a16z Crypto Fund Shrinks by 55% but Still Raising Capital; As Paradigm Shifts to AI, Who Will Guard Web3?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-05

Анотація

a16z crypto, the blockchain-focused arm of Andreessen Horowitz, is raising its fifth fund targeting approximately $2 billion, according to Fortune. This is significantly less than its 2022 fund of $4.5 billion. Led by Chris Dixon, a16z crypto remains fully committed to blockchain investments, even as the market has cooled from recent highs and some major players are diversifying. In contrast, other prominent crypto VCs are shifting focus. Paradigm is reportedly raising a new fund that will include AI and robotics, and Multicoin Capital's co-founder has left to explore other tech sectors. Despite this industry divergence, a16z continues to invest based on Dixon's "read, write, own" philosophy, which posits blockchain as the foundation for a decentralized internet. While some of its high-profile bets, like the decentralized social media project Farcaster, have struggled, a16z maintains that the current "financial era" of crypto is a necessary foundational phase. The firm has recently invested in projects like Bitcoin staking protocol Babylon, prediction market tool Kairos, and Solana staking protocol Jito.

Author: Fortune

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: The biggest player in crypto VC is launching a new fundraising round at a time when Bitcoin has halved from its recent high. The scale has shrunk to less than half of the 2022 fund. More notably, the industry ecosystem is diverging: Paradigm is pivoting to AI and robotics, Multicoin's founder has departed, while a16z remains 100% committed to blockchain—the outcome of this bet will define who calls the shots in the next crypto cycle.

Full Text Below:

The biggest player in crypto venture capital is back on the fundraising circuit. According to multiple anonymous sources who spoke to Fortune, Andreessen Horowitz's blockchain division, a16z crypto, is currently raising its fifth fund, targeting approximately $2 billion, with plans to complete the raise by the first half of 2026.

a16z crypto, led by veteran investor and entrepreneur Chris Dixon, launched its first $300 million fund in 2018, the year after the blockchain boom pushed Bitcoin to $20,000. Each subsequent fund has been larger than the last, culminating in the $4.5 billion mega-fund in 2022—which is still actively investing. Although the latest fund is less than half that size, one source indicated that a16z crypto plans to shorten the fundraising cycle to capitalize on rapidly changing crypto trends. Previous funds were spaced one to two years apart. (a16z crypto CMO Kim Milosevich declined to comment.)

This venture giant's fifth foray into digital assets comes at a time of sluggish crypto market performance, despite recent rebounds. Bitcoin has fallen nearly 50% since hitting an all-time high in October, and shares of publicly traded crypto companies have also declined significantly. Nevertheless, the industry is enjoying the most lenient regulatory environment in Washington in its 17-year history.

Read, write, own

When a16z launched its first crypto fund, digital assets were still novel to traditional investors. But the venture capital firm and Dixon brought institutional capital into the space, prompting other major players to follow, including Paradigm and Haun Ventures, founded by a former a16z crypto general partner. Fortune reported last year that Haun is raising $1 billion through two new funds.

a16z crypto has backed several winners, including crypto financial services firm Anchorage, prediction market platform Kalshi, and decentralized exchange Uniswap. However, other digital asset investors have questioned Dixon's philosophy—summarized in his 2024 book, *Read Write Own*. Dixon has been a proponent of the "Web3" narrative, arguing that blockchain can create decentralized versions of internet applications and underlying infrastructure, from social media platforms to lending protocols.

Yet many of these projects have since faded, including a16z-backed Farcaster—a project building a decentralized Twitter—which decided to return the full $180 million it raised to investors earlier this year after selling its infrastructure to another company.

Meanwhile, the crypto industry has largely shifted toward purely financial projects centered around stablecoins and tokenization, or offering blockchain-wrapped versions of other financial assets. Even staunch crypto investors are pivoting. Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani left the firm in February, stating he would focus on other areas of technology. According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, crypto VC Paradigm, founded by Sequoia and Coinbase alumni, is raising up to $1.5 billion for a new fund that will focus not only on crypto but also on AI and robotics. A Paradigm spokesperson declined to comment.

According to a source familiar with the matter who spoke to Fortune, a16z crypto's fifth fund will be 100% focused on blockchain investments.

Dixon recently acknowledged on X that blockchain has entered its "financial era" but refuted claims that the "read write own" philosophy has failed. "Finance isn't outside the larger narrative; it's part of it," Dixon wrote. "It's the foundation and proving ground for everything else."

During the fundraising period, a16z crypto continues to make investments. Recent examples include: Babylon, a decentralized protocol that helps users use Bitcoin positions as collateral; Kairos, a cross-platform integration tool for prediction markets; and a $50 million investment in Solana staking protocol Jito.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the target size of a16z crypto's fifth fund and how does it compare to their 2022 fund?

AThe target size for a16z crypto's fifth fund is approximately $2 billion, which is less than half of their 2022 fund, which was a $4.5 billion mega-fund.

QAccording to the article, what is the current focus of the broader crypto industry, and how does it differ from a16z's 'Web3' philosophy?

AThe broader crypto industry has largely shifted towards purely financial projects centered around stablecoins and tokenization, or offering blockchain-wrapped versions of other financial assets. This differs from a16z's 'Web3' philosophy, as championed by Chris Dixon, which advocates for using blockchain to create decentralized versions of internet applications and underlying infrastructure.

QWhich other major crypto VC firms are mentioned as shifting their investment focus away from being crypto-exclusive?

AThe article mentions that Paradigm is raising a new fund that will focus not only on crypto but also on AI and robotics. It also notes that Multicoin Capital's co-founder left to focus on other sectors in technology.

QWhat reason did Chris Dixon give for the crypto industry's current 'financial era' in relation to his broader 'read, write, own' philosophy?

AChris Dixon argued that finance is not separate from the broader narrative but is a part of it. He stated, 'Finance is not outside the broader narrative; it is part of it. It is the foundation and proving ground for everything else.'

QName one recent investment made by a16z crypto that is mentioned in the article.

AOne recent investment mentioned is a $50 million investment in Jito, a Solana staking protocol. Other recent investments include the decentralized protocol Babylon and the cross-platform prediction market integrator Kairos.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbit5 хв тому

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbit5 хв тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbit1 год тому

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit1 год тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片