centric businesses. The piece concludes with a personal reflection: everyone has a unique “game” they are meant to play. For Samani, it was asymmetric investing; for the author, it’s building value-transfer protocols. The key is to focus on what one does best and play to win.

Author: mable.sol(Former Multicoin Capital Partner Mable Jiang)

Compiled by: Ken, Chaincatcher

Everyone can only excel at one type of game. You should spend half your time figuring out what game you're good at, and the other half fully focused on playing it well.

Kyle Samani knew exactly what his was.

His strategy was to first develop a theory, then find the right projects—and persistently wait for the theory to be validated (while occasionally assessing if the theory still held). In building a "Nasdaq on-chain" with Solana, he saw this thesis from the very beginning (even though Solana is still some distance from this vision today, that's not the point), and executed this strategy by leading multiple rounds of financing—even participating in discounted OTC rounds long after SOL's mainnet beta launch. He did everything he could to facilitate Solana's development.

His core gamble was in finding asymmetric opportunities, i.e., non-consensus bets. Haseeb was right: probably no one is better at this than Kyle.

People question why Multicoin didn't capture any of the leading perpetual DEXs or related infrastructure this cycle. No one knows better than I do that Multicoin was a firm believer in perpetual DEXs long before anything existed this cycle. Even before many in the industry understood how central limit order books worked—you'd be surprised, but it's true, after all many of us were originally cypherpunks who later adapted to become trading experts (laughs). Multicoin studied basically every perpetual DEX and analyzed the trade-offs. There were many blog posts about the design space and why certain designs were better—you can find them on multicoin.capital.

So why did they "miss" it? Because perpetual DEXs and on-chain liquidity—these are no longer non-consensus bets. Of course, they still have huge growth potential. But consensus bets hold no appeal for Kyle. That was never his game.

And for a fund, the goal is to make money for LPs. So, managing a fund by the book is no longer the game Kyle wants to focus on playing. Running a data company might be something he's interested in—this has never been successfully done before (if you're interested, you can probably listen to the podcast I did with him on FWRD). There are still many asymmetric opportunities in the world waiting to be discovered. Kyle knows his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he's good at and interested in.

No one needs to worry about who is moving on to other fields. When you know what your game is, you should focus on playing it well and aim to win. Winning isn't the entire purpose, but devising a winning strategy is part of the game experience.

Many worry about what Multicoin will be like without Kyle. But I'm not worried, because I know the opportunities ahead for all of us align with the strengths of Tushar, Brian, Spencer, Shayon, Vishal, Matt, Greg, and the rest of the team: on-chain trading, AI, and compliance. As long as the team focuses on playing this game correctly, it will remain top-tier in the industry.

For me, I've been a builder for almost four years now. Looking back, my time at Multicoin was unique—intense debates with Kyle in investment committee meetings, strategic exchanges with Tushar, and exploring the design space of many things with every IC member. I know I can't be as good as any of them, but I've also found my passion and the field of play that belongs to me.

For Kyle, the Web3 dream has turned into nothing but cold ledgers. For me, in this highly commoditized world, these ledgers condense real value transfer. When all other filtering mechanisms completely fail, money becomes the world's only relatively scarce resource to express opinions—and in the near future,恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕连金钱本身也算不上了恐怕极有可能连金钱本身也算不上了。This is why I am building an asset generation protocol (@trendsdotfun).

He and I never needed to agree on what game to play. But we sincerely wish each other well and will cheer for each other from the sidelines.

You only live once, focus on the game you are best at.

I'm just playing games, but I play to win.

Take it easy, but don't slack off.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was Kyle Samani's core investment strategy at Multicoin Capital according to the author?

AKyle Samani's core strategy was to first develop a theory, then find projects that fit that theory, while persistently waiting for the theory to be validated. He focused on finding asymmetric opportunities and non-consensus bets, such as his early and continued investment in Solana to build a 'Nasdaq on-chain'.

QWhy did Multicoin Capital 'miss' investing in leading perpetual decentralized exchanges (DEXs) this cycle?

AMulticoin missed investing in leading perpetual DEXs because these opportunities were no longer non-consensus bets. While they had significant growth potential, Kyle was not attracted to consensus bets, as that was never his game. The fund had extensively researched perpetual DEXs but chose to focus on asymmetric, non-consensus opportunities instead.

QWhat are the new focus areas for Multicoin Capital after Kyle's departure, as mentioned by the author?

AThe new focus areas for Multicoin Capital are on-chain trading, artificial intelligence, and compliance. The author expresses confidence in the remaining team members, including Tushar, Brian, Spencer, Shayon, Vishal, Matt, and Greg, to excel in these areas.

QWhat personal project is the author, Mable Jiang, building and why?

AMable Jiang is building an asset generation protocol called @trendsdotfun. She believes that in a highly commoditized world, ledgers凝结了真实的价值传输 (condense real value transfer), and money is becoming the only relatively scarce resource to express opinions. Her project aims to address this.

QWhat is the overarching life and career advice the author gives based on her experience with Kyle?

AThe overarching advice is that everyone should spend half their time figuring out what game they are good at and the other half fully focused on playing that game well. The goal is not just to win, but formulating a winning strategy is part of the experience. One should focus on the game they are best at and play to win.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报33 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报33 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News51 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News51 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片