The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-31Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-31

Анотація

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

Two economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) believe that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race will not be the country that develops the most powerful model, but the one that manages to establish the currency on which these models and their accompanying infrastructure are based.

Chancxu Fu and Xiago Huang recently suggested that the strengthening of an economic cycle, where the energy for AI data centers, AI infrastructure, and the very cost of using AI are valued in US dollars, could lead to an increase in the dominance of the US dollar through stablecoins.

The thesis underlying this premise is simple: if companies have to pay for everything AI-related in dollars, and AI becomes a much larger industry than today in terms of monetary turnover and significance, there will be a renewed sharp increase in global demand for dollar liquidity. The authors define this factor as the first channel of dollar dominance in AI.

The second channel is related to the use of a specific currency that will facilitate payments involving agents; such payments could become ubiquitous if AI, as many in the crypto industry believe, consistently displaces human-managed systems in logistics, inventory management, and treasury operations. "In particular, dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements necessary for agent-based commerce," they explain.

These two channels can intersect, as agent systems could execute settlements for AI-related computational payments in stablecoins, creating a positive dollar loop, from which it is difficult to break free.

Although stablecoins are not the only available substitute for the dollar, they could benefit from early network effects, as they are already ready to play this role in the AI economy, while tokenized deposits of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are not yet ready for this task.

This would have a side effect that would also benefit the US: increased demand for US Treasury bonds used as collateral to support the growing market capitalization of stablecoins.

The report calls on ASEAN+3 countries, including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Japan, and South Korea, to limit their dependence on this "dollar loop."

Creating regional data centers and developing tokenized forms of money based on local currencies could help avoid strengthening the link between stablecoins and AI, as well as help these countries participate in the AI economy without indirectly supporting a new level of dependence on AI.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the AMRO economists, what determines the winner in the AI race?

AThe winner in the AI race will not be the country that develops the most powerful model, but the one that manages to establish the currency on which these models and their accompanying infrastructure are based.

QWhat are the two channels through which AI could reinforce US dollar dominance, as described by Chengxu Fu and Xiago Huang?

A1. The first channel is the renewed surge in global demand for US dollar liquidity if all costs associated with AI must be paid in dollars, making AI a vastly larger industry. 2. The second channel is the use of a specific currency to facilitate payments involving AI agents, where USD-linked stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for agentic commerce.

QWhy could stablecoins have an early advantage over tokenized CBDC deposits in the AI economy?

AStablecoins could win due to early network effects, as they are already primed to play this role in the AI economy, while tokenized Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) deposits are not yet ready for this task.

QWhat beneficial side effect for the US could result from a growth in stablecoin market capitalization backed by US treasuries?

AA growth in demand for US Treasury bonds, which are used as collateral to support the increasing market capitalization of stablecoins, would be a beneficial side effect for the United States.

QWhat recommendations are made for ASEAN+3 countries to limit their dependence on the potential 'dollar loop'?

AThe report recommends creating regional data centers and developing tokenized forms of money based on local currencies. This could help avoid strengthening the link between stablecoins and AI and allow these countries to participate in the AI economy without indirectly supporting a new level of AI dependency.

Пов'язані матеріали

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

From June to late July 2026, global stock markets, particularly technology and semiconductor stocks, experienced severe declines, with South Korea's KOSPI index facing historic circuit breakers and shedding 40% from its June peak. Key catalysts included SK Hynix's earnings miss despite record profits and competitive pressures from China's CXMT IPO. A global forced deleveraging event unfolded, devastating highly leveraged instruments like the 2x leveraged SK Hynix ETF, which lost over 80% of its value. Surprisingly, Bitcoin showed relative stability during this period, rising roughly 15% from its July low. The article clarifies this wasn't due to an inflow of equity flight capital but because Bitcoin had already undergone a significant correction in May and June, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing record outflows. True safe-haven flows went to gold, severing Bitcoin's short-term "digital gold" narrative. The sell-off is characterized not as an AI story collapse but a liquidity-driven清算 of crowded leveraged positions, potentially halfway through according to some analysts. For substantial capital to return to Bitcoin, the article cites necessary conditions: eased global liquidity pressure, a soft-landing Fed rate cut, and regulatory clarity from the stalled U.S. CLARITY Act. The conclusion is that Bitcoin is not a current safe haven but a pre-cleared asset. Its decoupling from tech stocks highlights its potential future role as a non-correlated asset for institutional portfolios, positioning it favorably for when global capital reallocates post-crisis.

marsbit19 хв тому

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

marsbit19 хв тому

"The Final Phase Before the New Cycle". What Will Happen to Bitcoin in August

"Bitcoin Faces Crucial Test in August: Experts Predict Consolidation or Further Decline" The price of Bitcoin (BTC) is expected to remain under pressure in August, with experts anticipating either consolidation within a narrow range or a potential drop below $60,000. Despite a double-digit recovery from its July low near $58,000, BTC ended the month trading around $63,500, still roughly 50% below its October 2025 peak of $126,200. Analysts cite several headwinds: a challenging macroeconomic environment with high US interest rates and persistent inflation, which makes fixed-income assets more attractive than speculative ones like crypto. Furthermore, competition for capital is intense, with many investors favoring AI-related stocks. This is reflected in significant outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, with a record $4.5 billion leaving in June and a net outflow of $5.4 billion for the first half of the year. Historically, August is a weak month for crypto, with a median return of -7.49% from 2013 to 2025. Experts also note regulatory uncertainty in the US, particularly the stalled CLARITY Act, as a dampening factor. Despite the bearish near-term outlook, several experts view the current phase as the "last phase before a new Bitcoin cycle" begins, potentially in Q4 2024. This makes it a favorable time for accumulating Bitcoin for the long term. Key price levels to watch are support at $60,000-$61,000, with a break below $58,000 potentially leading to $53,000-$55,000. A move above $67,000 could target $70,000-$75,000, though this is considered a lower probability scenario.

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

"The Final Phase Before the New Cycle". What Will Happen to Bitcoin in August

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片