Russian Miners Refused Exclusion from 'Take and Pay' Scheme

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-31Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-31

Анотація

The Russian Ministry of Energy has clarified that cryptocurrency mining companies will not be excluded from the new "take-or-pay" pricing scheme, despite ongoing discussions and complaints. Under this mechanism, set to take effect from January 1, miners will have to pay for nearly all the kilowatts of their maximum declared power capacity, not just for their actual electricity consumption. While the draft document is being adjusted, primarily to exempt utility companies (water and heat suppliers), miners face stricter rules: they are placed in a separate category and will be subject to the scheme regardless of their connection date, with a minimum payable volume set at 90% of their declared capacity (compared to 70% for others). The scheme, targeting industrial consumers with over 670 kW capacity and expected to fully launch by 2027, requires payment based on maximum possible consumption. Utility companies had argued that inclusion would at least double their costs, which would then be passed on to consumers via tariffs. They also criticized the proposed power thresholds as lacking technological or economic justification, claiming they would generate extra revenue for grid operators. Mining companies oppose the plan. Firm "Algorithm" warned in a study that rising energy costs are already making continuous grid-powered mining economically unviable in Russia within 2-3 years, putting the country at a competitive disadvantage against major US companies. In a letter to the Mini...

Even if their comments are considered, nothing will change for miners, the Ministry of Energy clarifies: cryptocurrency mining companies will not be removed from the scope of the new mechanism—meaning they will have to pay starting January 1 not based on actual consumption, but for nearly all kilowatts of their maximum power capacity.

The document is being amended primarily for the benefit of utility companies. Specifically, it is proposed not to apply the new mechanism to heat, water supply, and wastewater disposal enterprises, writes the publication citing participants of a working group meeting.

Utility companies complain about costs and point out that, according to the draft ministry resolution, they are required to have backup power sources, which will have to be paid for additionally. Expenses could at least double, and ultimately these costs will be factored into tariffs and fall on the shoulders of the population, utility companies lament. Additionally, they note that the threshold power values proposed by the draft have no technological or economic connection to the actual costs of power grid companies, leading to extra revenue for grid operators, complain working group participants.

The Ministry of Energy explained to Kommersant journalists that large data centers (DCs) and mining facilities have been placed in a separate group—the mechanism will apply to them in any case, regardless of their grid connection date—that is, for both new and all existing electricity buyers. Moreover, for miners, the minimum payable volume is proposed to be set immediately at 90% of the company's declared capacity, not at 70% as for others.

The 'take or pay' principle implies that consumers will pay for electricity not based on actual consumption, but based on the maximum possible volumes of electricity consumption. The scheme will affect industrial enterprises with a capacity exceeding 670 kW. The Ministry of Energy expects the new mechanism to come into effect in 2027.

Previously, the mining company 'Algorithm' conducted a study showing that within the next two to three years, the model of continuous operation of mining farms from the power grid will become economically unviable in Russia. Due to rising energy costs, Russia is already 'losing competition to large American companies,' the study's authors concluded.

'Algorithm' sent a letter to the Russian Ministry of Energy requesting abandonment of the 'take and pay' principle. The letter argued that under current unfavorable economic conditions, miners could become energy-balancing organizations—capable of utilizing power capacities during idle periods and, conversely, limiting consumption when the grid is under strain.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main regulatory change affecting cryptocurrency miners in Russia according to the article?

AThe main change is the implementation of a 'take-or-pay' principle starting January 1, where miners will have to pay based on almost all kilowatts of their maximum contracted power capacity, not based on their actual electricity consumption.

QWhich specific sector is proposed to be exempted from the new 'take-or-pay' mechanism, and why?

AThe communal sector (heat, water supply, and sewerage companies) is proposed to be exempted. The reason is that these companies complain about increased costs, including the need for expensive backup power sources, which would ultimately raise tariffs for the population.

QHow does the minimum payable volume for miners under the new scheme differ from that for other industrial consumers?

AFor cryptocurrency miners, the minimum payable volume is proposed to be set at 90% of their declared power capacity. For other consumers subject to the scheme, it is set at 70%.

QWhat potential benefit did the mining company 'Algorithm' suggest miners could provide to the energy system in their appeal to the Ministry of Energy?

AThe 'Algorithm' company suggested that miners could act as energy-balancing organizations. They could load up power capacities during periods of low demand (when capacity is idle) and limit consumption during peak load times on the grid.

QWhat conclusion did the 'Algorithm' company's research reach regarding the future of grid-powered mining farms in Russia?

AThe research concluded that within the next two to three years, the model of continuously operating mining farms from the grid would become economically unprofitable in Russia. Rising energy costs are already making Russia lose competitiveness to large American companies.

Пов'язані матеріали

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit9 хв тому

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit9 хв тому

PA Graphics Explanation | One Chart to Understand the Major Web3 Events in August 2026

**PANews Crypto Calendar: Key Web3 Events in August 2026** PANews introduces its revamped crypto calendar, featuring comprehensive coverage, flexible filtering, and easy export options. The market in August will be shaped by multiple key events across macroeconomics, regulation, tokenomics, and project developments: * **Macro & Policy:** Key US economic data releases (July Non-Farm Payrolls, CPI), the Federal Reserve meeting minutes, and the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium will be in focus. On the regulatory front, the US Senate plans to release a new draft of the *CLARITY Act*, while the EU's expanded crypto ban against Belarus comes into effect. * **Token Unlocks:** Significant token unlocks are scheduled for assets including ENA, AVAX, CONX, ZRO, and KAITO, which may influence market volatility. * **Project Updates & Shutdowns:** Several services, including Exchange Art, Ctrl Wallet, Zapper, NFTfi, and Summer.fi, are set to cease operations or undergo major adjustments. Users are advised to manage their assets accordingly. * **Corporate Activity:** Q2 earnings reports from companies like SpaceX, Circle, and Nvidia are due. Unitree Robotics will initiate its IPO subscription on the STAR Market, and Moonshot AI plans to begin a Pre-IPO financing round. * **Industry Events:** Major conferences such as Bitcoin Asia 2026 and the 2026 Digital Expo will take place. The overarching market narrative for August will revolve around macroeconomic expectations, regulatory developments, token unlock schedules, and ongoing industry consolidation.

marsbit19 хв тому

PA Graphics Explanation | One Chart to Understand the Major Web3 Events in August 2026

marsbit19 хв тому

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit44 хв тому

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit44 хв тому

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit50 хв тому

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit50 хв тому

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报59 хв тому

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报59 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片