Journalists Point to a Shift of Crypto-Treasury Companies Towards AI

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

At least a dozen companies previously focused on acquiring digital assets for their treasuries have pivoted toward AI-related businesses in recent months, according to a Bloomberg report. This strategic shift, however, has failed to revive investor interest. The stocks of these US and Canadian data-asset treasury (DAT) firms have fallen a median 43% year-to-date, with many trading below their net asset value as management teams exit. Examples of this transformation include K Wave Media Ltd., which switched from accumulating Bitcoin to developing data centers, seeing its shares drop 71% since its May relaunch. Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc. and AlphaTON Capital (rebranded as Alpha Compute) also saw significant declines after strategic shifts. Analysts link the sector's weakness directly to the poor performance of the digital assets themselves. Legal experts note the term "crypto treasury" has become a "dirty word" for investors. The pivot to AI is seen as a logical move to attract the large capital flowing into tech infrastructure, driven by spending from giants like Alphabet and Microsoft and startups like OpenAI. While attempts to capitalize on the AI boom extend beyond crypto—exemplified by shoe maker Allbirds rebranding as Smartbird—bitcoin miners like CoreWeave, Hut 8, Iren, and TeraWulf have seen more success by repurposing their data centers for high-performance computing. Investors remain interested in other blockchain applications but have largely abandoned the ...

The stocks of DAT-structured companies continue to decline.

At least 12 companies that built their businesses around purchasing digital assets have recently shifted their focus to AI-related areas. Bloomberg emphasized that the change in strategy has not yet helped restore investor interest.

The stocks of DAT firms tracked by the publication in the US and Canada have shown a median decline of 43% since the beginning of the year. Many are trading below the net value of the assets they own, and management teams are exiting the business.

Source: Bloomberg.

The journalists provided specific examples of business "transformation." For instance, Bitcoin-accumulating K Wave Media Ltd. switched to developing data centers—since its relaunch in May, its stock has fallen by 71%.

The shares of Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc. dropped by 33% after the company agreed to merge with a firm from the energy sector in June. AlphaTON Capital, which holds altcoins on its balance sheet, lost 33% after rebranding to Alpha Compute in April.

Bloomberg directly links the weakness of the DAT sector to the dynamics of the assets themselves.

Gregory Sichenzia, founder of the law firm Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP, succinctly described the change in sentiment: if last year nothing bad was expected from crypto-treasuries, this year the phrase itself has become a "dirty word."

In his opinion, the shift to AI looks logical—that is where major capital is currently flowing. The spending by tech giants like Alphabet and Microsoft, as well as startups OpenAI and Anthropic, on computing infrastructure has made companies related to data centers the best-performing stocks in major indices.

Nearly all firms in the top 10 by performance in the S&P 500 index produce products for data centers: among them are SanDisk, whose stock has risen more than 500%, as well as Dell Technologies, Intel, and Micron Technology.

Attempts to capitalize on the AI hype extend far beyond the crypto market. Bloomberg cites the example of shoe manufacturer Allbirds, which shifted toward computing infrastructure after its own stock plummeted and rebranded to Smartbird.

Among companies in the crypto industry, Bitcoin miners are currently having more success than DAT firms in reorienting towards AI. CoreWeave switched to cloud computing, which positively impacted its stock.

The quotes of Hut 8, Iren, and TeraWulf are also recovering after retooling their data centers for data centers.

Partner at Lowenstein Sandler Daniel Forman emphasized that investors are not completely abandoning the blockchain theme: interest remains in other areas of the technology, but not in the digital treasury model in its current form.

Recall that Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the shift of crypto projects to AI a mistake.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what is the current trend among many companies that were built around acquiring digital assets?

AAt least 12 such companies have reoriented their strategies towards AI-related directions in recent months, moving away from their original digital asset focus.

QHow have the stock prices of these reorienting DAT companies performed in general, based on the article's data?

ATheir stocks have shown a median decline of 43% since the beginning of the year, with many trading below the net value of their assets.

QWhat major reason does the article cite for the poor performance of the DAT sector despite the shift to AI?

ABloomberg directly links the weakness of the DAT sector to the poor performance dynamics of the digital assets themselves.

QWhy does the founder of Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP, Gregory Sichenzia, believe the shift to AI is logical for these companies?

AHe believes it is logical because that is where major capital is currently flowing, driven by heavy spending on computing infrastructure by tech giants and AI startups.

QWhich segment within the crypto industry has reportedly had more success in pivoting to AI compared to DAT firms, according to the article?

ABitcoin miners have reportedly had better success. For example, CoreWeave's shift to cloud computing positively impacted its stock, and miners like Hut 8 are recovering after repurposing their data centers.

Пов'язані матеріали

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

This article analyzes recent news about China's domestic DUV lithography machines, advising a measured perspective. A state-backed enterprise plans to deliver about 5 immersion DUV systems this year, with a 2027 target of 20 units, aimed at 28nm processes. While this marks a step from R&D into initial customer validation, the author cautions against over-optimism. The piece clarifies this is DUV, not EUV technology. DUV is crucial but cannot economically solve challenges for advanced nodes like 5nm or below, where EUV is key. The 5-unit volume is minimal compared to ASML's annual output of over 130 such machines. The author highlights unverified claims regarding specs like 90% yield and warns against conflating this news with unconfirmed reports about Shanghai Micro Electronics' production. China's EUV efforts, while progressing with a prototype, remain in early testing, facing significant hurdles in core components like high-precision optics. The analogy of a "DeepSeek moment" is deemed misleading, as lithography involves slow, iterative precision engineering, not rapid software-like breakthroughs. Current progress represents establishing a potential second supply source and gaining vital engineering experience rather than an imminent industry disruption. For investors, the key indicators to watch are formal customer acceptance, stable operational performance, repeat orders, and growth in production volume and component localization. The conclusion is that this is a positive but early-stage development, far from altering the global competitive landscape.

marsbit1 год тому

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

marsbit1 год тому

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit1 год тому

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit1 год тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit1 год тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片