a16z Crypto Operating Partner: Wall Street Is Undergoing Its Biggest Infrastructure Upgrade in 30 Years

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-26Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-26

Анотація

Wall Street is undergoing its largest infrastructure upgrade in 30 years by migrating to on-chain systems, moving beyond mere blockchain exploration. This shift is driven by the promise of significantly faster capital movement, similar to the electronic trading revolution of the 1990s which reduced costs, expanded participation, and increased market size. Tokenization—digital representations of real-world assets like Treasuries and stocks on blockchain—enables 24/7 markets, instant settlement, fractional ownership, and global accessibility. Major institutions are already adopting this: DTCC plans to tokenize U.S. Treasuries by 2026, NYSE is launching a platform for on-chain stock trading, and Tradeweb has executed real-time blockchain-based Treasury trades. The current financial system’s inefficiencies—high fees, slow settlement, and intermediary dependencies—create opportunities for disruption. Smart contracts and atomic settlement eliminate these frictions, turning existing profit margins into avenues for innovation. Regulatory clarity, such as the CLARITY Act, is further accelerating this transition. Established institutions are not competitors but potential customers for new infrastructure products. Founders have a window to build the next generation of financial services atop this emerging regulated, institutional-grade framework. The outcome will be a larger, more liquid, and accessible global market.

Author: Jason Rosenthal, a16z Operating Partner

Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher

Wall Street is no longer just exploring blockchain; it is migrating to it.

For years, the institutions that form the backbone of global capital markets—exchanges, clearinghouses, and electronic trading platforms—have been watching from the sidelines. Now, they are moving on-chain.

What is happening now is the largest infrastructure upgrade in capital markets since the rise of electronic trading thirty years ago.

But most people won't realize it until the transformation is complete.

Why the Shift Now: Speed Changes Everything

All institutions moving in this direction share one core belief—on-chain infrastructure will significantly increase the velocity of capital. History has clearly demonstrated this.

Think back to the development of electronic trading in the 1990s: before Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs) and online brokers emerged, a single trade could take minutes to complete, spreads were quoted in fractions, and access was restricted by geography and capital. Then, the infrastructure changed. Spreads narrowed dramatically. Commissions dropped from $150 to $9.95, and eventually to zero. Trading volume exploded. Retail participation surged. The markets of the 2000s were fundamentally different from those of the 1990s—not just cheaper, but larger.

Tokenization applies this same logic to the entire global financial system: 24/7 markets, instant settlement, seamless cross-border distribution, fractionalization of assets previously locked behind six-figure minimums, real-time collateral movement instead of overnight idleness. Higher transaction velocity. Broader participation. A larger market overall.

But what exactly does tokenization mean? A tokenized asset is a digital representation of a real-world asset (RWA)—such as a treasury bond, Apple stock, or a real estate deed—recorded on a blockchain as a programmable token. Unlike the past, where custodians tracked ownership in centralized databases during specific time zone business hours, tokenized assets exist on-chain: transferable, programmable, and capable of instant settlement globally, at any time.

It is not a derivative; it is the actual asset—but with a superior underlying architecture.

Institutions are already taking action.

In December 2025, DTCC received a no-action letter from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), authorizing it to tokenize real-world assets on approved blockchains. DTCC processed $3.7 quadrillion in transactions in 2024. Its current goal is to launch a tokenized U.S. Treasury service in the first half of 2026.

On January 19, 2026, the New York Stock Exchange announced a platform for 24/7 on-chain trading and settlement of U.S. stocks and ETFs—including fractional shares, instant settlement, and stablecoin financing—in partnership with Bank of New York (BNY) and Citi Group, supported by tokenized deposits from ICE Clear Credit. The world's most iconic stock exchange is moving on-chain.

In August 2025, Tradeweb completed the first real-time, fully on-chain financing of a U.S. Treasury with USDC as consideration—this trade was executed on a Saturday, bypassing traditional settlement windows, with participants including Bank of America, Citadel Securities, DTCC, and Virtu Financial. Since then, this financing model has expanded quarterly and now includes cross-border and intraday settlement. Nasdaq submitted its proposed rule change to the SEC in September 2025.

This looks increasingly like a migration, not a series of isolated experiments.

The Hidden Costs in the Current System

A second factor driving this shift: the existing market is built around intermediaries, not the market itself.

Consider a typical securities trade: a trader pays a spread to a broker. In institutional trades, a prime broker charges financing fees. Exchanges and transfer agents take commissions. Custodians charge safekeeping fees. DTCC levies fees for clearing, netting, and settlement. Even with the U.S. finally achieving T+1 settlement in 2024—a reform decades in the making, as it previously took days—capital is still locked up overnight, effectively a "structural tax" on all participants.

Smart contracts and atomic settlement break this logjam. Now, counterparties can transact immediately on-chain with finality.

The profit margins in the existing system—their take rate—haven't disappeared... they've become the opportunity for new entrants. In other words, their margin is your opportunity to build the new system.

***

The final breakthrough is regulatory clarity—and this process has finally begun. If the current momentum holds, the CLARITY Act's impact on TradFi will mirror what the Genius Act achieved for the adoption and acceleration of stablecoins.

The safeguards large institutions require are taking shape. So, what does this mean for builders?

The migration of global financial infrastructure on-chain will create demand for entirely new categories of products and services.

The fastest-moving incumbents are not your competitors—they are your customers. DTCC doesn't want to build middleware. The New York Stock Exchange doesn't want to build compliance tools. Tradeweb doesn't want to build a cross-border distribution layer.

These companies are building regulated, institutional-grade infrastructure. Founders are responsible for building all the products that run on top of it.

This is exactly the same pattern as the 1990s. The exchanges didn't build E*TRADE. They didn't build the Bloomberg terminal. They didn't build the order management systems and prime brokerage platforms that defined the next era. Those platforms were built by founders who saw the future coming.

More participants, faster velocity, lower friction.

Higher liquidity, larger markets.

History has made it abundantly clear where this ultimately leads.

The window to build the infrastructure for tokenized financial markets is open. Seize the moment, and build steadily.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main argument made by the a16z Crypto operating partner regarding Wall Street's infrastructure upgrade?

AThe a16z Crypto operating partner argues that Wall Street is undergoing its largest infrastructure upgrade in 30 years, with major financial institutions migrating to on-chain infrastructure rather than just exploring blockchain technology.

QHow does tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) improve financial markets according to the article?

ATokenization enables 24/7 markets, instant settlement, seamless cross-border distribution, fractional ownership of previously high-minimum assets, real-time collateral movement, higher transaction speeds, broader participation, and ultimately larger market size.

QWhich major financial institutions are mentioned as actively moving towards on-chain infrastructure?

AThe article mentions DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Tradeweb, Nasdaq, ICE Clear Credit, Bank of New York (BNY), and Citi Group as institutions actively adopting or developing on-chain infrastructure.

QWhat historical analogy does the author draw to explain the significance of the current shift to blockchain?

AThe author compares the current shift to blockchain to the rise of electronic trading in the 1990s, which dramatically reduced costs (commissions dropped from $150 to zero), tightened spreads, increased trading volume, and expanded retail participation.

QWhat opportunity does the article suggest for founders and builders in this new financial infrastructure shift?

AThe article suggests that founders should build products and services that run on top of the new regulated, institutional-grade on-chain infrastructure being built by established companies, similar to how E*TRADE and Bloomberg Terminal were built on top of electronic trading infrastructure in the 1990s.

Пов'язані матеріали

STRC Major De-pegging's First Financial Report, How Will Strategy Repair Its Capital Flywheel?

Bitcoin treasury company Strategy released its Q2 2026 earnings report on July 31. Despite a 6.9% year-over-year revenue increase to $122 million, the company recorded a net loss of $8.22 billion, largely due to $8.32 billion in unrealized losses from Bitcoin price fluctuations. As of quarter-end, Strategy holds 843,775 BTC with an average cost of $75,000 per coin, and Bitcoin per share increased. The report highlights a critical shift in Strategy's capital model following the de-pegging of its key financing tool, STRC (Strategic Coin), which fell below its $100 target. Management's top priority is restoring STRC to its target value, aiming for a recovery by September 8. They rule out discounted STRC issuances and plan to maintain its dividend yield at 12%, instead focusing on bolstering its $3.75 billion cash reserve. Strategy has moved from a one-way "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin strategy to active capital management. This new approach, part of its "Digital Credit Capital Framework," involves flexibly managing its balance sheet across four elements: BTC, USD cash, common stock (MSTR), and digital credit securities like STRC. This allows for BTC monetization (having sold $218.4 million in BTC so far), strategic repurchases of discounted securities, and debt optimization, as seen with a $1.5 billion convertible bond buyback. The company's future hinges on two key tests: successfully re-pegging STRC to restore market confidence in its digital credit system, and a long-term recovery in Bitcoin's price to ultimately support its growth thesis.

marsbit3 хв тому

STRC Major De-pegging's First Financial Report, How Will Strategy Repair Its Capital Flywheel?

marsbit3 хв тому

STRC's First Financial Report Post-Depegging, How is Strategy Restoring the Capital Flywheel?

On July 31, 2026, Bitcoin treasury company Strategy released its Q2 financial report. Despite a 6.9% year-over-year increase in revenue to $122 million, the company recorded a substantial net loss of $8.22 billion, primarily due to $8.32 billion in unrealized losses from Bitcoin holdings. While Strategy's core Bitcoin strategy remains intact—its holdings grew 11% to 843,775 BTC—the company is undergoing a fundamental shift in its capital model. Following the de-pegging of its key financing tool, the STRCoin (STRC), from its $100 target in May, Strategy has pivoted from a one-directional "raise funds, buy Bitcoin" cycle to a more dynamic, multi-asset capital management approach. A key part of this new framework is the "Monetization Program," through which Strategy has sold approximately $218.4 million worth of BTC to bolster liquidity. The company's top priority is repairing STRC's peg, committing not to issue discounted shares until it returns to its target range. It has initiated a $1 billion buyback program for discounted digital credit securities, having repurchased $28.9 million face value of STRC so far. Management aims to restore the peg around September 8, 2026. Strategy now actively manages a matrix of assets: Bitcoin (for accumulation or strategic sales), USD cash reserves (now at $3.75 billion), common stock (MSTR), and digital credit securities like STRC. This allows for tactical moves like repurchasing discounted debt or equity to capture value. The future success of Strategy's "capital flywheel" hinges on two factors: the short-term ability to successfully re-peg STRC to restore market confidence in its digital credit system, and the long-term price trajectory of Bitcoin, upon which its entire investment thesis ultimately depends.

Odaily星球日报8 хв тому

STRC's First Financial Report Post-Depegging, How is Strategy Restoring the Capital Flywheel?

Odaily星球日报8 хв тому

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

Coinbase posted its second consecutive quarterly net loss of $359 million on $1.22 billion in revenue for Q2, highlighting its vulnerability to crypto market cycles where weaker prices and lower volatility reduce user trading. However, the report also reveals a strategic shift in its business model. Despite a 25% quarter-over-quarter decline in global spot trading volume, Coinbase increased its market share to a company-record 10.3%. This suggests its position as a compliant U.S. on-ramp is strengthening even in a cooler market. A key development is the diversification of revenue streams. Transaction revenue fell to $599 million, nearly equaling subscription and services revenue of $555 million. Stablecoin services, generating $292 million, are becoming a crucial revenue "floor." This income, derived from interest on the $20 billion average USDC balance held on its platform, is less tied to daily trading activity. Furthermore, while spot trading volume dropped significantly, derivatives volume held steady at $1.03 trillion. Coinbase is pushing to integrate spot, stablecoin, and derivatives liquidity to create a more interconnected and sticky ecosystem for users. The GAAP net loss includes non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation and crypto asset valuation changes. Its adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $208 million for the 14th straight quarter, indicating core operations can cover ongoing costs. The company is also reducing expenses to manage the downturn. The central question moving forward is whether Coinbase's growing market share, stablecoin revenues, and expanding product integration can sufficiently offset the inherent cyclicality of its core trading business during future market contractions.

marsbit23 хв тому

With Two Consecutive Quarters of Losses, Coinbase Must Rely on Paths Beyond Trading

marsbit23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片