After the Secret Meeting, Why Did Trump Aim His Fire at Banks?

比推Опубліковано о 2026-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-05

Анотація

President Trump met privately with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, after which he publicly criticized major banks on Truth Social. Trump accused the banks of trying to undermine the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and called for the advancement of the CLARITY Act, arguing that Americans should earn more from their money and that the crypto agenda should not be blocked. The meeting, first reported by Politico, occurred shortly before Trump's social media post, revealing a direct link between the private discussion and his public stance. The key legislative conflict involves a stalled crypto market structure bill. Banks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto firms, including Coinbase, argue that the GENIUS Act rightly allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon stated that stablecoin issuers paying interest should be regulated like banks, a claim countered by crypto advocates who emphasize that the GENIUS Act prohibits such issuers from lending or rehypothecating underlying funds. Following these developments, crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase (COIN), saw significant gains amid a broader market rally.

Author: CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: Before Trump Slammed Banks, Coinbase CEO Had Just Met with Him Secretly


Deep Tide Introduction: CoinDesk exclusively confirmed a key timeline: Coinbase CEO Armstrong first met privately with Trump, after which Trump publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing crypto legislation.

This clue directly reveals the lobbying path behind Trump's statement, making the legislative battle between the crypto industry and the banking sector clearer.

Full Text Below:

Key Points:

  • Before publicly accusing banks of undermining the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and calling for the advancement of the CLARITY Act, Trump had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.

  • The meeting was first disclosed by Politico and occurred shortly before Trump posted on Truth Social, stating that banks "need to make a good deal with the crypto industry" to push forward stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.

  • The crypto market structure bill has stalled because banks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto companies argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

CoinDesk confirmed that U.S. President Trump held a closed-door meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, shortly after which Trump posted on Truth Social, stating that banks are trying to undermine the GENIUS Act.

"America needs market structure legislation done ASAP. Americans should be making more money from their money," Trump wrote in a post on Tuesday. "The big banks are making historic profits, and we won’t allow them to undermine our strong crypto agenda—if we don’t advance the CLARITY Act, all of this will go to China and other countries."

Politico first reported the meeting between Armstrong and Trump. Since then, Trump has publicly supported Coinbase's stance in the "ongoing lobbying battle with banks," a conflict that has stalled a major crypto bill.

The media cited "two people familiar with the matter" as sources, who spoke anonymously to discuss the closed-door event. The report also noted that it remains unclear what exactly the two discussed during the meeting.

However, the report reiterated that "the meeting took place shortly before Trump posted on social media, stating that banks 'need to make a good deal with the crypto industry,'" which is a key point in pushing forward the stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.

The White House and Coinbase did not respond to CoinDesk's requests for comment.

The market structure bill has been in limbo since the Senate Banking Committee originally scheduled a debate and vote. The core disagreement blocking the bill's passage is that banks believe stablecoin interest rates could impact bank deposits, thereby affecting their lending capacity; crypto exchanges argue that users should have the right to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings, which the GENIUS Act explicitly allows.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks. Patrick White, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Committee, countered this, stating, "What truly requires bank-like regulation is not the act of paying yields on balances itself, but the act of lending or rehypothecating the underlying dollars that make up the balances." White also noted that the GENIUS Act "explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from engaging in the latter. Stablecoins ≠ deposits."

Crypto-related stocks surged significantly on Wednesday amid a broad crypto market rebound, with COIN breaking above $200, reaching its highest price since late January.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617080

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the key sequence of events involving Trump and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had a private meeting with Donald Trump, shortly after which Trump publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and called for advancing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the main legislative conflict between banks and the crypto industry as described in the article?

ABanks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto firms argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

QHow did Trump's public statement on Truth Social frame the issue between banks and the crypto industry?

ATrump stated that banks are trying to undermine the strong crypto agenda, that Americans should earn more from their money, and that without advancing the CLARITY Act, crypto innovation would move to China and other countries.

QWhat was Jamie Dimon's position on stablecoin regulation, and how was it countered?

AJamie Dimon argued that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposits should be regulated like banks. Patrick White countered that the real need for bank-like regulation is not for paying yield on balances, but for lending or rehypothecating the underlying dollars, which the GENIUS Act explicitly prohibits.

QWhat was the market reaction following the news of Trump's meeting and statements?

ACrypto-related stocks, including COIN (Coinbase), saw significant gains, with COIN surpassing $200, reaching its highest price since late January, amid a broad crypto market rally.

Пов'язані матеріали

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 год тому

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 год тому

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片