‘Adapt or die’- SEC approves Nasdaq plan to trade tokenized securities

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-19

Анотація

The SEC has approved Nasdaq's pilot program to trade tokenized securities, allowing the exchange to test blockchain-based versions of stocks and ETFs on a unified platform. The program will initially include high-volume assets like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs. Unlike many existing tokenized products, Nasdaq’s tokens will grant holders the same legal rights as traditional shareholders, including the same CUSIP numbers and trading symbols. This move is seen as a major disruptive force in asset management, with experts comparing its potential impact to that of ETFs on mutual funds. The approval accelerates Nasdaq’s partnership with Kraken and aims to enable 24/7 trading and attract offshore investors. The tokenized securities market has already surpassed $1 billion, with significant growth in early 2026.

New York-based Nasdaq Exchange has gotten the green light to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities.

The SEC approval would allow the traditional exchange to test trading of the blockchain-based version of stocks under its Depository Trust Company (DTC) pilot program.

Both traditional stocks and these tokenized variants will trade on the same unified platform. The program will initially target high-volume ETFs and stocks.

This would include the constituents of the Russell 1000 Index (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, etc.). Additionally, ETFs such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100 will fall within the early asset scope.

Community reactions

For ETF analyst Nate Geraci, the SEC approval would set the stage for a massive disruption by the tokenization boom.

For him, the writing is on the wall: the top regulator, the SEC, major exchanges (Nasdaq, NYSE), and the world’s largest asset managers (BlackRock and Fidelity) are all in on tokenization.

He added,

Tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds...Will basically be adapt or die a slow death.

Nasdaq initially sought SEC approval for tokenized stocks in September 2025. But its proposal was wholly different from the current tokenized securities on the market, such as xStocks offered by Kraken and Backed Finance.

Unlike most current offerings, including leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq pushed for its tokenized securities to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. And the SEC acknowledged this.

A tokenized share of a DTC Eligible Security must be fungible with, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol with, and afford its shareholders the same rights and privileges as a share of an equivalent class of the traditional security for it to trade on Nasdaq.

Nasdaq’s tokenization plans

That said, the SEC’s green light will accelerate Nasdaq’s recent partnership with Kraken to distribute tokenized securities by xStocks.

This integration may likely be tied to the DTC pilot and eventually accord xStock holders similar legal rights as traditional shareholders.

The end goal? Ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market.

And the appetite for these products is incredible. So far, the tokenized segment has crossed $1B, and over $300 million of the market cap was added in Q1 2026 alone.

Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • The approval of Nasdaq’s tokenized securities trading is a major unfolding disruption that would force other traditional players to pivot, per an ETF expert.
  • SEC clarified that Nasdaq’s tokenized stocks and ETFs will offer similar rights as traditional securities.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's approval for Nasdaq's pilot program?

AThe SEC's approval allows Nasdaq to proceed with its pilot program for trading tokenized securities, which are blockchain-based versions of stocks. This program will enable both traditional stocks and their tokenized variants to trade on the same unified platform, initially targeting high-volume ETFs and stocks like those in the Russell 1000 Index and major ETFs such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

QAccording to ETF analyst Nate Geraci, how disruptive will tokenization be to asset management?

ANate Geraci believes tokenization will be as disruptive to asset management as ETFs were to mutual funds. He stated that it will force traditional players to 'adapt or die a slow death,' indicating a significant transformation in the industry.

QHow do Nasdaq's tokenized securities differ from current offerings like xStocks from Kraken and Backed Finance?

AUnlike current offerings such as leveraged derivatives that grant holders no legal rights, Nasdaq's tokenized securities are designed to have rights similar to those of investors holding traditional shares. The SEC requires that tokenized shares must be fungible, share the same CUSIP number and trading symbol, and afford shareholders the same rights and privileges as traditional securities.

QWhat is the end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans, as mentioned in the article?

AThe end goal of Nasdaq's tokenization plans is to ensure 24/7 trading and target large offshore users to gain access to the U.S. equity market. This initiative aims to expand market accessibility and provide continuous trading opportunities.

QWhat is the current market size of the tokenized segment, and how much growth was seen in Q1 2026?

AThe tokenized segment has crossed $1 billion in market size. In Q1 2026 alone, over $300 million in market capitalization was added, indicating significant growth and appetite for these products.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit27 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit27 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit47 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit47 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit55 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit55 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片