Bitcoin Spot ETFs Register $360M In Net Outflows, Extend 4-Week Red Streak

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2026-02-15Востаннє оновлено о 2026-02-15

Анотація

US Bitcoin Spot ETFs extended their outflow streak to four consecutive weeks, with a net withdrawal of $359.91 million in the second week of February. This brings total outflows for 2026 to $2.28 billion, reflecting persistent institutional caution amid Bitcoin's price volatility. While the week started with $311.56 million in net inflows, sentiment shifted mid-week with significant outflows from major issuers. BlackRock's IBIT led the outflows at $234.65 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC at $124.73 million. Grayscale's GBTC also saw redemptions, though its secondary product, Grayscale BTC, attracted $110.08 million in inflows. Despite the short-term outflows, the total net assets for all Bitcoin spot ETFs remain strong at approximately $87 billion, with cumulative net inflows since their 2024 launch at $54.33 billion. Bitcoin was trading at $69,479 at the time of reporting.

The US Bitcoin Spot ETFs continued to experience capital flight last week, recording significant net outflows across major issuers. The sustained withdrawals reflect cautious institutional sentiment amid Bitcoin’s recent price struggles, as the premier cryptocurrency is presently down by 30% on its monthly chart.

Grayscale’s BTC Shines With $110M Amid Market Struggles

According to data from SoSoValue, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded total net outflows of $359.91 million in February’s second week, driven primarily by mid-week capital withdrawals. The week began on a bullish note, with investors making a combined net deposit of $311.56 million between Monday and Tuesday. However, the optimism proved short-lived as the ETF market registered $686.87 million in net withdrawals between Wednesday and Thursday. Friday closed the week with a modest $15.20 million inflow, suggesting slight stabilization in investor sentiment.

In analyzing individual fund performance, there was mixed performance across the market. The largest outflows came from market leader BlackRock’s IBIT, which saw $234.65 million in net withdrawals, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC, recording $124.73 million in outflows. Grayscale GBTC also experienced notable aggregate redemptions totaling $77.03 million, though its secondary product, Grayscale BTC, attracted $110.08 million in net inflows, partially offsetting losses.

Ark Invest/21Shares’ CBOE and Bitwise’s BITB posted net outflows of $19.44 million and $29.81 million, respectively, while VanEck’s HODL each recorded modest inflows of $4.03 million. Meanwhile, Franklin Templeton’s EZBC attracted $2.35 million, while WisdomTree’s BTCW recorded a stronger inflow of $14.06 million. Similarly, Invesco’s BTCO lost $6.84 million, and Valkyrie BRRR saw small inflows of $2.08 million, while Hashdex’s DEFI registered no notable movement during the period.

Bitcoin Spot ETFs Outlook

The recent weekly losses contribute to a broader trend of declining ETF flows in 2026. So far, February has recorded total net outflows of $677.86 million, with aggregate 2026 withdrawals now at $2.28 billion, reflecting persistent institutional caution. The sustained redemptions appear closely tied to Bitcoin’s recent price volatility, which appears to dampen risk appetite among institutional investors.

Nevertheless, the ETF ecosystem remains strong, with total net assets across all Bitcoin spot ETFs currently at approximately $87 billion. Additionally, cumulative net inflows since the launch in January 2024 remain robust at $54.33 billion, suggesting that long-term institutional adoption remains intact even amid short-term capital rotation.

At press time, Bitcoin continues to trade at $69,479, reflecting a minor 0.99% gain in the last day.

BTC trading at $70,347 on the daily chart | Source: BTCUSDT chart on Tradingview.com

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total net outflow for US Bitcoin Spot ETFs in the second week of February, and what was the primary driver?

AThe total net outflow was $359.91 million, driven primarily by mid-week capital withdrawals.

QWhich two major issuers saw the largest outflows from their Bitcoin Spot ETFs?

ABlackRock's IBIT saw the largest outflow at $234.65 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC with $124.73 million in outflows.

QDespite the overall outflows, which Grayscale product saw significant inflows and how much were they?

AGrayscale's BTC product saw significant net inflows of $110.08 million.

QWhat is the total value of net assets across all Bitcoin spot ETFs, and what does this suggest about the ecosystem?

AThe total net assets are approximately $87 billion, suggesting the ETF ecosystem remains strong.

QWhat is the cumulative net inflow for Bitcoin spot ETFs since their launch in January 2024, and what does this indicate about long-term adoption?

AThe cumulative net inflow is $54.33 billion, indicating that long-term institutional adoption remains robust despite short-term volatility.

Пов'язані матеріали

From 'Word Unit' to 'Symbol Unit': The Debate Over the Chinese Translation of 'Token' and Its Underlying AI Cognitive Implications

Recent discussions have emerged regarding the official Chinese translation of the AI term "Token," which has been recommended as “词元” (Cíyuán, meaning "word unit") by the National Committee for Terminology in Science and Technology. While this translation is argued to align with historical usage in natural language processing (NLP) and is considered concise and communicable, this article presents a critical counterview advocating for “符元” (Fúyuán, meaning "symbol unit") as a more structurally accurate and future-proof alternative. The author argues that defining Token based on its origin in NLP—as a linguistic semantic unit—overlooks its evolution into a general-purpose, discrete symbolic unit used across multimodal systems (text, image, audio, etc.). Using “词元” ties the concept too narrowly to language, causing cognitive misalignment and semantic drift when applied in non-linguistic contexts. By contrast, “符元” reflects Token’s fundamental role as a symbol in information theory and computation, independent of modality. The article further critiques the reliance on metaphorical extensions (e.g., comparing image patches to “words”) as insufficient for rigorous terminology. It highlights risks including confusion with existing linguistic terms like Lemma (also translated as “词元”), poor cross-lingual reversibility (e.g., difficult back-translation to English), and systemic misunderstanding among non-expert audiences. In conclusion, the author emphasizes that terminology should align with computational essence—not historical usage or explanatory convenience—to ensure conceptual clarity and scalability in AI’s multidisciplinary future. “符元” is proposed as a more neutral, stable, and structurally coherent translation for Token.

marsbit4 хв тому

From 'Word Unit' to 'Symbol Unit': The Debate Over the Chinese Translation of 'Token' and Its Underlying AI Cognitive Implications

marsbit4 хв тому

SEC Chair Presses Congress On Crypto Market Structure, Wants Bill To Reach President’s Desk

SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins urged Congress to pass the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for crypto markets in the U.S. He emphasized the need to move away from "regulation by enforcement" and enable coordinated oversight by the SEC and CFTC. His comments follow similar calls from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who warned that the U.S. risks losing its leadership in financial innovation without such legislation. The push comes amid ongoing disputes between banks and crypto firms over provisions in the already-passed stablecoin bill (GENIUS Act), particularly regarding restrictions on interest payments for stablecoin holders. Despite bipartisan efforts, no compromise has been reached.

bitcoinist25 хв тому

SEC Chair Presses Congress On Crypto Market Structure, Wants Bill To Reach President’s Desk

bitcoinist25 хв тому

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe internal crisis marked by the departure of key service providers, raising concerns about its governance, security, and future direction. The crisis began when Chaos Labs, the protocol's long-time risk management provider, terminated its relationship with Aave. The firm cited financial losses, the exit of other major contributors, and fundamental disagreements over the risk architecture of the upcoming Aave V4. Aave Labs declined Chaos Labs' demands for a significant fee increase and exclusive control over key functions like risk management and oracle services. This exit followed the departure of two other critical partners. BGD Labs, the primary technical contributor to Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of forcing an aggressive transition to V4 by limiting V3 development and devaluing its work. Subsequently, the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a major governance service provider, announced its planned exit, criticizing Aave Labs for centralizing power and controlling a large portion of voting tokens. The conflict highlights a central paradox within DAOs: the tension between founder-led vision and decentralized governance, and between long-term protocol health and short-term capital interests. Aave Labs is pushing for a more integrated and efficient "Aave Will Win" model with V4, arguing it is necessary for competing at an institutional level. However, critics warn this centralization comes at the cost of the protocol's decentralized credibility and increases systemic risk. The immediate impacts include a potential security downgrade, a loss of institutional knowledge, and damaged community trust. While Aave Labs views this as a painful but necessary transition, the market is watching cautiously as the protocol navigates this period of significant internal turmoil.

marsbit33 хв тому

Aave Mired in a Crisis of Confidence: Service Providers Exit En Masse, Failures in Technology, Governance, and Risk Control

marsbit33 хв тому

Hyperliquid: Can a $2.3 mln whale buy drive HYPE to $50?

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has been trading within an ascending channel, reaching a two-week high of $40.9 and currently priced at $40.4, with 4.7% daily and 14% weekly gains. A newly created whale wallet deposited $5 million into Hyperliquid and purchased 59.2k HYPE worth $2.3 million, with an additional $2.6 million in USDC likely for further purchases. This whale activity and rising long positions, reflected in a Long/Short Ratio of 1.41, indicate strong bullish sentiment. Technical indicators like the RSI at 63 and price holding above key moving averages support continued upward momentum, potentially targeting $50 if resistance at $43 is broken. However, profit-taking has been observed, with $4.9 million in positive netflow, which could trigger a pullback. Key support levels are at $37 and $35.

ambcrypto37 хв тому

Hyperliquid: Can a $2.3 mln whale buy drive HYPE to $50?

ambcrypto37 хв тому

Polymarket Sees Record $153M Daily Volume After Chainlink Integration

Polymarket experienced a significant surge in activity following its integration with Chainlink's data feeds, achieving a record $153 million in average daily volume—a threefold increase. The platform's short-duration crypto markets, which update every five and fifteen minutes, have collectively processed over $4 billion in total volume. Notably, the five-minute markets alone attracted more than $200 million in their first week. Chainlink's oracles provided the necessary real-time, reliable pricing to support the fast-paced trading environment, attracting both retail and institutional participants. This integration is credited as the key catalyst for the growth, enhancing market liquidity and enabling secure, high-volume transactions without compromising on speed or trust.

bitcoinist44 хв тому

Polymarket Sees Record $153M Daily Volume After Chainlink Integration

bitcoinist44 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни 4 (4).