a16z Crypto Founder on Stablecoins: The 'WhatsApp Moment' in Money Has Arrived

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-02-15Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-15

Анотація

Chris Dixon, general partner at a16z Crypto, argues that stablecoins are bringing about a "WhatsApp moment" for money—dramatically reducing the cost and increasing the speed of global payments, much like messaging apps did for communication. Last year, stablecoin transaction volume reached over $12 trillion, nearing Visa’s $17 trillion, but at a fraction of the cost. Stablecoins, which are pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, are becoming mainstream for online and international payments. They offer near-instant settlement, high reliability, and programmability, effectively turning money into software. While adoption is still largely within crypto-native and global business contexts, integration with traditional finance is accelerating. U.S. policy developments, such as the proposed Clarity Act, could provide the regulatory framework needed for stablecoins to scale as part of global financial infrastructure. Major companies like Stripe, Fidelity, and SpaceX are already using or issuing stablecoins to cut costs, streamline cross-border payroll, and operate in regions with weak banking systems. A significant secondary effect is the strengthening of the U.S. dollar’s dominance. Stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether now hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, making them top holders. If growth continues, they could rank among the top 10 Treasury holders by next year. Ultimately, stablecoins are reshaping global finance by enabling borderless value tr...

Article Author: Chris Dixon

Article Translation: Block Unicorn

Chris Dixon is a General Partner at a16z, leading its crypto investment division

The internet globalized information, and cryptocurrency is having a similar effect on money. Although recent headlines may focus on Bitcoin's price, a deeper and more lasting transformation is underway in the digital payments space. This year, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to assets like the US dollar—are gradually becoming a mainstream choice for online and international payments.

Call it the "WhatsApp moment" for money. Just as messaging apps like WhatsApp reduced the cost of international texting from around 30 cents per message to zero, stablecoins are doing the same for financial transactions. The data confirms this: last year, after excluding bot and other non-rational trading, stablecoin transaction volume exceeded $12 trillion—approaching Visa's $17 trillion in volume for the same period, but at a much lower cost.

In the process, stablecoins are bringing the original open and interoperable vision of the internet to finance. Given that blockchain technology allows stablecoins to be programmed, money is effectively becoming software.

While most stablecoin transactions currently come from "crypto-native" and global commercial activities rather than everyday consumer spending, this is changing. As more improvements are introduced, such as integration with more traditional financial partners to make user transactions easier, mass adoption of stablecoins will follow.

People around the world using stablecoins for transactions will hardly notice they are using stablecoins. Most will think they are simply using US dollars. And that is indeed the case, as the distinction between stablecoins and dollars has become very abstract for end users. Since each token is backed by one dollar or equivalent assets, the name itself doesn't matter. What matters is that the product is more reliable than any previous payment technology, almost free, and settles much faster—almost instantly.

Stablecoins also demonstrate the infinite possibilities when policy and technology align. Last year's "Genius Act" established clear rules for US stablecoins. More importantly, Congress is currently reviewing the "Clarity Act," which aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins. The Clarity Act will help determine whether these networks can scale to become part of global financial infrastructure or will stagnate. When challengers are given a level playing field and space to innovate, markets work their magic. It was this magic that enabled the internet to triumph over incumbents; it was this magic that allowed the US to dominate the internet; and it is this magic that will enable stablecoins to surpass today's payment systems.

Businesses are already recognizing the advantages of stablecoins. Some of the world's largest tech companies, banks, and retailers are actively promoting the use of stablecoins, or, like Fidelity Investments, have already issued their own. Payment giant Stripe has acquired several cryptocurrency companies over the past year or so and now supports stablecoins at checkout, instantly reducing payment processing fees from about 3% to 1.5%, with plenty of room for further reduction. SpaceX uses stablecoins to move funds from countries like Argentina and Nigeria, where local banking systems are fragile or capital controls are strict. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees faster. Ultimately, the internet could transform into an open marketplace where machine-to-machine transactions thrive, and AI agents conduct trades and settlements on behalf of users in real time.

The adoption of stablecoins also has an often-underestimated second-order effect: these tokens solidify the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world, thereby creating strong new demand for US Treasury bonds. Leading stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether currently hold nearly $140 billion in short-term US government bonds directly, making them among the top 20 holders of US Treasuries today. If stablecoin adoption continues to grow at its current rate, their holdings could jump into the top 10 by next year. (Citi Research even predicts that by 2030, stablecoin holdings of US Treasuries could surpass those of foreign governments and commercial banks.)

This is not just about payments; it's about reshaping the global financial landscape. The internet gave us borderless communication; stablecoins give us borderless value transfer. With clear rules and a sound market structure, they can become the pipes and pillars of a new financial system.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat does Chris Dixon refer to as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money, and why?

AChris Dixon refers to the rise of stablecoins as the 'WhatsApp moment' for money because, similar to how WhatsApp reduced the cost of international messaging to nearly zero, stablecoins are drastically reducing the cost of financial transactions, making them cheaper, faster, and more accessible for online and international payments.

QHow does the transaction volume of stablecoins compare to Visa, and what is a key advantage of stablecoins mentioned?

ALast year, stablecoins processed over $12 trillion in transactions (excluding non-rational trades like bots), which is approaching Visa's $17 trillion volume. A key advantage is that stablecoin transactions are significantly cheaper and settle almost instantly.

QWhat two U.S. legislative acts are mentioned in relation to stablecoins, and what is their purpose?

AThe two acts are the 'Genius Act' and the 'Clarity Act'. The Genius Act established clear rules for stablecoins in the U.S., while the Clarity Act, currently under consideration, aims to regulate the broader blockchain networks and digital asset ecosystems that underpin stablecoins to determine if they can scale as part of global financial infrastructure.

QHow do stablecoins benefit the U.S. Treasury and its global financial standing, according to the article?

AStablecoins consolidate the dollar's dominance in a multipolar world by creating strong new demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. Leading issuers like Circle and Tether hold nearly $140 billion in short-term U.S. government bonds, making them top-20 holders. This demand is projected to grow, potentially making them a top-10 holder by next year.

QName two specific ways companies are already leveraging stablecoins for business operations.

A1. Companies like SpaceX use stablecoins to move funds from countries with fragile banking systems or strict capital controls (e.g., Argentina, Nigeria). 2. Some companies use stablecoins to pay their global employees more quickly. Additionally, Stripe uses them to lower payment processing fees from ~3% to ~1.5% at checkout.

Пов'язані матеріали

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

While HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, surges to new all-time highs above $76 and attracts significant institutional ETF inflows, a starkly different reality unfolds within its HyperEVM application layer. Multiple core DeFi protocols across lending, NFTs, stablecoins, and DEXs have announced shutdowns between May and June. The article argues HYPE functions more like an "application stock" than a traditional ecosystem token. Its value is anchored to the trading fees from Hyperliquid's core perpetual contracts platform (HyperCore), which boasts a diversified revenue stream from crypto, commodities, and indices. Approximately 97% of protocol fees fund buybacks and burns of HYPE. This means HYPE's price is largely decoupled from the health of projects built on HyperEVM. The closures of significant projects like lending protocol HypurrFi (peak TVL >$300M) and NFT marketplace Drip.Trade highlight a structural tension. Hyperliquid's minimalist philosophy offers infrastructure without official grants, liquidity support, or marketing coordination for HyperEVM projects. This forces protocols into a fiercely competitive environment from day one. Furthermore, the success of HyperCore creates a liquidity vacuum, and mechanisms like HIP-3 (allowing direct perpetual market deployment) divert user attention and capital away from application-layer projects. The stronger the core perpetual trading business becomes, the more difficult it is for peripheral "DeFi lego" projects to survive and capture value, despite the flagship token's rising price.

Foresight News8 хв тому

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

Foresight News8 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbit19 хв тому

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbit19 хв тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit1 год тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1 год тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片