Aave whales scoop 8% of supply amid sell-off – A move to $210 possible IF…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-11

Анотація

Amid a governance crisis that caused a 20% price drop to $143, Aave's largest holders (whales) seized the opportunity to accumulate, increasing their holdings to control 80% of the total supply. The top 100 addresses now hold 12.92 million AAVE, adding approximately 8% of the supply during the sell-off. Whale wallets with over $1 million surged by 66%, indicating strong demand from large investors while retail exited. Concurrently, selling pressure on exchanges declined from a peak of 1.43 million tokens to 1.31 million. For a price recovery to occur, bulls must reclaim the $174 resistance level. Success could lead to a 30% rally toward $210, but losing the $160 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and potentially push the price back to $140.

The recent Aave governance drama presented smart money with a perfect opportunity to scale exposure to the DeFi platform at a discounted rate. AAVE dumped 20% to lows of $143 and wiped out over $500 million from the altcoin’s market.

However, during the chaos, the Top 100 Addresses increased their holdings to 12.92 million AAVE, adding approximately 8% of the total supply.

Now the Top 100 Addresses control 80% of the overall AAVE supply.

Whales or large holders also increased by 66% over the same period between early and late December. The whale wallets with holdings of over $1 million surged from 120k to 200k, underscoring massive whale demand as other retail investors backed out during the governance drama.

But most importantly, the selling pressure across exchanges also declined substantially.

AAVE selling pressure declines

Santiment data showed that during the peak of the Aave Labs-DAO drama and the Christmas week voting period, AAVE tokens on exchanges surged from 1.22 million to 1.43 million coins.

This resulted in a surge in selling pressure, coinciding with the sharp decline from $182 to $143.

However, the selling pressure eased to 1.31 million AAVE at the time of writing as tracked by Supply on Exchanges (red).

Worth pointing out that the selling pressure also eased after Aave Labs and Aave founder Stani Kulechov promised to share non-protocol revenue with tokenholders.

Although the hostilities were de-escalated, the drama is not yet over unless the different factions finalize negotiations in a binding and enforceable agreement.

That said, the derivatives market demand remained flat at around $130-$150 million in Open Interest, the same level seen during the muted market in Q4 2025.

AAVE could rally 30% if...

On the price charts, AAVE bulls have attempted to reclaim the 50-day Moving Average ($174) for the second time since December. Although they failed again, a successful reclaim would reinforce a bullish market structure shift and potentially lead to a sustainable recovery.

As such, consolidation between $160 and $174 could allow bulls to regroup and attempt another push at the crucial level. Should they clear the hurdle, a potential 30% upside to $210-$220 could be likely.

However, losing the $160 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and likely drag the altcoin back down to $140 again.

Final Thoughts

AAVE has recorded massive whale interest and aggressive bidding from smart money.
Overall selling pressure also tapered and could allow a potential recovery, but only if $160 support holds.

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані питання

QWhat percentage of the total AAVE supply do the Top 100 Addresses now control after the recent buying activity?

AThe Top 100 Addresses now control 80% of the overall AAVE supply.

QWhat was the key factor that eased the selling pressure on AAVE after the governance drama?

AThe selling pressure eased after Aave Labs and Aave founder Stani Kulechov promised to share non-protocol revenue with tokenholders.

QWhat is the crucial price level that AAVE bulls need to reclaim to signal a potential bullish market structure shift?

AAAVE bulls need to successfully reclaim the 50-day Moving Average, which is at $174, to signal a potential bullish market structure shift.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential price target for AAVE if it successfully reclaims the $174 level?

AIf AAVE price successfully reclaims the $174 level, a potential 30% upside to $210-$220 could be likely.

QWhat would invalidate the bullish outlook for AAVE's price according to the technical analysis?

ALosing the $160 support level would invalidate the bullish outlook and could drag the price back down to $140.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit4 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit4 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни MOVE (MOVE).