Japan Tightens Crypto Regulations Again! FSA and National Police Agency Jointly Issue 11 New Anti-Fraud Measures

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-07

Анотація

Japanese financial authorities have intensified cryptocurrency anti-fraud measures. The Financial Services Agency (FSA), in collaboration with the National Police Agency, has issued 11 new binding requirements to the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA), applying to all exchanges regardless of size. This crackdown is a direct response to a surge in sophisticated scams, including social media investment fraud and "pig butchering" romance scams, where illicit proceeds are increasingly funneled through exchange accounts. Key regulations include mandatory verification of user identity documents during account opening, explicit warnings against account sales, and temporary withdrawal restrictions for new deposits or crypto purchases. A critical new rule introduces a pre-registration system for withdrawal addresses, requiring checks for fraud linkages and an initial holding period. Withdrawal limits will be set based on user risk profiles and must be raised cautiously. Exchanges must also enhance transaction monitoring to detect patterns linked to prevalent scams and block transactions inconsistent with an account's stated purpose. Upon identifying suspicious activity, platforms must immediately restrict or freeze accounts. Additional mandates involve enforcing multi-factor authentication for suspected impersonation and verifying sender names. The FSA also demands faster information sharing and cooperation with local police. While some system upgrades may...

Author: CoinPost

According to a report by Japanese cryptocurrency media CoinPost, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan, in collaboration with the National Police Agency, officially requested the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA) to strengthen its efforts in preventing virtual currency fraud cases on August 6th.

Content of the New Anti-Fraud Measures

On the 6th, the FSA, jointly with the National Police Agency, submitted a request to the JVCEA, proposing 11 new regulations covering areas such as a withdrawal address pre-registration system and enhanced transaction monitoring. All exchanges, regardless of their size, are subject to these new requirements.

The push behind this move is the persistent rise in cases of investment solicitation scams and "pig butchering" romance scams conducted through social media platforms. Although financial institutions have long taken countermeasures, fraudulent tactics have become increasingly sophisticated and complex, with cases even emerging where illicit funds flow directly into exchange accounts.

Dual Approach: Identity Verification and Withdrawal Restrictions

The new regulations require exchanges to establish more robust mechanisms to verify the authenticity of identity documents submitted during account opening and to clearly inform users that buying or selling accounts is illegal. Furthermore, users will have their withdrawals restricted for a certain period after completing a fiat deposit or purchasing virtual currency.

Regarding withdrawal addresses, the FSA demands the introduction of a pre-registration system: newly registered withdrawal addresses must first be checked for any association with fraud cases before a restricted period is set. Additionally, exchanges must set withdrawal limits based on user risk assessment results and transaction purposes, and any increase in limits must be handled with extra caution.

Enhanced Transaction Monitoring and Closer Cooperation with Police

In terms of transaction monitoring, the new rules require exchanges to promptly adjust their detection strategies in response to the recent high-frequency fraud methods, strengthening the identification of anomalous transactions inconsistent with account purposes. Once suspicious transactions are detected, measures such as restricting transactions or freezing accounts must be taken immediately.

Other requirements include: mandating multi-factor authentication when identity impersonation is suspected, verifying the consistency between the remitter's name and the account holder's real name, among others. The FSA also requires exchanges to establish rapid information-sharing and collaboration mechanisms with local police authorities. For projects that require system modifications and are difficult to implement in the short term, the FSA stated that phased implementation according to plan is acceptable.

Пов'язані питання

QWhich two Japanese authorities jointly issued the 11 new anti-fraud regulations for cryptocurrency?

AThe Financial Services Agency (FSA) and the National Police Agency (NPA) of Japan jointly issued the regulations.

QTo which industry association were the 11 new anti-fraud measures formally directed?

AThe measures were formally directed to the Japan Virtual and Crypto assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).

QWhat are two specific user-facing requirements under the new regulations regarding withdrawals?

AThe regulations require the introduction of a pre-registration system for withdrawal addresses and allow for withdrawal limits based on user risk assessment. They also impose a waiting period before withdrawals can be made after a fiat deposit or crypto purchase.

QAccording to the article, what is a primary reason behind the issuance of these new regulations?

AThe primary reason is the continuous rise in investment solicitation scams via social media and romance scams ('pig butchering' scams), with illicit funds increasingly flowing directly into exchange accounts.

QWhat must exchanges do when they detect suspicious transactions under the new rules?

AExchanges must immediately take measures such as restricting transactions or freezing the account when suspicious transactions are detected.

Пов'язані матеріали

a16z Crypto: Marc Andreessen and Chris Dixon Explain Why the 'CLARITY Act' Is Urgently Needed

The CLARITY Act proposes a critical federal regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto market. Currently, a lack of clear rules creates uncertainty, hinders innovation, and leaves consumers exposed. The Act would clearly divide regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC, mandate disclosures and insider restrictions for projects, and bring exchanges and other intermediaries under a comprehensive oversight system akin to traditional finance. This clarity is urgently needed as crypto has evolved from a niche interest into a major industry with institutional involvement. Clear, lasting rules would protect consumers by requiring proper audits, custody of client assets, and anti-fraud measures for registered platforms, helping prevent failures like FTX. Regulatory ambiguity currently punishes compliant U.S. firms with high costs while rewarding offshore competitors who bypass rules, creating a race to the bottom. The Act addresses national security by applying existing anti-money laundering rules to crypto intermediaries and distinguishes between legitimate privacy and illicit concealment. It also resolves banking sector concerns by prohibiting interest payments on stablecoin balances while permitting transaction-based rewards. For developers, it establishes liability based on intent and direct assistance to crime, not for unforeseeable downstream misuse of open-source software. Regarding securities law, the Act introduces a risk-based framework. Assets begin under SEC oversight when a network is centralized, transitioning to CFTC commodity regulation if it becomes sufficiently decentralized, with clear definitions to avoid constant litigation. Without the Act, regulatory uncertainty driven by shifting agency interpretations will persist, discouraging long-term investment in the U.S. and pushing development offshore, reducing American oversight and economic leadership. Support for the bipartisan bill comes from lawmakers, law enforcement (like the Fraternal Order of Police), and major financial institutions. Ultimately, the CLARITY Act is essential to establish a stable, sensible regulatory environment that fosters responsible innovation, enhances consumer protection, and ensures U.S. leadership in shaping the future of financial technology.

marsbit1 год тому

a16z Crypto: Marc Andreessen and Chris Dixon Explain Why the 'CLARITY Act' Is Urgently Needed

marsbit1 год тому

Citi's Interpretation: Why Does Citi Still Give SanDisk a Target Price of $2500 After Earnings Report Despite a Significant Stock Price Drop?

Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on SanDisk with a $2500 price target despite a post-earnings stock drop. This target, implying an 85.1% upside from the August 5th close of $1350.50, hinges on the firm's view that SanDisk merits a higher valuation than traditional NAND cyclical stocks. Although SanDisk reported strong Q4 FY26 results with revenue up 51% sequentially and robust full-year data center growth (+437%), its stock fell sharply on August 6th. Investors are concerned about potential NAND price growth moderation and guidance that failed to meet elevated market expectations. Citi's bullish thesis centers on SanDisk's new long-term "New Business Model" (NBM) agreements. These contracts, covering a significant portion of its NAND bit output for FY27 and FY28, represent minimum revenue commitments of approximately $94 billion backed by financial guarantees. This structure aims to increase revenue and cash flow predictability. The report links this visibility to AI data center demand, driven by the expansion of inference workloads requiring more storage. Citi estimates data center storage capacity demand will grow about 35% in CY27. However, the analysis notes long-term contracts cannot eliminate the NAND cycle. Risks include potential oversupply from industry capacity expansion, competition, and macroeconomic headwinds. The $2500 target essentially bets that AI demand and these contracts can reduce earnings volatility enough to support a premium valuation (~11x CY27E EPS). Key factors to watch are the execution of the $94B commitments, pricing mechanisms, actual data center demand, and industry supply dynamics.

marsbit1 год тому

Citi's Interpretation: Why Does Citi Still Give SanDisk a Target Price of $2500 After Earnings Report Despite a Significant Stock Price Drop?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片