Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-05Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-05

Анотація

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

Author: Jae, PANews

Flowing narratives, steadfast Near. From a high-performance public chain and sharding for scalability, to chain abstraction and Intents, and now to the hottest topic of AI Agent, Near has hardly missed any major narrative throughout several past crypto cycles.

Backed by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the classic Transformer AI paper and hailed as "the one who understands AI best in Web3," Near has delivered surprisingly impressive results even during the bear market. Today, Near is a cross-chain infrastructure giant that has processed over $20 billion in cumulative cross-chain transaction volume and generated over $34 million in fee revenue.

However, few know that Near's birth wasn't born from a grand blockchain ideal, but rather from a somewhat awkward practical dilemma: the inability to pay cross-border salaries. Eight years ago, to solve the problem of paying its global developers, the AI startup co-founded by Illia Polosukhin was forced to pause its AI dream and pivot to building a public chain.

Now, as the AI wave sweeps the globe, this public chain, born from AI and once sidetracked for AI, has returned to where the story began.

Payroll Problem Unexpectedly Gives Birth to a Public Chain, Now Returning to the AI Track

History sometimes comes full circle in a remarkable way. Nine years ago, Illia Polosukhin was not yet one of the crypto founders most associated with AI.

Near was founded in 2017 by Illia Polosukhin, co-author of the Transformer paper and former Google machine learning researcher, and Alexander Skidanov, a distributed systems expert.

Near was initially an artificial intelligence startup focused on the field of "Program Synthesis," essentially "teaching machines to write code" to automate software development. Its concept was similar to later projects like OpenAI's CodeX, Anthropic's Claude Code, and Cursor.

To train algorithms and models, the team recruited computer science students worldwide to remotely write code snippets. However, how to pay developers distributed across the globe became a major hurdle.

Cross-border payment systems at the time were far less mature than today. Mainstream tools like PayPal and Wise faced severe limitations in Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, plagued by delayed settlements and exchange rate losses. Interestingly, when the two founders tried using early public chains for cross-border payments, they found that high Gas fees and low settlement efficiency made it impossible to distribute payments cost-effectively in batches.

For a resource-limited AI startup, this was almost an unsolvable problem. Ultimately, the two founders, with backgrounds in large-scale distributed systems, made a surprising decision: to shelve AI model development and instead build a highly scalable, low-fee, and user-friendly public chain themselves.

This passive pivot, triggered by the inability to "pay salaries," led to the birth of the "Near Protocol" in 2018.

However, the early transition path was not smooth. After leaving the AI track, Near shifted to developing a high-performance public chain focused on sharding technology to solve blockchain's scalability challenges.

With solid technical prowess, the Near Protocol secured over $500 million in cumulative funding during this period. Yet, in the fierce competition of the public chain arena, Near neither formed a landmark application nor managed to attract large-scale developer adoption. Sparse ecosystem applications, stagnant user growth, and low market attention meant that even with an advanced sharding architecture, Near's attention was often diverted by other hot public chains in the crowded "Ethereum killer" environment. The protocol once fell into a quiet period of "critical acclaim but poor sales."

During the 2020-2021 bull market, Near caught the cross-chain trend, with the launch of the Rainbow Bridge becoming a key catalyst for its ecosystem explosion and token price surge.

The outbreak of the AI boom brought a turning point for Near's destiny. In March 2024, at the GTC global developer conference, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang invited Illia Polosukhin and six other co-authors of the Transformer paper for a stage discussion.

Jensen Huang praised the paper as having "changed the world," emphasizing that the Transformer architecture is the foundation of all AI industry achievements, reshaping the global technology, content, and financial landscape. This spotlight moment allowed Illia Polosukhin, as a co-creator, and Near, with its interrupted AI dream, to once again attract the crypto market's attention with the legitimate status of "AI lineage."

Returning to the battlefield with a new posture, Near's unique "technical core" was further activated. Seizing this opportunity, the protocol pivoted towards Near Intents and confidential transactions, laying a solid foundation amid the trend of multi-chain intent and Agent Economy convergence.

The intent transaction layer significantly lowered the interaction barrier for AI Agents, enabling Agents like Venice AI deployed in confidential hardware TEEs (Trusted Execution Environments) to autonomously, securely, and cost-effectively transfer funds across multiple chains.

Near Intents Becomes New Growth Line, Amassing $20 Billion in Trading Volume

Near Intents redefines the cross-chain trading experience. In the traditional multi-chain environment, users need to manually operate cross-chain bridges, prepare different Gas tokens on source and destination chains, and constantly watch out for slippage and friction costs for a single cross-chain asset swap.

Near uses an intent mechanism to abstract the entire process. Users only need to express their trading needs, such as "swap BTC on the source chain for ETH on the destination chain," without understanding the cross-chain path and Gas costs. This is the interaction experience ordinary users, and even future AI Agents, seek.

The execution of cross-chain transactions relies on an off-chain Solver network's bidding mechanism.

  • When a user submits an intent request, the Solver network bids via the Solver Bus, automatically finding and calculating the optimal execution route and quote.

  • Once the user signs the quote, the intent is submitted to the Verifier smart contract on the Near chain for final settlement.

Throughout this process, Gas fees are deducted seamlessly in the background, allowing users to pay without noticing, effectively unleashing the vitality of DeFi cross-chain trading. The significant optimization of user experience led to widespread integration of Near by traffic gateways like Ledger.

However, the potential centralization of the Solver network is a significant risk. As solvers require ample liquidity for market-making and complex algorithm optimization, trading APIs like 1Click typically rely on trusted swap aggregators and leading market makers. This could lead to oligopoly in the solver market, weakening the price advantages originally brought by the bidding mechanism.

Data from DeFi Llama shows Near Intents is deployed across 25 public chains, covering the major settlement networks of the crypto market.

The protocol's TVL (Total Value Locked) exceeds $85 million. It not only retains $36.5 million in funds on the Near chain but also establishes deep liquidity on chains like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Tron through chain abstraction mechanisms. This breadth of the cross-chain ecosystem is key to Near Intents surpassing the $20 billion mark in cumulative trading volume.

From a profitability perspective, since the launch of Near Intents, the protocol has generated over $33 million in fees. More than 70% of this revenue came from the last two quarters. This indicates that as the multi-chain ecosystem continues to expand, the protocol's profitability is also showing a growth trend.

The gradually increasing fee revenue will establish a positive feedback mechanism for NEAR at the economic level. The vast majority of network fees are burned, injecting deflationary pressure into the NEAR token and further enhancing its value capture capability.

Confidential Transactions Swallow 40% of Volume: Growth Engine or Regulatory Hazard?

Currently, as on-chain activity grows, privacy needs are no longer a niche demand in the crypto market, and this has become Near's differentiating advantage.

Since launching "Confidential Intents" and "Confidential Swaps" features in the first quarter of this year, their adoption rate has risen rapidly. Over the past 30 days, the total trading volume on the Near chain was $209 million, with confidential swap volume reaching $87 million, accounting for 41.63%. This data reflects not just product adoption but the genuine existence of market demand.

Behind this business explosion is Near addressing a long-standing structural pain point in the DeFi market: the highly transparent on-chain ledger exposes the positions and intentions of large traders. This leads to severe sandwich attacks (MEV), significant slippage, and strategy leakage when institutions or whales execute large trades.

The Confidential Intents feature, by introducing programmable privacy technology, allows users to seamlessly switch to "confidential mode" on the frontend interface. In this mode: the transaction amount, direction, and position are completely hidden from the outside world during execution, with only verifiable encrypted accounting performed on-chain at settlement.

Bots' sandwich attacks fail, and traders' business secrets are protected. The Confidential Swaps feature will open a relatively safe DeFi channel for institutional capital, reducing trading friction and facilitating the integration of on-chain ecosystems with mainstream finance.

However, the other side of the coin cannot be ignored. A privacy transaction share exceeding 40% proves the existence of real demand but may also attract regulatory scrutiny. Global regulatory pressure on privacy protocols like Tornado Cash has never eased. Anonymous large-scale fund flows are more likely to trigger regulatory enforcement. If regulators deem the "Confidential Swaps" model to pose money laundering risks, Near may inevitably fall under regulatory scrutiny, potentially becoming its biggest future uncertainty.

Looking back on its nine-year journey, Near's growth script shows a highly dramatic trajectory. Despite experiencing public chain competition, market cycles, and narrative shifts, it has continuously adjusted its development direction.

Today, chain abstraction, Intents, and confidential transactions have become Near's new exploration focus. The AI boom has prompted the market to re-examine this public chain's unique background. However, whether these attempts can help Near build a more solid ecosystem moat still requires more time to observe.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the original motivation behind the creation of the NEAR blockchain, and what problem was it trying to solve?

AThe NEAR blockchain was created to solve a practical problem: an AI startup founded by Illia Polosukhin and Alexander Skidanov couldn't efficiently pay its globally distributed team of developers due to high costs and inefficiencies in existing cross-border payment systems and early blockchains.

QHow has the NEAR protocol's 'Intents' mechanism improved the user experience for cross-chain transactions?

ANEAR's 'Intents' mechanism abstracts the complexity of cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their desired outcome (e.g., 'swap BTC for ETH'), and a network of solvers automatically finds and executes the optimal route, handling gas fees in the background, making the process seamless and user-friendly.

QWhat is a key risk associated with the solver network that powers the NEAR Intents system?

AA key risk is potential centralization and oligopoly within the solver network. As solvers require significant liquidity and complex algorithms, major market makers and trusted exchange APIs could dominate, potentially undermining the price competition the bidding mechanism is designed to foster.

QWhat does the significant adoption of NEAR's 'Confidential Swaps' feature indicate about the current DeFi market?

AThe high adoption rate of 'Confidential Swaps' (over 40% of recent NEAR transaction volume) indicates a strong and growing market demand for on-chain privacy, particularly among institutional and large traders seeking to protect their strategies from MEV attacks, front-running, and slippage.

QWhat is the potential regulatory challenge highlighted for NEAR's private transaction features?

AThe regulatory challenge is that the high volume of private transactions could attract scrutiny from global financial watchdogs. Regulators may view features like 'Confidential Swaps' as potential tools for money laundering, similar to their stance on other privacy protocols, which could pose a significant future risk for NEAR.

Пов'язані матеріали

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit12 хв тому

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit12 хв тому

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit17 хв тому

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit17 хв тому

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit27 хв тому

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit27 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片