Every Vote on the CLARITY Act Will Be Scored: 3 Million Crypto Supporters Want Senators to Vote 'Yes'

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

The advocacy group Stand With Crypto announced it will track and publicize U.S. senators' votes on the CLARITY Act, incorporating them into public legislator scorecards for its 3 million members to use ahead of the November elections. The group is urging a "yes" vote, stating the bill has mobilized cryptocurrency owners who seek regulatory clarity. Their pre-election survey indicates nearly 80% of crypto owners are highly likely to vote, with 70% saying a candidate's crypto stance influences their choice, and 59% identifying as swing voters—potentially making the issue decisive in tight races. The bill, which passed the Senate Banking Committee in May, now awaits a full Senate vote. However, its path is uncertain, with Galaxy Research lowering its 2026 passage odds to 30% due to timing, bipartisan support challenges, and unresolved provisions on ethics and consumer protection.

Stand With Crypto, an American cryptocurrency community advocacy organization, announced on X on July 27 that senators' votes on the CLARITY Act bill will be recorded in its public ratings on behalf of 3 million American crypto supporters.

The organization stated that each senator's vote will become part of its public legislator ratings, which cryptocurrency owners can use to compare candidates ahead of the November elections. It also urged lawmakers to vote 'yes' on this bill.

"The CLARITY Act has mobilized millions of cryptocurrency owners who eagerly await the passage of market structure legislation that will provide certainty regarding the technology they rely on," added Stand With Crypto, noting:

"Cryptocurrency-owning voters across the country are watching to see which legislators stand with them at this critical moment."

The updated ratings will record whether each senator supported advancing the bill; the vote on the CLARITY Act will be added to Stand With Crypto's existing ratings based on lawmakers' actions and public stances on cryptocurrency. The CLARITY Act vote will be one of the most prominent positions in these ratings ahead of the November midterm elections.

The organization has expanded its midterm-focused campaign, placing its scoring system at the center of efforts to transform cryptocurrency policy positions into voter-focused political achievements.

Public Scorecards Put Senators' Votes in the Spotlight

With less than 100 days until the midterm elections, Stand With Crypto's report on pre-midterm voter sentiment showed that nearly eight in ten cryptocurrency owners believe they will almost certainly vote.

Nearly 70% indicated that a candidate's stance on cryptocurrency would influence their choice, while 73% were closely following the digital asset policies legislators supported. Another 59% identified themselves as voters who do not consistently support one party, potentially giving cryptocurrency policy greater significance in tight congressional election races.

These findings reinforce the potential impact of the scorecards, especially in competitive races where politically unaffiliated cryptocurrency owners can compare candidates using their recorded positions on the CLARITY Act.

The campaign is taking place during the two-week legislative window before the August recess, with ethics provisions regarding public officials remaining a central issue in negotiations between lawmakers. Several Democratic lawmakers are pushing for stricter ethics measures and consumer protections, complicating vote counting as supporters need to secure the 60 senator votes typically required to advance a bill.

Galaxy Research lowered its assessment of the likelihood of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 to 30%, as the Senate vote faces challenges related to timing, bipartisan support, and unresolved provisions.

Next Stage: Senate Floor

On May 14, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs approved the revised market structure bill with a vote of 15 to 9, sending it to the full Senate for consideration. This bipartisan committee vote reflected the outcomes of negotiations on federal oversight, investor protection, enforcement authority, and operational requirements for digital asset companies. The bill now awaits a full Senate vote.

Under the proposed framework, federal regulators would receive clearly defined authority over various digital assets, and exchanges and intermediaries would be required to comply with registration, disclosure, and customer protection requirements.

For senators, the upcoming vote carries two significant implications: it will determine whether the bill moves forward, and it will establish a result that Stand With Crypto will present to millions of supporters.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main purpose of the organization Stand With Crypto's announcement regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main purpose is to announce that each U.S. Senator's vote on the CLARITY Act will be recorded in their public legislator scorecards, representing 3 million American crypto supporters, to help voters compare candidates ahead of the November elections.

QAccording to Stand With Crypto's pre-midterm report, what percentage of crypto owners are 'almost certain' they will vote, and why does their vote matter for tight races?

ANearly eight in ten (almost 80%) crypto owners are almost certain they will vote. Their vote matters because 59% identify as non-straight-ticket voters, meaning crypto policy positions could significantly influence their choice in competitive congressional races.

QWhat was the outcome of the CLARITY Act vote in the Senate Banking Committee, and what is the next step for the bill?

AThe Senate Banking Committee approved the amended market structure bill with a 15-9 vote, sending it to the full Senate. The next step is a floor vote in the full Senate.

QHow does Galaxy Research currently assess the likelihood of the CLARITY Act passing in 2026, and why?

AGalaxy Research has lowered its assessment of the bill's chances of passing in 2026 to 30%. This is due to challenges with timing, securing bipartisan support, and unresolved provisions related to ethics and consumer protection.

QWhat are two key implications of the upcoming Senate floor vote on the CLARITY Act for senators, according to the article?

AFor senators, the upcoming vote has two key implications: 1) It will determine whether the bill moves forward in the legislative process. 2) It will establish a result that Stand With Crypto will present to its millions of supporters as part of their public scorecards.

Пов'язані матеріали

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit5 хв тому

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit5 хв тому

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit6 хв тому

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit6 хв тому

Ethereum's 2030 Blueprint: 200x Speed Increase, Quantum-Resistance, and Native Privacy

Ethereum's 2030 Roadmap: 200x Speed, Quantum-Resistant, Native Privacy Ethereum, now in its 11th year, is guided by the "Lean Ethereum" vision, a unified development blueprint aiming to streamline the network. This plan, outlined in the evolving "Strawmap" document, targets five core goals for 2030. **1. Fast L1:** Ethereum aims for near-instant finality and faster block times. By using Zero-Knowledge (ZK) proofs to aggregate validator votes, final confirmation could drop from ~15 minutes to seconds. Block times are slated to decrease from 12 seconds to 6 seconds (2027-28) and eventually 4 seconds (2029-30). The minimum staking requirement may also lower to 1 ETH, enhancing decentralization. **2. 1 Billion Gas L1:** To break the scalability-decentralization trade-off, L1 ZK-EVM will replace redundant transaction execution with ZK proofs. This allows nodes (even on phones) to verify blocks without re-running computations, paving the way to increase L1 throughput ~200x to 1 billion gas per second. **3. Trillion-Gas L2:** Ethereum will become a high-capacity settlement layer for Layer 2 networks (L2s). Planned upgrades, like PeerDAS and subsequent optimizations, target 1 GB per second of data bandwidth for L2s (Blobs), enabling a massive ecosystem of high-throughput rollups for specialized use cases. **4. Quantum-Resistant L1:** To counter future quantum computing threats, Ethereum plans to migrate its cryptographic signatures (ECDSA, BLS) to quantum-resistant, hash-based schemes. This multi-upgrade transition is targeted for completion by 2029, securing the network in the post-quantum era. **5. Privacy-Native L1:** For the first time, native transaction privacy is an official goal. Using ZK proofs, transactions could hide sender, receiver, and amount while proving compliance with rules. This infrastructure is tentatively planned, though details remain fluid and subject to regulatory landscapes. Driven by a broader ecosystem beyond the core Foundation, this ambitious roadmap seeks to make Ethereum faster, more scalable, quantum-secure, and private, while preserving its core tenets of neutrality and trustlessness. All plans remain subject to ongoing research, audits, and community consensus.

marsbit19 хв тому

Ethereum's 2030 Blueprint: 200x Speed Increase, Quantum-Resistance, and Native Privacy

marsbit19 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片