The Biggest Buyer Disappears: The AI Capital Frenzy Is Reversing the 'De-Equitization' Cycle in US Stocks

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-15Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-15

Анотація

"The AI capital surge is reversing a two-decade-long trend of 'de-equitization' in the U.S. stock market. According to JPMorgan, net equity supply could reach $1.5 trillion over the next two years, the strongest cycle since the late 1990s. Goldman Sachs forecasts net supply will rise from negative to around zero by 2026, ending a key structural support for stocks. This shift is driven by massive capital demands from the AI race, pushing companies from buybacks to large-scale equity issuance. Landmark events include SpaceX's record $75B IPO, with OpenAI and Anthropic poised to follow. Alphabet is planning an $85B share sale, emblematic of tech giants turning from net buyers to sellers. While retail investors and money market funds are seen as potential buyers, concerns are rising. Analysts warn that such concentrated, large-scale issuance historically coincides with investment frenzies and often precedes weaker market returns and increased volatility. The era of easy 'stock market QE' is over, with supply becoming a significant market headwind."

SpaceX completes its record-breaking $750 billion IPO, OpenAI and Anthropic are poised for massive IPOs, and Alphabet is planning an $85 billion stock offering.

JPMorgan calculates that net equity supply will reach $1.5 trillion in the next two years; Goldman Sachs expects net supply to return to zero from negative territory by 2026. The 'de-equitization' era that supported the two-decade-long bull market in US stocks is officially over, with supply shock potentially becoming a major market headwind.

SpaceX's record-setting listing, OpenAI and Anthropic's imminent mega IPOs, Alphabet's planned $85 billion stock issuance – a wave of equity financing comparable to the internet bubble era is sweeping across the US capital markets. A core structural driver that underpinned the US stock market's long bull run over the past two decades is quietly unraveling.

On June 15th, according to Bloomberg, JPMorgan's calculations show that over the next two years, after accounting for buybacks, IPOs, secondary offerings, and other stock issuances will inject a net new supply of approximately $1.5 trillion into the US stock market, marking the strongest net equity issuance cycle since at least the late 1990s.

Simultaneously, Goldman Sachs research indicates that the net equity supply in the US stock market may return to near zero by 2026 – a metric that has remained negative since 2003 and has been one of the most important structural supports for US stocks over the past twenty years.

The core logic behind this shift is: The massive capital demands fueled by the AI arms race are forcing companies to pivot from "buying back shares and shrinking the float" to "issuing equity on a large scale and raising funds from the public."

The era of de-equitization, once called the "QE for stocks," is over, and a new era of "re-equitization" is beginning. This means the long-overlooked variable of supply will once again become a key factor influencing market direction.

Two Decades of 'De-Equitization': The End of a Persistent Tailwind

For nearly two decades, the US stock market had a distinct structural feature: persistent shrinkage in stock supply. S&P 500 component companies alone have retired nearly $12 trillion in market capitalization through buybacks. Companies collectively played the role of the market's biggest buyer, while many high-quality firms chose to stay private for a long time, further shrinking the pool of investable assets in the public market.

Robert Buckland, former Citigroup strategist and proponent of the "de-equitization" concept, likened this phenomenon to "quantitative easing for the stock market." He noted that companies' continuous reduction of outstanding shares was a sustained factor providing systematic support for stock prices over the past twenty years.

However, this logic is being completely overturned by the AI wave. According to Citigroup data, net buyback volume by hyperscalers has already declined last year. StoneX Financial global macro strategist Vincent Deluard describes this transition as a three-stage evolution:

"First it's out of profit and free cash flow, then they start borrowing, and now it's all of the above -- cash flow, debt, and equity."

Goldman Sachs research shows that the net equity supply in the US stock market may return to near zero by 2026, after over two decades of being negative. Bespoke Investment Group macro strategist George Pearkes characterizes this as "late-cycle behavior" and bluntly states that "in that light, it's a pretty negative signal."

Super IPO Wave: SpaceX Leads the Charge, OpenAI and Anthropic to Follow

Last week, SpaceX completed the largest IPO in history, raising $75 billion (Note: Corrected figure; context suggests it's likely a typo in the original Chinese, as 750亿美元 is $75 billion, not $750 billion) and surging 19% on its first trading day. This is just the beginning.

Reportedly, about 160 companies have announced plans to raise over $120 billion through IPOs this year, surpassing the combined total of the past two years. Including secondary offerings by listed companies, new stock supply in the first half of this year has exceeded $360 billion, the highest in five years for the same period.

Mega IPOs by OpenAI and Anthropic are expected to follow in the coming months. According to Ned Davis Research estimates, SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic could collectively raise over $170 billion in the near term.

Notably, the initial float offered by these three companies is extremely low – SpaceX sold less than 5% of its equity, below the typical 15% to 20% for IPOs. Once lock-up periods expire and more shares enter circulation, the market will face an even larger supply shock.

Ned Davis Research calculates that floating just a small portion of the equity from these three companies would be enough to offset a full year of S&P 500 buybacks.

Blackstone President Jon Gray said the listings of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI mark a point where the IPO market has "really found its footing," revealing that Blackstone has had three portfolio companies go public this year, with seven more in the pipeline.

Alphabet Leads Secondary Offerings: Tech Giants Shift from 'Biggest Buyer' to 'Biggest Seller'

Running parallel to the IPO wave are large-scale secondary offerings by already-listed tech giants.

Alphabet is the most representative case. The Google parent, once a long-term major buyer of its own stock through buybacks, after heavily borrowing in markets like the US and Japan to fund AI expansion, is now further planning a stock offering potentially as large as $85 billion (Note: Corrected figure as per typical scale; 850亿美元 in the original text is likely a typo for $85 billion), potentially one of the largest secondary offerings in history. Meta and others are also evaluating equity financing to support AI spending plans.

The logic driving this shift lies in changing relative financing costs. With the S&P 500 trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of around 25, a rare high for this century, the cost of equity financing has become cheaper relative to debt financing.

Since the Fed pushed rates to a two-decade high in 2023, the advantage of stock yields (the inverse of the P/E ratio) over bond yields has widened, a dynamic that persisted even after the Fed began cutting rates. Aptus Capital Advisors portfolio manager John Luke Tyner puts it bluntly:

"It just feels like there are a lot of people tapping the market for money, and they're doing so, most likely, not because they think their stock is cheap."

Who Will Buy? Retail Investors and Money Market Funds as Key Variables

Facing this immense supply, the market's core question is: Who will buy?

For now, optimism remains dominant. According to Bloomberg, retail trading volume now accounts for about one-fifth of total US stock trading volume, double the level of 2010. SpaceX allocated a high 20% of its IPO shares to individual investors, above typical levels.

Man Group Chief Market Strategist Kristina Hooper characterizes current market sentiment as "FOMO (fear of missing out) meets fear, and more often than not, FOMO is winning out."

The nearly $7.9 trillion stockpile in money market funds is also seen as a potential source of buying power. Investors note it remains unclear when this flood of equity and debt issuance might start to upset the market's digestion.

However, the concentration of demand raises flags for some market watchers. Bianco Research President Jim Bianco points out:

"There is unlimited investor appetite for AI and unlimited willingness to finance, but outside of that, everyone else is basically treading water."

JPMorgan Global Investment Banking Co-Head Kevin Foley also concedes that current capital markets activity is "pretty concentrated" and warns that "the world can change quickly, and there are still risks out there."

Historically, large-scale equity issuance often accompanies major investment booms, from railroads and canals to telecom networks. But history also shows that such waves often end in bubbles.

BCA Research Chief US Equity Strategist Noah Weisberger, after studying 40 years of market history and about 12,000 IPOs, found that in the 12 months following large IPOs, the S&P 500 tends to underperform other periods, with a median gain of just 8%, and negative returns occurring in about 20% of cases.

"What's coming is a batch of extremely large IPOs, and that only heightens the concern that these aren't small issues that the market can quickly digest, they could be material headwinds for the market."

ValueWorks hedge fund founder Charles Lemonides compares the current situation to the late 1920s and the 1990s, when waves of innovation fueled speculative stocks and massive financing, "On the way up, companies are fighting to take the money, investors are fighting to give it, because it's a gold rush and everybody wants in."

Robert Buckland states plainly that he has been waiting for equity supply to truly start ramping up as a signal to fight this bull market. "Now, it's actually ramping up."

AllianceBernstein Co-Head of Institutional Solutions Inigo Fraser Jenkins takes a more moderate stance, arguing that rising equity issuance should be understood more as a risk factor that dampens future returns and increases volatility, rather than a fundamental, game-changing watershed. "It narrows the path to success in some ways."

Пов'язані питання

QWhat core structural driver that supported the two-decade bull market in U.S. stocks is currently being dismantled according to the article?

AThe era of 'de-equitization' is ending. This refers to the long-term trend where companies acted as the largest net buyers of their own shares through massive buybacks, while many high-quality firms stayed private. This consistently reduced the supply of publicly traded shares, providing a structural tailwind for stock prices.

QWhat is the primary catalyst forcing companies to shift from buybacks to large-scale equity issuance, as described in the article?

AThe AI arms race is the primary catalyst. The enormous capital requirements for AI development and infrastructure are compelling companies—both new startups and established tech giants—to raise funds by issuing new equity (through IPOs and follow-on offerings) rather than shrinking their share count via buybacks.

QName two specific mega-IPOs mentioned in the article that are poised to follow SpaceX's record offering.

AThe article mentions that OpenAI and Anthropic are preparing for their own giant IPOs in the coming months, following SpaceX's $75 billion IPO.

QWhich major tech company is highlighted as shifting from being a major buyer to a potential major seller of its own stock, and what is the scale of its planned offering?

AAlphabet (Google's parent company) is highlighted. After years of being a large repurchaser of its own stock, it is now planning a follow-on stock offering of up to $85 billion, which could be one of the largest such offerings in history.

QWhat historical pattern does the article cite regarding the market performance following periods of large IPO volumes?

AResearch cited in the article shows that in the 12 months following large IPOs, the S&P 500 tends to underperform compared to other periods. The median gain is only 8%, and in about 20% of cases, returns are negative. This suggests such issuance waves often create headwinds for the broader market.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

In an unprecedented move mirroring the control of enriched uranium, the US Commerce Department has imposed an export control ban on Anthropic's advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing their global shutdown. This marks the first time a purely digital entity—a set of neural network weights—has been subjected to such hardware-like strategic export restrictions, based not on physical scarcity but on its concentrated "capability density." The article draws a direct parallel to the historical control of nuclear technology, arguing that just as uranium ore becomes a controlled substance only when enriched to a critical threshold, AI capabilities become subject to regulation when compressed into a single, potent, and easily accessible interface. This "enriched AI" is seen as crossing a threshold where its aggregated power poses a potential threat. The author predicts three major consequences over the next decade. First, capability auditing will become institutionalized, with governments setting compliance checklists and thresholds for model power, triggering automatic export controls. Second, jurisdictional boundaries will blur as US export controls extend their reach globally, governing any user of American AI services regardless of location, forcing non-US entities to reconsider their AI supply chain dependencies. Third, a technological bifurcation will occur, splitting the AI landscape into a restricted, high-risk track of advanced US proprietary models and a more reliable track of open-source or locally developed alternatives, where guaranteed access may outweigh raw performance. The core crisis exposed is the lack of a legal property rights framework for AI "intelligence." While companies invest heavily in integrating these models into their production systems, legally they only purchase a service that can be revoked at any time, leaving them with no recourse for their sunk investments. The conclusion warns of a permanently fractured digital world where the most capable models may not be the most usable, and clear, unassailable ownership of technology will become paramount.

marsbit2 хв тому

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

marsbit2 хв тому

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

On June 12, leading crypto data and capital markets platform Blockworks announced its acquisition of competitor Messari for over $10 million. This price represents a significant discount from Messari's 2022 valuation peak of approximately $300 million, highlighting the survival pressures faced by high-valuation startups during the bear market and a consolidation wave in data infrastructure. Blockworks, founded in 2018, began as a media and events company but has pivoted to focus on institutional-grade data, investor relations, and compliance tools. Its recent Series A extension round, valuing the company at $192 million, aimed to fund this shift and strategic acquisitions like this one. Messari, also founded in 2018, grew as a go-to platform for professional crypto research and data, raising a $35 million Series B at its $300 million valuation in late 2022. However, the prolonged bear market and subsequent internal changes, including founder Ryan Selkis's departure in 2024, increased operational pressures. The acquisition integrates Messari's extensive data platform and API capabilities with Blockworks's strengths in issuer-side disclosure, investor relations, and compliance workflows. The combined entity aims to build a unified "system of record" for the on-chain market. This reflects a broader industry trend where high-quality, structured data is becoming critical for institutional adoption, AI agents, and creating data moats akin to traditional financial platforms like Bloomberg. The deal exemplifies how market consolidation is reshaping the fragmented crypto data landscape.

marsbit30 хв тому

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

marsbit30 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit1 год тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片