After Chasing All Airdrops, the Biggest One Turns Out to Be Yuanbao

比推Опубліковано о 2026-02-04Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-04

Анотація

The article, titled "The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto People is Given by Yuanbao," discusses the recent popularity of Yuanbao's cash red packet campaign in the crypto community. Amid a significant market downturn in late January, where cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum saw sharp declines, many crypto traders turned to claiming small cash rewards from Yuanbao as a form of psychological relief. The author contrasts Web2 and Web3 airdrop models: Yuanbao, backed by Tencent, offers simple, no-cost cash rewards with high certainty, while crypto project airdrops often involve high costs (time, capital, effort) and uncertain returns, sometimes resulting in net losses for users—exemplified by cases like Infinex, where users faced substantial financial setbacks despite long-term participation. The piece argues that crypto airdrops have shifted from rewarding early users to serving as exit strategies for projects, reducing user trust and retention. It concludes that while airdrops can drive user acquisition, long-term retention depends on product-market fit and user experience—areas where Web3 projects can learn from Web2 giants like Tencent.

Author: Golem(@web 3_golem), Odaily Planet Daily

Original Title: The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto People Is Given by Yuanbao


"xxx has sent you a cash red envelope!"

After Yuanbao's cash red envelope activity began on February 1st, many long-dead project/research exchange groups completely transformed into "grab Yuanbao wool" mutual aid groups.

For crypto people, switching from being esteemed crypto traders to wool parties grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes is also a helpless move.

Starting from January 31st, global financial markets plummeted. Precious metals, which had previously surged, quickly crashed. Spot silver nearly erased its yearly gains, and spot gold once fell below $4500. The crypto market wasn't much better. On February 2nd, Bitcoin broke below the $75,000 support level, touching a low of $74,604. ETH fell to a low of $2157.14, and SOL even fell below $100, touching a low of $95.95.

According to Coinglass data, the crypto market's total liquidation amount reached $2.5615 billion on January 31st, setting a record for the highest single-day liquidation volume since the "10.11 crash." Therefore, "too亏损到不想说话 (losing so much I don't want to talk)" became the true psychological state of many crypto people (like the silent Yi Lihua).

For crypto people who just experienced a bloodbath, grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes, though a drop in the bucket for recouping losses, can provide some psychological comfort, temporarily escaping the harsh market reality.

Joke in group chat

Crypto Airdrops: From Swallowing Losses Silently to Passionate Rights Protection

Saying that Yuanbao's cash red envelope is the biggest airdrop for crypto people today is not a gimmick.

The amount Yuanbao can distribute to each user in cash red envelopes is not large, mostly ranging from ten to几十 (a few tens) RMB, but its value lies in its simple interaction and truly zero cost. Users only need to spend a little time recruiting people and step-by-step experiencing product features to get cash red envelopes, with a short task cycle enabling quick returns.

In contrast, project airdrops in the crypto space are first distributed in token form. Profit is truly realized only after the tokens are sold. Although the single received amount seems much larger than Yuanbao's, after deducting time, research, opportunity, wear and tear, and potential costs of being stuck with unsellable tokens, how much is left?

A user who accompanied Infinex for 406 days deeply feels this. On January 31st, the decentralized perpetual contract trading platform Infinex announced TGE and airdrop claims. The project team successfully上岸 (made it ashore), but the community was collectively反撸 (reverse-fleeced).

一千万是只猫 (X:@RXu107) is a typical representative of being reverse-fleeced. On February 1st, he posted that he spent over $11,900 (approx. RMB 82,000) participating in this project (4400 U for NFT, 7500 U for public sale) and作为社区成员深度陪跑了 406天 (accompanied deeply as a community member for 406 days). But on TGE day, not only did he not recover his costs, but his paper loss also exceeded 100,000 RMB (2900 U + 11,284 locked INX tokens).

Faced with the reverse-fleece, the blogger had no choice but to repeatedly tell his friends how难受 (awful) he felt.

Blogger reverse-fleeced by Infinex tells friend he feels awful

At Infinex's TGE, the fully diluted valuation was only $150 million. The total投入 (input) for Yuanbao's New Year red envelope activity is approximately $140 million USD. What does this mean? It's equivalent to Tencent directly buying Infinex at its maximum valuation and giving it away for free to the whole nation.

Faced with the pain of being reverse-fleeced and deceived, most people in the community choose the same approach as "一千万是只猫"—swallow the loss silently. But some choose to stand up and confront the project team.

Crypto blogger Ice Frog (X:@Ice_Frog666666) is a typical representative. He started by撸毛 (wool grabbing), but ironically, in 2025, Ice Frog was either engaged in airdrop rights protection or on his way to airdrop rights protection. He is currently still negotiating with the prediction market project Space (Odaily Note: Space raised $20 million publicly, team privately took $13 million) and has even taken legal measures.

Web2 Can Afford to Deliver Airdrops, Web3 Can't Afford to Keep Promises

The most ironic point is that today's "input-reward" imbalance in crypto airdrops is not the "moral decay" of a single project, but the result of a整套行业结构变化 (complete set of industry structural changes).

In 2020, Uniswap opened the era of crypto project airdrops. Since then, there have been constant major airdrop opportunities in the crypto space. Stories of getting a car from an airdrop, swapping an airdrop for a house, or reaching A8 (wealth level) through airdrops attracted batch after batch of people into the wool grabbing track, presenting an aesthetic of "the industry is on the rise."

But by 2025, this changed. Market narratives dried up, primary financing weakened, secondary buying power was insufficient. Airdrops were no longer about sharing the future with early users, but more like mortgaging the future for present data, creating an exit path for the project team itself or换取下一轮融资窗口 (exchanging for the next financing window). Thus, major airdrops disappeared, small airdrops shrank, and "being reverse-fleeced" became the industry norm.

The so-called airdrop is just rewriting the advertising budget into a reward pool, bypassing third parties to directly establish growth relationships with users. Whether it's the 1 billion RMB given by Web2's Yuanbao or the fixed airdrop allocation in Web3 project tokenomics, the essence is this logic.

But the difference is that Web2 giants use cash to buy user certainty, while Web3 offers token returns as a promise that may be fulfilled. This results in the same tactic leading to two different destinies.

The certainty of Yuanbao's cash red envelopes comes from cash flow and约束机制 (binding mechanisms). Tencent's strong cash flow determines that Yuanbao "can pay out." The binding mechanisms under mature laws determine that Yuanbao "cannot renege." Coupled with the "simple and brainless" barrier-free interaction, users naturally understand it as a "welfare."

In contrast, crypto people not only付出 (pay) costs several times higher than Web2 wool grabbing (e.g., capital, time, energy) but also worry about being sybil attacked, token lock-up periods, and ever-changing airdrop rules. The most ironic thing is that the收益 (returns) obtained in the end are not as good as Yuanbao's.

Therefore, today's crypto airdrops have long degenerated from direct growth rewards into promises with constantly deferred fulfillment, or even unfulfilled promises. If this situation does not change in 2026, the user retention rate will be sacrificed along with it.

From User Growth to Retention, Airdrop Utility Can Only Support the First Half at Most

Using airdrops for user growth has always been the most common and direct means in the business world to deal with strong competitors.

Tencent invested 1 billion RMB cash to support Yuanbao because its competitor Doubao is strong enough. By the end of 2025, Doubao was the first AI product in China to exceed 100 million daily active users. The same goes for Web3. In the prediction market track, Polymarket dominates. To grab users, Opinion, predict.fun, and Limitless also use points airdrops for user growth, directly pulling users into the product.

In the short term, airdrops can indeed create a huge user influx entry point. But in the long run, what determines user retention is still product-market fit, user experience, and ecological linkage. In Web3's business history, there are no shortage of project cases that were bustling before the airdrop but became deserted afterwards. Therefore, both Web2 and Web3 face the same "post-airdrop problem": how to retain users.

Ten years ago, Tencent, a company good at imitating first and then surpassing, used "WeChat Red Envelopes" to push WeChat Pay into a national-level入口 (entry point), proving its extreme familiarity with the "user growth → retention → habit" chain. Whether they can create another miracle for Yuanbao in the same way is still debated, but they at least have ample experience in "how to convert airdrops into retention."

To this end, Odaily Planet Daily contacted a certain Yuanbao insider and asked from a product perspective how Web3 project airdrops should be improved. The answer was very practical:

"As one of the internet companies with the largest market capitalization, Web3 projects may not have direct references from Tencent. But the core of user growth methods like airdrops is still to improve retention. This requires a series of联动 (linkages) after the airdrop. For example, PR and marketing need to think about how to further spread the玩法 (gameplay/mechanics). The product side also needs to make more moves to achieve this."

From the perspective of Web3 practitioners,只聊流量玩法终觉浅 (only discussing traffic tactics feels shallow in the end). What product features, beyond the token, can actually retain users is更值得推敲 (more worth scrutinizing).


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Exchange Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush


Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608562

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main point of the article regarding the comparison between Web2 and Web3 airdrops?

AThe article argues that Web2 airdrops, like Yuanbao's cash red packets, offer small but guaranteed and frictionless rewards, while Web3 airdrops often require significant investment of time, money, and effort, yet yield uncertain returns due to factors like token lock-ups, rule changes, and the risk of being 'sybil attacked' or 'rug pulled', making them less rewarding in practice.

QWhy did the Yuanbao cash red packet campaign become so popular among crypto users in early February?

AIt became popular because it offered a simple, no-cost way to earn small cash rewards during a period of significant market downturn, providing psychological comfort and a temporary escape from heavy trading losses, as the crypto market experienced a major crash with billions liquidated.

QWhat example does the article use to illustrate the problem of being 'rug pulled' in a Web3 airdrop?

AThe article cites the example of a user who spent over $11,900 (including buying an NFT and participating in a public sale) on the Infinex project over 406-day period, only to end up with a significant financial loss at TGE, unable to even recoup their initial investment.

QAccording to the article, what is the fundamental difference in how Web2 and Web3 projects fund their user growth campaigns (airdrops)?

AWeb2 giants like Tencent use their strong cash flow to fund guaranteed cash rewards (like Yuanbao's 1.4 billion USD equivalent campaign), backed by legal constraints ensuring payout. Web3 projects, however, use token rewards which are merely a promise of future value that is often deferred, uncertain, and subject to various risks, making them less reliable.

QWhat key challenge do both Web2 and Web3 projects face after conducting a large airdrop campaign, as mentioned in the article?

ABoth face the challenge of user retention. While airdrops are effective for initial user acquisition and growth, long-term user retention depends on factors like product-market fit, user experience, and ecological utility, not just the initial incentive.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报44 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报44 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 год тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити ONE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Harmony (ONE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Harmony (ONE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Harmony (ONE)Після придбання Harmony (ONE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Harmony (ONE)Легко торгуйте Harmony (ONE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

428 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ONE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ONE (ONE).

活动图片