From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight NewsОпубліковано о 2026-07-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-20

Анотація

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."


Authored by: Forbes

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News


The year 2026 has been quite challenging for Bitcoin, as it failed to sustain the historical high of over $126,000 it briefly broke last year. Despite multiple favorable signals released by U.S. President Trump, Bitcoin's price has still fallen by more than 50% cumulatively since last October. However, several analysts point out that the Federal Reserve's potential policy shift might be brewing a turnaround.


Just as BlackRock's CEO recently issued a new 12-month Bitcoin price forecast, Eric Balchunas, Senior ETF Analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, offered a highly relevant comparison: the army of Bitcoin ETFs is likely to make Bitcoin's price action "mirror" the "victory and pain" journey of gold over the past two decades.


Balchunas posted on platform X, stating: "The 22-year history of gold ETFs is perhaps the closest roadmap available for Bitcoin ETF investors." Since the inception of gold ETFs in 2004, the price of gold has skyrocketed, with its total market capitalization now approaching $28 trillion. This figure alone is enough to spark market speculation—if Bitcoin can replicate part of gold's successful path, its potential upside would be extremely substantial.


He further analyzed: "Both gold and Bitcoin are packaged products of non-yielding stores of value. They generate no cash flow, and the core driver of their prices relies entirely on investor sentiment, rather than the profitability of traditional stocks, the coupons of bonds, or the credit backing of governments."


Over the past two decades, gold ETFs have experienced dramatic ups and downs: they briefly became the world's largest ETF in 2011, then entered a prolonged eight-year downturn, struggling to recover. Balchunas believes that Bitcoin ETFs are following a similar script—"impressive gains, painful pullbacks, and recovery phases requiring immense patience to endure." It is noteworthy that each cycle of gold ETFs has pushed historical highs higher, which is particularly encouraging for long-term Bitcoin holders.


Looking back at the development of Bitcoin ETFs: In early 2024, after over a decade of persistent advocacy from the crypto community, spot Bitcoin ETFs were finally approved and entered the market. Wall Street institutions flocked in, with several leading funds quickly becoming some of the fastest-growing ETF products in history. This not only marked Bitcoin's transition from a fringe asset to the mainstream financial system but also set the stage for subsequent price volatility.


However, volatility remains ever-present. Earlier this month, analysts from Bitfinex exchange warned that a "shocking" large-scale outflow of ETF funds could directly interrupt the current rebound momentum. Bitcoin has rebounded nearly 10% from the low below $57,000 in early July, but the market remains highly vigilant.


As the absolute leader in the Bitcoin ETF space, BlackRock's IBIT fund has sold nearly 100,000 Bitcoins in recent months to meet redemption pressure and still holds over 733,000 Bitcoins, with assets under management close to $50 billion. This also reflects the liquidity characteristics of institutional funds—both inflows and outflows can trigger significant market reactions.


Despite Bitcoin's substantial price correction this year, many long-term bulls remain highly confident. They generally believe that Bitcoin has the potential to experience long-term prosperity comparable to that of gold. Balchunas himself emphasized the "spiritual parallel" between the two: "Gold exploded in popularity back then, surpassing the world's largest ETF, SPY, in size on a single day in 2011, then fell out of favor for years. IBIT similarly surged to a peak of $100 billion in assets under management in a single day—that was precisely the top in October 2025. Both have nearly fixed supplies; when demand surges intensely, it easily triggers price explosions. The problem is that demand tends to be fickle, coming in waves rather than steadily and continuously."


From the perspective of seasoned observers in the crypto industry, this comparison holds significant practical meaning. Gold has achieved long-term value anchoring through its scarcity, safe-haven attributes, and global recognition; Bitcoin, under its halving mechanism, decentralized network, and increasingly strong institutional adoption, exhibits traits similar to "digital gold." The emergence of ETFs has further lowered the barrier to holding, allowing traditional investors to gain exposure without directly holding Bitcoin, undoubtedly amplifying demand elasticity.


Currently, the market remains optimistic about the resilience of ETF demand. Simon-Peter Massabni, Business Development Director at XS.com, pointed out: "Institutional demand remains one of Bitcoin's most solid pillars. Spot Bitcoin ETFs continue to record stable fund inflows, while more and more companies are beginning to incorporate digital assets into their portfolio diversification strategies. This institutional interest effectively alleviates selling pressure during recent market corrections."


Looking ahead, Bitcoin's trajectory will be deeply influenced by the macro environment, regulatory dynamics, and institutional behavior. Gold's market cap has reached nearly $28 trillion. If Bitcoin can gradually assume a similar "store of value" status, even reaching just a fraction of gold's market capitalization, it would bring about extremely considerable appreciation potential. Of course, the process will inevitably be accompanied by sharp volatility—this is precisely the essence of the crypto market's "high risk, high reward."


For ordinary investors, the key lies in maintaining rationality, diversifying risks, and focusing on long-term trends rather than short-term noise. Bitcoin's story is far from over. As more traditional capital enters and infrastructure improves, the prologue to this "price explosion" may have just begun. From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to Eric Balchunas, what is the most relevant roadmap for Bitcoin ETF investors, and why?

AEric Balchunas suggests that the 22-year history of the gold ETF is the most relevant roadmap for Bitcoin ETF investors. He makes this comparison because both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding, store-of-value assets packaged as products. Their prices are driven purely by investor sentiment rather than fundamentals like earnings, coupons, or government credit. Gold ETFs have undergone dramatic cycles of explosive gains, painful drawdowns, and prolonged recoveries, patterns that Bitcoin ETFs are likely to mirror.

QWhat was a significant milestone for Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024, and what impact did it have?

AIn early 2024, spot Bitcoin ETFs were finally approved for the market. This marked a pivotal moment as Wall Street institutions rushed in, with several leading funds becoming some of the fastest-growing ETFs in history. This approval signified Bitcoin's transition from a niche asset to the mainstream financial system and set the stage for subsequent price volatility.

QWhat potential market risk did Bitfinex analysts warn about regarding Bitcoin ETFs at the time of the article?

ABitfinex analysts warned that a 'shocking' large-scale outflow of funds from Bitcoin ETFs could directly interrupt the ongoing market rebound. This highlights the significant impact that institutional fund flows can have on Bitcoin's price stability and momentum.

QWhat key similarity between gold and Bitcoin does Balchunas highlight as a driver for potential explosive price moves?

ABalchunas highlights that both gold and Bitcoin have a nearly fixed supply. When demand surges or becomes highly concentrated, this inherent scarcity can trigger explosive price movements. However, he notes that such demand is often fickle and wave-like rather than stable and continuous.

QAccording to Simon-Peter Massabni, why has institutional demand been a crucial pillar for Bitcoin's price stability?

ASimon-Peter Massabni states that institutional demand remains one of Bitcoin's most solid pillars. He points to the consistent inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs and the growing trend of corporations including digital assets in their diversification strategies. This sustained institutional interest has effectively cushioned selling pressure during recent market corrections.

Пов'язані матеріали

New Fire Research Institute: Inflation May Become a Stubborn Problem, Can Cryptocurrencies Achieve Independent Performance in the Short Term?

New Fire Research Institute argues that despite the recent U.S. June CPI decline to 3.5% year-on-year—primarily driven by energy—core goods inflation remains persistent, with core PCE likely showing slight growth. Federal Reserve Chairman Wash has emphasized the Fed's independence and a "zero tolerance" stance on inflation, suggesting a continued hawkish posture that will pressure risk assets, especially if energy prices rise again. Concurrently, the semiconductor memory sector faces structural pressures, as seen in significant sell-offs for Micron and SK Hynix. High leverage in markets like South Korea is triggering deleveraging, amplifying volatility. Investors are also questioning the sustainability of AI-related capital expenditures. In contrast, the crypto market showed relative stability last week, with BTC and ETH gaining slightly. Positive developments include a shift to net inflows for U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs, a narrowing Coinbase discount, and strong activity on the Robinhood Chain ecosystem. The potential advancement of the U.S. CLARITY Act provides a policy catalyst. Overall, the probability of an independent crypto bull run in the short term is low, given overarching macro pressures. However, fundamentals are improving with ETF inflows and robust on-chain activity, providing solid support. Technically, BTC and ETH show strong support at key moving averages. New Fire Research maintains that Bitcoin around $60,000 represents a high-value allocation zone, with limited downside risk near current levels. The true bull market catalyst awaits a confirmed market bottom combined with a macro policy shift and legislative progress.

marsbit18 хв тому

New Fire Research Institute: Inflation May Become a Stubborn Problem, Can Cryptocurrencies Achieve Independent Performance in the Short Term?

marsbit18 хв тому

Base Under Pressure

**Title: The Pressure Mounts for Base** Base, the Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution backed by Coinbase, is facing significant pressure and public scrutiny from its leadership following the launch of Robinhood Chain. Base co-founder Jesse Pollak recently acknowledged strategic missteps, admitting that the chain's past focus on social and creator tokens (e.g., through Farcaster, Zora) failed to deliver sustainable adoption. He has refocused on core infrastructure, handing leadership of the Base App back to Coinbase's Cobie. While Base remains a top L2 contender alongside OP Mainnet and Arbitrum, and boasts the highest TVL (nearly $12B), its weaknesses are being highlighted by the new competitor. Key criticisms include its slow progress on decentralization. Base has faced issues with its single sequencer causing block production halts, and L2BEAT is reportedly considering downgrading its decentralization rating from Stage 1 to Stage 0. This contrasts sharply with the rapid initial success of Robinhood Chain, whose DEX quickly entered the top five by volume. The leadership styles of the parent companies are also being compared: Robinhood's CEO actively engages with new projects, while a recent incident where Coinbase's Brian Armstrong briefly changed his profile picture—sparking and then crashing a related meme token—drew community ire and mockery. Pollak stated Base is working with Coinbase on tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by real equity, differentiating it from Robinhood's derivatives model. However, the article argues that Base's most urgent task is to address its long-standing technical and trust issues. With more traditional finance players likely to emulate Robinhood's path, Base must use this competitive pressure to solidify its position as long-term financial infrastructure.

Foresight News35 хв тому

Base Under Pressure

Foresight News35 хв тому

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

On July 21st, industry sources reported that the Trump administration has agreed to include an ethics provision in the "Clarity Act" (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025). This concession addresses the long-standing conflict-of-interest concerns regarding government officials and the crypto industry, potentially removing the final major obstacle to the bill's progress. Additionally, Patrick Witt, the executive director of the White House's Digital Asset Advisory Committee, confirmed he will remain in his role to help finalize the bill, alleviating previous concerns about his potential departure. The Clarity Act aims to establish a unified federal regulatory framework for the U.S. digital asset market. Its core objective is to resolve regulatory ambiguity by defining different types of digital assets (digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins) and clarifying the respective oversight roles of the SEC and CFTC. This would end the long-running jurisdictional dispute between the two agencies and provide clearer compliance paths for the industry. With the ethics issue moving toward resolution, the most urgent challenge now is time. The U.S. Congress is set to begin its August recess in mid-August, leaving only a few working weeks to finalize the text and advance the bill through the Senate. Industry advocates, like the Blockchain Association's Kristin Smith, stress that this is a critical moment. If negotiations conclude successfully in the coming weeks, the Clarity Act could pass a key hurdle before the recess; otherwise, it may face significant delays. If enacted, the Clarity Act could mark a historic turning point in crypto regulation. By providing a clearer and more predictable legal framework, it aims to reduce uncertainty for businesses, developers, and traditional financial institutions looking to enter the digital asset space, potentially setting a global benchmark for market structure regulation.

Odaily星球日报41 хв тому

White House Concession Removes Ethical Hurdle, Clarity Act Races Against Final Window Before Recess?

Odaily星球日报41 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片