Circle Announces the Acquisition of Nearly 1,000 Patents in the Blockchain and Fintech Spheres

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

Circle, the issuer of USDC, has announced the acquisition of a patent portfolio from IBM, comprising nearly 1,000 patents across 680 patent families. The portfolio covers areas including blockchain, banking, financial services, insurance, corporate infrastructure, supply chain verification, and secure cloud operations. This purchase makes Circle a leader in the U.S. in terms of Web3-related patents, significantly expanding its intellectual property as it works to build future financial systems on the internet. The deal also opens avenues for potential collaboration between Circle and IBM, though specific details and the financial terms remain undisclosed. The patents acquired stem from a period when IBM was actively filing in the blockchain space, particularly around 2018-2019. According to analysis, IBM's patent filing strategy later shifted toward focusing on the quality and value of individual patents. Circle's leadership emphasized that this intellectual property is crucial for advancing its mission and expanding blockchain infrastructure for global financial systems. Following the announcement, Circle's stock price saw a 2.2% increase.

Circle, the issuer of USDC, has announced the acquisition of a patent portfolio from IBM. It is anticipated that this will expand the organization's capabilities in building an internet-based financial system.

The press release indicates that the portfolio includes 680 patent families and nearly 1,000 individual patents. They cover areas such as blockchain, banking, financial services, insurance, corporate infrastructure, supply chain verification, and secure cloud operations.

Circle emphasized that the deal makes the company a leader in the United States in terms of the number of Web3 patents under its control. This significantly expands the company's intellectual property and its potential for building the future financial system.

Furthermore, the release states that Circle and IBM will explore various collaboration options, but details are not specified. The transaction amount is not disclosed.

It is noteworthy that between 2018 and 2019 alone, IBM registered about 500 patents in the blockchain sphere. However, this process later slowed down. In 2022 and 2023, only 41 and 13 patents were filed, respectively, according to GreyB.

As noted by the organization, this was due to a change in leadership strategy. Previously, IBM aimed to register as many patents as possible, but after 2019, it focused on increasing the value of each individual patent.

The company also has extensive ambitions in the field of quantum technologies. This may also be one of the reasons for the number of patents under its control.

"Intellectual property is crucial for advancing our mission and expanding the adoption of blockchain infrastructure. IBM is a pioneer in technological innovation, and this acquisition expands Circle's capabilities to develop the infrastructure that powers globally significant financial systems, natively built for the internet," said Sarah Wilson, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of Circle.

Following the news, Circle's stock price rose by 2.2%, according to TradingView.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did Circle announce it has purchased from IBM, and what is the expected impact?

ACircle announced the purchase of a patent portfolio from IBM, which includes nearly 1,000 patents and 680 patent families covering blockchain and fintech. This acquisition is expected to expand the company's capabilities in building the internet financial system and position it as a leader in Web3 patents in the US.

QWhat specific areas do the patents acquired by Circle from IBM cover?

AThe patents cover several key areas including blockchain, banking, financial services, insurance, corporate infrastructure, supply chain verification, and secure cloud operations.

QAccording to the article, how did IBM's patent filing strategy change after 2019?

AAfter 2019, IBM shifted its strategy from filing as many patents as possible to focusing on increasing the value of each individual patent. This change in leadership strategy led to a significant decrease in filings, from about 500 in 2018-2019 to just 41 and 13 in 2022 and 2023 respectively.

QWhat was the reaction of Circle's stock price to the news of the patent acquisition?

AFollowing the news of the patent acquisition, the stock price of Circle increased by 2.2% according to TradingView.

QWhat statement did Sarah Wilson, Chief Legal Officer at Circle, make regarding the importance of the intellectual property acquired?

ASarah Wilson stated that intellectual property is critical for advancing Circle's mission and expanding the adoption of blockchain infrastructure. She noted that IBM is a pioneer in technological innovation, and this acquisition enhances Circle's ability to develop the infrastructure powering global financial systems originally built on the internet.

Пов'язані матеріали

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit20 хв тому

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit20 хв тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit31 хв тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit31 хв тому

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

On July 27th, Changxin Technology, the largest-ever IPO on China's STAR Market, debuted with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, instantly making it the most valuable A-share company. The stellar performance delivered substantial gains for involved securities firms, primarily through equity investments rather than underwriting fees. China Merchants Securities emerged as the biggest winner. Its direct investment subsidiary, Zhaozheng Investment, alone holds a 0.54% pre-issue stake, translating to a paper profit exceeding 155 billion yuan based on the first-day closing price—surpassing the firm's entire 2025 net profit of 123.5 billion yuan. Other major beneficiaries include Huaan Securities, with an estimated profit of around 123 billion yuan from its 0.44% stake, and the lead underwriters, CICC and CITIC Securities, which each gained approximately 46 billion yuan from mandatory follow-on investments. Firms like Founder Securities, Haitong Securities, and GF Securities also reported significant holdings valued in the billions. Despite these paper gains, shares of some brokerages like Huaan and China Merchants fell on the listing day, reflecting broader market pressures. Analysts remain bullish on Changxin's long-term prospects, citing the AI-driven demand surge for DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory) and a supportive supply-demand dynamic with projected shortages through 2028. As China's largest and most advanced integrated DRAM designer and manufacturer, Changxin is poised to capture growth from domestic substitution and global market shifts, potentially challenging the current "big three" oligopoly (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron). The IPO proceeds, focused on capacity upgrades and R&D, are expected to accelerate China's semiconductor self-sufficiency.

marsbit1 год тому

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

marsbit1 год тому

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbit1 год тому

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片