Adding Another Oracle, Polymarket's Ambition Exposed

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2026-04-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-03

Анотація

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, has announced the integration of Pyth Network as its oracle provider for settling prediction markets related to traditional assets. This new batch of markets will cover commodities like gold, silver, WTI crude oil, and natural gas, as well as U.S. stocks including NVIDIA, Apple, Tesla, and ETFs. Pyth will supply real-time pricing data via WebSocket, enabling second-by-second sampling and live charts for traders. This move is part of Polymarket’s ongoing expansion of its oracle infrastructure. Initially reliant on UMA’s optimistic oracle for subjective events like elections, the platform later integrated Chainlink for automated crypto price settlements (e.g., BTC and ETH). With Pyth—known for its institutional data sources like Jump Trading and Jane Street—Polymarket now extends into traditional finance, forming a multi-layered oracle system: UMA for social and political events, Chainlink for crypto, and Pyth for traditional assets. By expanding its data sources, Polymarket is broadening the scope of tradable futures—effectively turning real-world uncertainties into betable markets. The end goal appears to be a unified super-platform where any verifiable event—macro data, earnings, sports, weather, or AI releases—can be priced and traded.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

On the evening of April 2, prediction market leader Polymarket officially announced the integration of the oracle service Pyth Network, which will become the settlement data source for a new batch of traditional asset-related prediction events launched by Polymarket.

According to statements from Polymarket and Pyth Network, this batch of events will first cover commodities such as gold, silver, WTI crude oil, and natural gas, over a dozen U.S. stocks including NVIDIA, Apple, Tesla, Coinbase, Palantir, as well as major stock indices and some exchange-traded funds (ETFs) — for example, "Will gold rise or fall this hour?", "Will silver be above or below the target price by a certain time?"...

Pyth Network will provide real-time price data via WebSocket, and Polymarket will sample this data every second and publish it as real-time charts, allowing traders to continuously see the market's position relative to their own positions.

Mustafa Aljadery, Product Lead at Polymarket, stated in the announcement: "The outcome of predictions involving millions of dollars can often hinge on a single price point, so it is essential to ensure the absolute accuracy of the data source. Pyth Network provides this guarantee, enabling Polymarket to further expand into high-stakes financial markets."

Polymarket's Oracle Expansion

This is not the first time Polymarket has expanded its oracle services.

Polymarket initially relied primarily on UMA's Optimistic Oracle mechanism. UMA's logic is essentially a "social consensus oracle" — proposers submit results, challengers initiate disputes, and voters make the final ruling. This mechanism is particularly suitable for subjective, unstructured events without a single standard answer, such as political elections, policy changes, and social hot topics.

However, subjective judgments often also mean room for controversy. Historically, Polymarket has repeatedly sparked discussions within the community about manipulation risks and fairness due to settlement disputes with UMA.

In September 2025, when Polymarket began to heavily promote cryptocurrency price movement events, it urgently needed to introduce a more deterministic data source to reduce the possibility of human intervention. To this end, Polymarket chose to partner with Chainlink at that time. By combining the use of Chainlink Data Streams (responsible for providing low-latency, timestamped market prices) and Chainlink Automation (responsible for executing on-chain result settlements at preset times), the BTC, ETH, and other crypto asset price movement event markets on Polymarket could be settled automatically and quickly, while allowing users to view low-latency, verifiable prices of related assets in real-time.

In a sense, the integration with Chainlink was Polymarket's first step in extending its reach from "social consensus prediction" to "automated price judgment," but Polymarket's goals clearly extend beyond the cryptocurrency market.

Compared to Chainlink, Pyth Network's characteristic is that its data is provided directly by trading firms, exchanges, market makers, and banks worldwide. These institutions actively participate in pricing in global markets, and Pyth Pro obtains data from the highest quality data publishers in the network, including Jump Trading, Blue Ocean, LMAX, and Jane Street, among others. Perhaps considering its global market characteristics, Polymarket ultimately selected Pyth Network for the data source of traditional financial assets this time.

A Glimpse into Polymarket's Ambition

With the partnership with Pyth Network finalized, Polymarket has formed a clear multi-tiered oracle architecture:

  • UMA: Non-standard event layer, responsible for politics, society, breaking news, macro events;
  • Chainlink: Crypto asset layer, responsible for on-chain asset price feeds like BTC, ETH, and automated price settlement;
  • Pyth Network: Traditional finance layer, providing high-frequency price data for traditional assets like U.S. stocks, commodities, indices, sourced from institutions.

From UMA representing non-standard events, to Chainlink focused on the crypto-native market, and now Pyth Network specializing in global financial markets, each time Polymarket introduces a new oracle service, it pushes the platform into broader markets. The expansion of oracles is essentially the expansion of "tradable futures" — the more data sources, the more dimensions of the real world can be incorporated into the betting scope.

If this logic continues to develop, there is almost no upper limit to the markets Polymarket can incorporate in the future. Macroeconomic data, corporate earnings reports, sporting events, weather changes, and even AI model releases can be integrated through different oracles. As long as a verifiable data source exists, a corresponding market can be built. The uncertainties of the real world will be continuously broken down into bettable events.

From this perspective, Polymarket's endgame may be far more than just a simple prediction market; it could be a "future trading platform" covering all uncertainties. When all kinds of uncertain events can be uniformly incorporated into the same mechanism, everything becomes bettable, and everything becomes priced. Oracles are merely a technical expansion, but what they point to behind the scenes is an emerging, one-stop super platform that far exceeds everyone's estimates.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the latest oracle service integrated by Polymarket, and what type of assets does it cover?

APolymarket has integrated Pyth Network as its latest oracle service. It covers traditional assets such as gold, silver, WTI crude oil, natural gas, over a dozen U.S. stocks (including Nvidia, Apple, Tesla, Coinbase, Palantir), major stock indices, and some exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

QWhat was the primary oracle mechanism used by Polymarket in its early stages, and what type of events was it suitable for?

AIn its early stages, Polymarket primarily relied on UMA's Optimistic Oracle mechanism. This mechanism, based on social consensus, was suitable for subjective, non-structured events like political elections, policy changes, and social hot topics.

QWhy did Polymarket choose to integrate Chainlink's oracle service in 2025?

AIn 2025, Polymarket integrated Chainlink's oracle service to introduce a more deterministic data source for cryptocurrency price movement events. This was done to reduce the possibility of human intervention and enable automatic, fast settlement of markets for assets like BTC and ETH, with real-time, verifiable price data.

QWhat is the key characteristic of Pyth Network's data that likely influenced Polymarket's decision to partner with them for traditional financial assets?

APyth Network's data is provided directly by trading firms, exchanges, market makers, and banks (such as Jump Trading, Blue Ocean, LMAX, and Jane Street) that actively participate in pricing across global markets. Its global market characteristics made it a suitable choice for Polymarket's expansion into traditional financial assets.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential ultimate vision or 'endgame' for Polymarket as suggested by its multi-layered oracle architecture?

AThe article suggests that Polymarket's ultimate vision is to become a 'future trading platform' that covers all uncertainties. By expanding its oracle services, it aims to make virtually any real-world uncertainty with a verifiable data source—from macroeconomic data and sports events to weather changes and AI model releases—into a tradable market, creating a one-stop super platform for pricing and betting on the future.

Пов'язані матеріали

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手31 хв тому

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手31 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手54 хв тому

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手54 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片