‘Adapt or die’- SEC approves Nasdaq plan to trade tokenized securities

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-19

Анотація

The SEC has approved Nasdaq's pilot program to trade tokenized securities, allowing the exchange to test blockchain-based versions of stocks and ETFs on a unified platform. The program will initially include high-volume assets like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs. Unlike many existing tokenized products, Nasdaq’s tokens will grant holders the same legal rights as traditional shareholders, including the same CUSIP numbers and trading symbols. This move is seen as a major disruptive force in asset management, with experts comparing its potential impact to that of ETFs on mutual funds. The approval accelerates Nasdaq’s partnership with Kraken and aims to enable 24/7 trading and attract offshore investors. The tokenized securities market has already surpassed $1 billion, with significant growth in early 2026.

New York-based Nasdaq Exchange has gotten the green light to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities.

The SEC approval would allow the traditional exchange to test trading of the blockchain-based version of stocks under its Depository Trust Company (DTC) pilot program.

Both traditional stocks and these tokenized variants will trade on the same unified platform. The program will initially target high-volume ETFs and stocks.

This would include the constituents of the Russell 1000 Index (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, etc.). Additionally, ETFs such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100 will fall within the early asset scope.

Community reactions

For ETF analyst Nate Geraci, the SEC approval would set the stage for a massive disruption by the tokenization boom.

For him, the writing is on the wall: the top regulator, the SEC, major exchanges (Nasdaq, NYSE), and the world’s largest asset managers (BlackRock and Fidelity) are all in on tokenization.

He added,

Tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds...Will basically be adapt or die a slow death.

Nasdaq initially sought SEC approval for tokenized stocks in September 2025. But its proposal was wholly different from the current tokenized securities on the market, such as xStocks offered by Kraken and Backed Finance.

Unlike most current offerings, including leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq pushed for its tokenized securities to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. And the SEC acknowledged this.

A tokenized share of a DTC Eligible Security must be fungible with, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol with, and afford its shareholders the same rights and privileges as a share of an equivalent class of the traditional security for it to trade on Nasdaq.

Nasdaq’s tokenization plans

That said, the SEC’s green light will accelerate Nasdaq’s recent partnership with Kraken to distribute tokenized securities by xStocks.

This integration may likely be tied to the DTC pilot and eventually accord xStock holders similar legal rights as traditional shareholders.

The end goal? Ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market.

And the appetite for these products is incredible. So far, the tokenized segment has crossed $1B, and over $300 million of the market cap was added in Q1 2026 alone.

Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • The approval of Nasdaq’s tokenized securities trading is a major unfolding disruption that would force other traditional players to pivot, per an ETF expert.
  • SEC clarified that Nasdaq’s tokenized stocks and ETFs will offer similar rights as traditional securities.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's approval for Nasdaq's pilot program?

AThe SEC's approval allows Nasdaq to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities, which are blockchain-based versions of stocks. This program will enable both traditional stocks and their tokenized variants to trade on the same unified platform, initially targeting high-volume ETFs and stocks like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

QAccording to ETF analyst Nate Geraci, how disruptive will tokenization be to asset management?

ANate Geraci believes tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds. He stated that it will force traditional players to 'adapt or die a slow death,' indicating a significant transformation in the industry.

QHow do Nasdaq's tokenized securities differ from current offerings like xStocks from Kraken and Backed Finance?

AUnlike current offerings such as leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq's tokenized securities are designed to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. The SEC requires that tokenized shares must be fungible, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol, and afford shareholders the same rights and privileges as traditional securities.

QWhat is the end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans, as mentioned in the article?

AThe end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans is to ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market. This initiative aims to expand market accessibility and provide continuous trading opportunities.

QWhat is the current market size of the tokenized segment, and how much growth was seen in Q1 2026?

AThe tokenized segment has crossed $1 billion in market size. In Q1 2026 alone, over $300 million in market capitalization was added, indicating significant growth and appetite for these products.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报39 хв тому

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报39 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

Chinese tech giants like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent are accelerating the rollout of integrated AI model subscription services—dubbed “model supermarkets”—to provide developers with bundled access to multiple leading domestic large language models (LLMs). ByteDance’s Volcengine recently upgraded its "Coding Plan" by adding newer models like GLM-5.1, Minimax M2.7, and Kimi k2.6, allowing subscribers to use various top models under a single monthly fee starting at ¥40. However, user feedback reveals significant issues, including rapid consumption of usage limits (e.g., hitting caps within hours), frequent server errors (like HTTP 429), and slow response times during peak hours. Complaints about misleading deduction rates—where calls to advanced models consume more quota—are also common. The trend is industry-wide: Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all launched similar multi-model coding plans. While these platforms reduce trial costs for developers, they also expose challenges in balancing affordability with service quality and computational stability. Amid this shift, independent AI companies like Zhipu, MiniMax, and Moonlight Face (Kimi) are developing strategies to avoid becoming mere “pipes” in this ecosystem—focusing on vertical applications, autonomous agents, and long-context models to retain competitiveness. Analysts suggest that, while platform aggregation may pressure model firms in the short term, specialized and vertical AI capabilities will remain differentiated in the long run.

marsbit43 хв тому

More and More 'Model Supermarkets' Are Opening: ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent Compete to Integrate

marsbit43 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片